| Current revision |
Your text |
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | :I say it's [[TTATOT]]. Many products and medications are supposed to be applied directly to something.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 06:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | | :I say it's [[TTATOT]]. Many products and medications are supposed to be applied directly to something.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 06:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
| | ::I dunno, it seems pretty similar to me. The intonation of how Homestar says "apply directly to the esophagus!" reminds me greatly of Head-On's repeated "apply directly to the forehead!" slogan. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 09:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | | ::I dunno, it seems pretty similar to me. The intonation of how Homestar says "apply directly to the esophagus!" reminds me greatly of Head-On's repeated "apply directly to the forehead!" slogan. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 09:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
| - | :::Lots of things use the phrasing "apply directly to ___". Besides, if it were really referencing HeadOn, wouldn't the line have been repeated at least a couple of times? [[User:Foxx|Foxx]] 21:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Good Stuff == | | == Good Stuff == |
| Line 27: |
Line 26: |
| | | | |
| | It seems to me that after Homestar's voice clears up, it's changed from his old voice to his modern one, suggesting that the content of the Melonade Throat Closers packet is responsible for that change. Or am I just crazy? | | It seems to me that after Homestar's voice clears up, it's changed from his old voice to his modern one, suggesting that the content of the Melonade Throat Closers packet is responsible for that change. Or am I just crazy? |
| - | :It returned back to normal shortly after. Considering the difference in Homestar's voice between 2001 and 2009, maybe Matt did 2009 Homestar's voice for just those few lines instead of 2001 Homestar's? {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 23:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Tandy email count == | | == Tandy email count == |
| Line 66: |
Line 64: |
| | ::Absolutely not.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 18:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | | ::Absolutely not.--{{User:Record307/sig}} 18:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
| | :::K, didn't think so. | | :::K, didn't think so. |
| - | ::::No, no way. And please sign your posts. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 20:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Thats Good Stuff == | | == Thats Good Stuff == |
| Line 72: |
Line 69: |
| | Wasn't this phrase used for the email Enviornment? When Strong Bad watered Marzipans plants with Cigarette Butts, the coughed then said "Oh... thats good stuff!" Do you think this is an inside refrence? | | Wasn't this phrase used for the email Enviornment? When Strong Bad watered Marzipans plants with Cigarette Butts, the coughed then said "Oh... thats good stuff!" Do you think this is an inside refrence? |
| | :It's more of a drug-use joke. I've seen this happen in some other cartoons as well before the Marzipan's plants thing. There are too few occurrences of this on H*R to classify it as a running gag, and, therefore, mention it as an Inside Reference. {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 16:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | | :It's more of a drug-use joke. I've seen this happen in some other cartoons as well before the Marzipan's plants thing. There are too few occurrences of this on H*R to classify it as a running gag, and, therefore, mention it as an Inside Reference. {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 16:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
| - | ::An inside reference is stated, somewhere, to be any reference to a previous toon, game, or any other material that [[The Brothers Chaps]] made, running gag or not. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 20:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | == It can't be THAT unintelligible == | | == It can't be THAT unintelligible == |
| Line 78: |
Line 74: |
| | It sounds to me like "I have a face, and it gets in your gut"... which doesn't make an OUNCE of sense, but that's all I can get from it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | | It sounds to me like "I have a face, and it gets in your gut"... which doesn't make an OUNCE of sense, but that's all I can get from it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
| | :It sounds like "Oh, I have a face, and <something> gun..." to me. "...it gets in your..." would fit where that <something> is. Again, that is also equally nonsensical, but this IS Strong Bad that's saying it. No one in that universe makes sense all the time. But "gun" would be out of left field even for them. {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 16:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | | :It sounds like "Oh, I have a face, and <something> gun..." to me. "...it gets in your..." would fit where that <something> is. Again, that is also equally nonsensical, but this IS Strong Bad that's saying it. No one in that universe makes sense all the time. But "gun" would be out of left field even for them. {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 16:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
| - | :: I think he said "and it gets the job done" which makes some more sense. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 19:59, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::I thought he said "And it gets in your gun." {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::I hear "Oh, I have a face, and it is all done, I'm Strong Bad, he's The Cheat and I'm Strong Bad." Not sure how much sense it makes, perhaps he's making a joke about the art style and [[Strong Bad Evolution|how many times it's been changed since then]], but whatever the case, that's what i hear. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::I hear five distinct syllables between "and" and "I'm", though. "it is all done" is only four syllables. One thing we all seem to agree on, though, is that it's "face", not "place" as was originally written in the article (seems someone changed it since last I looked.) --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::PS. This should totally be this week's QotW. It's appropriate ''and'' it would solve this [[Fan Costumes '08|conumdrum]].
| + | |
| - | :::Huh.. I'm going to vote for [[User:Jellote|Jellote]]'s interpretation. That is...if we're taking a vote. {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 03:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | I thought it sounds like "and I'll kick you in the gut" [[User:Goodjorb|Goodjorb]]
| + | |
| - | ::::I'm fairly sure it's "I have a face, and ''1-2-3-4-5''." 5 syllables. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 18:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | We can't just sit here like babies! It is time for action! LEGAL action! We must either clear this up with a vote now or lest we sucumb to *jibbly jibbly* using footnotes! The horror!--[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 11:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| | == Okay, this is really bugging me. == | | == Okay, this is really bugging me. == |
| | | | |
| Line 92: |
Line 80: |
| | :If you added it to remarks, what are you trying to get out of mentioning it here too? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | | :If you added it to remarks, what are you trying to get out of mentioning it here too? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
| | ::I don't think it's really a huge plot hole. Taking the idea and pretending it was his own, to the point that years later he has entirely forgotten that he got the idea from Homestar, or even ever saw Homestar answering emails, fits his arrogance and self-centered character to a tee. [[Special:Contributions/98.222.134.36|98.222.134.36]] 14:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | | ::I don't think it's really a huge plot hole. Taking the idea and pretending it was his own, to the point that years later he has entirely forgotten that he got the idea from Homestar, or even ever saw Homestar answering emails, fits his arrogance and self-centered character to a tee. [[Special:Contributions/98.222.134.36|98.222.134.36]] 14:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
| - | ::: Wait, did everyone else not notice Strong bad saying "Let's go start answering fan mail in humorous fashion. Nobody's ever done that before!"? It seems despite walking in on homestar doing it, we was still oblivios to hremails all the way to email thunder.
| |
| | | | |
| | == Strong Bad's technical domain == | | == Strong Bad's technical domain == |
| Line 118: |
Line 105: |
| | Word on [http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=15304&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=30 the forum] is that this is all a big retcon, and considering all the inconsistencies we've picked out... I'm settling for the theory that TBC made this as a <s>reference to the new Star Trek movie</s> joke. lolz {{User:Neox/sig}} 00:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | | Word on [http://forum.hrwiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=15304&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=30 the forum] is that this is all a big retcon, and considering all the inconsistencies we've picked out... I'm settling for the theory that TBC made this as a <s>reference to the new Star Trek movie</s> joke. lolz {{User:Neox/sig}} 00:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| | + | == Inconsistency attack == |
| | | | |
| | + | since there has been a large pile of inconsistencies coming from this toon, i think they should have their own section under Fun Facts. also, one more for the pile before i add it in: if homestar had his own email show before sbemails began, and had knowledge of internet and technology, and PREVIOUSLY OWNED THE TANDY, then what's up with his reaction in [[50 emails]]? --{{User:Neumannz/sig}} 12:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| | == Inconsistency attack == | | == Inconsistency attack == |
| | | | |
| | since there has been a large pile of inconsistencies coming from this toon, i think they should have their own section under Fun Facts. also, one more for the pile before i add it in: if homestar had his own email show before sbemails began, and had knowledge of internet and technology, and PREVIOUSLY OWNED THE TANDY, then what's up with his reaction in [[50 emails]]? --[[User:Neumannz|Neumannz]] 12:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | | since there has been a large pile of inconsistencies coming from this toon, i think they should have their own section under Fun Facts. also, one more for the pile before i add it in: if homestar had his own email show before sbemails began, and had knowledge of internet and technology, and PREVIOUSLY OWNED THE TANDY, then what's up with his reaction in [[50 emails]]? --[[User:Neumannz|Neumannz]] 12:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) |
| - |
| |
| - | *Look at the design gap between 7 and 49, sure, maybe Homestar is a little slow on answering new e-mails, but it is quite possible that he forgot about his show for a while, and being Homestar, forgot about e-mails. Now, don't you bring up [[credit card]], I don't have an answer to that. --[[User:The Swedish Ace|The Swedish Ace]] 18:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | :: I agree with there being a separate section for Inconsistencies/Canon Breaks in this email, since there are so many. --[[User:TimMierz|TimMierz]] 18:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::No, just putting them on [[Inconsistencies within the Homestar Runner Universe]] should be enough. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 20:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Contract expiry ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Is there any Inside-Ref significance to March 2003? I had a quick look through the [[H*R.com updates 2003|toons of that time]]... and he's got a cup of coffee at the end of [[caper]], which came out at the end of March 2003. Is anyone bored enough to look through all of Homestar's appearances from ca. 2001 to caper and see if that's the first time he's seen drinking or talking about (or bathing in, I guess) a non-Melonade drink? {{User:Phlip/sig}} 14:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Well, the article used to say that Homestar mentioned Witch's Brew in [[the show]]. I don't know why it's been removed. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 15:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::See [[#A drinking stretch]]. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Johny Vest in the Chest? ==
| |
| - | Could this refer to how Strong Bad often makes fun of peoples names? Should we note it? --[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 21:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | == the tandy==
| |
| - | I was watching some of the computers being destroyed. after the tandy exploded, strong sad says that strong bad got it at a garage sale for 15 bucks. even if garage sale means garBage sale, he never paid any money for it. I put this up and it got taken down. I dun know [[User:Goodjorb|Goodjorb]]
| |
| - | :Watch again, he says that you COULD get one LIKE IT at a garage sale, not that he DID get THAT ONE there. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Number ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | I'm noticing that this hremail is being placed in between hremails 2000 and 3184. whenever such an inconsistency in release dates has happened [[sb_email 22|before]], it has been in line with the number instead of the release date. should we keep consistent to that incidence here or not? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 04:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Now i see that they've all been reverted. I specifically opened this talk section so that they wouldn't be reverted before coming to a consensus here. That's what talk pages are for. Why did they all get reverted first? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Ghost cable ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | I noticed that when Strong Bad takes the computer out of the trash can, the cable isn't lifted out of the can, it just goes through it instead. Should this be in the remarks section?
| |
| - | [[Special:Contributions/24.12.29.215|24.12.29.215]] 17:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | :I'd say so. Looks more like a goof than a remark, though. {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 17:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == The Cheat's 2001 voice used? ==
| |
| - | I've noticed that in this Hremail, The Cheat's voice can be compared to [[A Jumping Jack Contest]] and [[A Jorb Well Done]]. It's a little softer than modern toons. Would this be noted under "Remarks" along with Homestar Runner's voice? {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 22:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | ::I think this is due to the fact like they've gone back in time, this was made in 2009 but is meant to look like 1999 because everyone sounds like they're from a Jump Jack Contest, made in the same year. So no, it's on purpose, they could of matched, or they're used the same recorded, whatever way they did it, it's on purpose. --[[File:qod 4 - bubs.PNG|18px]] [[User:Bubz|Bubz]] [[File:qod 4 - bubs.PNG|18px]] 22:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == remarks rewording ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | The remarks section has too many sub-bullet sections that need to be reworded to sound less argumentative and/or merged into their respective parent-bullets. I just [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Hremail_7&diff=715208&oldid=714849 fixed one of them] but the others are less clear cut, and might merit further discussion. Even though they're about the continuity errors, which are already discussed to death on this talk page. I don't want to change it to something that 50% of the wiki users will disagree with and watch it get changed back and forth 12 times.--{{User:Johnny Jupiter/sig}} 07:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Just sign this contract... ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | As ridiculously in-depth the Remarks section is for this Hremail, I haven't seen anybody calculate just how long that contract of Homestar's actually lasted. I mean, we've seen him shower in regular water (Main Page 14), and bathe in money (Easter egg in Ever and More!), so... --[[User:Camwoodstock|I was raised by a cup of coffee - Camwoodstock]] 20:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - | :The Ever and More! Easter egg doesn't count; the contract mostly likely specifies that he cannot bathe in any other '''liquid''' - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 23:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Remarks section ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | I believe the Remarks section is too long. [[User:StarFox|StarFox]] 00:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
| - | :What exactly do you mean by "too long"? We don't typically have rules about the maximum length of a section. A section should be no longer or shorter than the number of items worthy of appearing in it. Sometimes that means one item, sometimes it means 30. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::Understood. [[User:StarFox|StarFox]] 19:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
