Talk:Eyeball pear
From Homestar Runner Wiki
This is an item we have seen twice. It's already covered to completion on Googly-eyed Objects and as such does not merit its own page. - Qermaq - (T/C) 01:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- As much as I like this item and wish it deserved its own page, I have to agree with Qermaq. Heimstern Läufer
01:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yea it should go. The information for this is all related to one gag, and doesn't need any more explanation than what is available in the articles related to it's apearences. It's something that anyone would notice (so not something that only a few would notice at first) and it's meaning cannot be expounded by anything we would say here at the wiki for anyone who would be interested in the item. (plus it is already in all the related places (Googly-eyed)). . .ok enough expounding on that for now . . . Ilko Skevüld's Teh C 02:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- In case it takes four people to decide, I think it should be deleted. SaltyTalk! 02:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Don't we usually allow a page for items that stand out, even if they only appeared once? having said that. I don't think that an article for the "eyeball pear" makes sense. It doesn't add any value to the wiki. Loafing
02:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Don't we usually allow a page for items that stand out, even if they only appeared once? having said that. I don't think that an article for the "eyeball pear" makes sense. It doesn't add any value to the wiki. Loafing
- In case it takes four people to decide, I think it should be deleted. SaltyTalk! 02:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yea it should go. The information for this is all related to one gag, and doesn't need any more explanation than what is available in the articles related to it's apearences. It's something that anyone would notice (so not something that only a few would notice at first) and it's meaning cannot be expounded by anything we would say here at the wiki for anyone who would be interested in the item. (plus it is already in all the related places (Googly-eyed)). . .ok enough expounding on that for now . . . Ilko Skevüld's Teh C 02:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)