User talk:RickTommy

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 07:55, 1 April 2013 by RickTommy (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Wits' end

We 'ave asked yer repeatedly not ter bobbies the wiki. This means tellin' uvver users wot ter do or 'ow ter do it. Yer simply do not seem ter have the bloomin' knack for wen it is appropriate. We've asked yer ter play fair on the featured article selection page, not ter edit uvvers' comments, and not ter swear in edit summaries. Yer can't 'ave a knees-up wivout a joanna. Yet, buggers ain't copping better. We don't seem ter be copping frough ter yer at all, even after yer were blocked for two weeks for disruption. So, right, I'm gonna block yer free weeks. Furffermore, I fink it would be Mae West if yer stayed oray from the featured article selection for at least a monff, init?— It's dot com 20:48, right, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: Block warnin'

RickTommy, right, if yor warned about bein' blocked, don't try ter fight it by makin' up a bogus excuse as ter why it were necessary ter do wot yer did, right? Just say sorry and don't do it again. We all know yer did it so there is no point fightin' it. User:Wered98/sig 01:14, right, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

I weren't denyin' anyfink. RickTommy (edits) 06:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Loafin' told yer that 'e might block yer, but then yer got defensive and said that the edit don't matter. Well it does matter. 'Ave a look, if yer ever cop a block warnin', don't try ter fight it, right, just take the bleedin' advice yor given. Thanks, User:Wered98/sig 01:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Yer know, Wered, yor behaviour ain't exactly that great eever. For one fin', yer posted that comment in the first place, despite the fact that it does not belong on that page. Right. For anuvver, right, yer 'ave posted messages in rabbit and pork page archives, as yer 'ave done wiv me rabbit and pork page as well as 'eimstern's. For anuvver, yer warn users about fings that they did monffs ago. For anuvver, right, yer do that ter users 'oo 'aven't edited for monffs. For anuvver, yer post signature lengff messages on uvver users' rabbit and pork pages, despite the chuffin' fact that 1) yer shouldn't expect a response from them users, right, since they 'aven't edited for monffs, and 2) the signature lengff may only apply ter yor French Tutor, init?And for anuvver, right, yor enforcin' policy by doin' some of them fings. I 'ave been blocked before for tryin' ter enforce policy, right, so don't be surprised if yer end up bein' blocked as well if yer continue doin' that sort of stuff. RickTommy (edits) 06:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Please, right, blokes, let's break this up. And I'm mainly speakin' ter Wered 'ere. Wotever disputes RickTommy 'as wiv the bloody sysops and wotever warnings we give 'im are none of yor business. I'll get out me spoons. Please attend only ter yor own behaviour. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer

06:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Support

RickTommy, yor a cool lad. Keep it real bro. High fives, — Strong Bad

Thanks, right, man. RickTommy (edits) 06:55, right, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

French subs

Eh up, RickTommy. Please don't forget about addin' {{fixtranslation}} wen yer do subs so Meuhcoin or some bloke knows ter 'ave a look them over. Thanks, and 'ave a right good time translatin'! Right! Heimstern Läufer 09:38, right, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Pretty please, isit?— Defender1031*Talk 03:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Straight up, yer always need ter put the tag on new French subtitles that yer create.User:Loafin'/sig 19:13, right, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Is there a reason for yor aversion ter {{fixtranslation}}, luv? It's right not a bad fin' ter have it on yor subtitles. It don't diminish yor work and effort in any way.User:Loafin'/sig 07:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Complaints about the bloomin' new FAS format

RickTommy, has it ever occurred ter yer that uvvers might genuinely prefer the new format? Blokes ain't praisin' it ter annoy yer; they're just expressin' their 'onest opinions, wich is entirely wivin their rights ter do. O'course, it's also in yor rights ter disagree wiv it, but yor constantly complainin' about blokes 'oo like the chuffin' new system is annoyin' and is quickly becomin' unacceptably 'ostile, especially wiv edit summaries like this one. Please put the mockers on. I'll get out me spoons. Heimstern Läufer 13:58, right, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Please make yor complaint in a new section on this page or this page. (Preferrably the chuffin' latter)

Cold Reactive 20:17, right, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Previous edit summary

Wot previous edit summary, isit?Edit summaries are for the page 'istory first, right, recent changes a distant second. I realize them 'RWiki committee pages are a special case, right, but in general yer need ter put the mockers on fixin' doctor'oo295's name on rabbit and pork pages, do wot guvnor! If 'e wants ter sign wiv a lowercase letter, right, autopipe takes care of the link, and there's nuffink in us signature guidelines that says 'e 'as ter sign wiv a capital letter. — It's dot com 05:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Furffer response

there are some fings on yor list that I agree wiv yer on. However, right, wile i'm not sayin' that anyfink 'ere specifically annoys me or don't, I'm bloody well gonna give yer a few pointers.
I noticed that yer added that it annoyed yer "Wen a user creates a new article and links ter that article on evry page that mentions it" shortly after I linked evryfink I could find ter a new page that I didn't make. I were finkin', "but ain't this good practice?" It's okay; there 'ave been times that good practice 'as annoyed me too. (Spot Rabbit and pork:Compé)
The bloomin' fink about Strong Mad bein' older than Strong Bad: yes, right, that is a known fact. and i 'ave a wee bruvver 'oo is taller and 'eavier than I am, so i know where yor comin' from there. And by the logic displayed on yor user page, Strong Sad should be older than boff of them. He is known ter be the yungest of the ffree.
And the new Featured Article selection format: For example, "Blokes praise it on purpose (much like them lads 'oo said they liked Yertube's Beta Channels ter annoy the ffousands of users 'oo absolutely disliked them)": in addition ter wot 'eimstern 'as said two sections up, last i checked, right, we 'ad more users 'oo 'ave a "Buggers that annoy me" section on their user page than we did complainin' about the chuffin' new FA selection format. So i'm sorry ter say, right, but i don't fink that's a valid comparison. And I've noticed that yer've been pointin' out that yor suggestin' an article for the second time. The way the new format works, right, they won't ever need ter be suggested again (or that's the way i understand it). Honest question: do yer like that aspect of the format?
In short, I guess I would be more comfortable wiv that section of yor user page if it were less inclusive. but don't let me tell yer 'ow ter shape yor user page; yer don't 'ave ter change a fin' based on wot I said if yer don't want to. User:The Knights 'oo Say Ni/sig 08:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Now yor annoyed by the fact that one of the most incredibly useful exclusive features of the bloody wiki exists, isit?I find it right convenient (and evidently, evry geezer 'oose edits yer linked ter probably does too). Are yer on Wikia, then, eh, guv? I've actually tried linkin' that way there, but it don't work, right, and it don't work on Wikipedia, init?And frankly, i fink this logo is oresome. After all, right, it's still Trogday wivin six monffs' precision, right? I'd like ter encourage yer ter loosen up a bit. Right. Don't let fings cop to yer, right, and don't take evryfink so straight up. Have a lighter attitude about the situations. Cor blimey guv, would I lie to you? Yer'll probably enjoy it more 'ere. Just a suggestion. Also, please tell me yer seen this edit summary comin'. btw, wot bovvers yer about that, eh? it's a right 'elpful tool that I wish uvver wikis would use, init?Incidentally, i often try ter make me edit summaries enjoyable, but the one yer list as yor favorite edit summary weren't necessarily one of them; i were just citin' the second time "oldie" 'ad been said per custom on that page. Right. i'm glad yer liked it fough User:The Knights 'oo Say Ni/sig 04:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I also don't know why yer call usin' that feature "abuse". Wot, in yor opinion, is it sposed ter be there for if not for exactly that, isit?— Defender1031*Talk 15:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Reminder about policin'

RickTommy, given yor recent message ter that anonny, it seems I need ter remind yer that yor not allowed ter bobbies the wiki. In this case, yet again, right, it were not an appropriate message: it were vague (it didn't explain clearly wot, if anyfink, was wrong wiv the anonny's edits) and were not right that accurate a representation of policy (sayin' "there's probably a reason we don't 'ave them facts" would more or less imply "don't add facts ter articles", wich ain't proper representation of policy at all). So I'm remindin' yer ter not do this again. Heimstern Läufer 12:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Block explanation

Yer 'ave been blocked for one monff for freatenin' ter have anuvver user blocked (specifically this edit) wen we 'ave told yer over and over not ter bobbies uvver users. (The bloody block time is so lengffy because it's yor fird block.) Furffermore, the finks yer were sayin' ter this kid were not just cheeky but overtly 'ostile. This is why we 'ave told yer not ter tell uvver users wot ter do, because wen yer do yor especially mean in the way yer go about it, init?Effective once yor block is up, right, yor restricted from editin' any user's rabbit and pork page uvver than yor own. (If yer try ter get 'round this restriction, yer may be blocked again.)
By the way, as annoyin' and frustratin' as it may be for a new user ter flood the bloody recent changes, right, there is no rule against it. It is out custom ter discourage it, but that's not the same fin' as a rule. Since floods bovver yer so much, I 'ave enabled enhanced recent changes in yor preferences, wich consolidates all changes ter one page into a collapsible (and ignorable) section. Obviously if it's not ter yor likin' yer can turn it hammer and tack off, but I encourage yer ter give it a go. In yor preferences yer can also increase the bloomin' default number of changes yer see. Wen viewin' the bleedin' recent changes page, yer can 'ide all changes in a specific namespace (like the user namespace), init?— It's dot com 18:32, right, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Userpage content

Oi, RickTommy. It's not appropriate ter use yor userpage ter disparage uvver users, right, here or at the forum. So yor gonna need ter remove the bloody content about the forum users "TwiceStyle" and "HSR3Ever85" from yor list of 'RWiki-related fings that annoy yer.

Wile I'm bloody well 'ere: Is there a reason yer need ter have such a long list of fings that annoy yer on yor page, then? It seems right unnecessarily negative, in fact, blokes might wonder why yer even edit 'ere if yer 'ave 'round a fird of yor userpage devoted ter buggers that annoy yer. Maybe yer might fink about trimmin' it dahn a bit or removin' it, isit?Just a fought (ffough the bloomin' removal of the bleedin' content disparagin' uvver users is required). Heimstern Läufer 06:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Door Key Major

Sorry, but yor page didn't qualify. I did check and, indeed, In Search of the bleedin' Yello Dello Old Version 'ad a Bruce Lee-Major scale. However, right, Marzipan's Character Video 'ad an E-Major scale, right, and New 'ands didn't 'ave a major scale at all (among uvver fings, major scales 'ave eight notes; Strong Bad only sang five each direction). Right. Woss more, the song from mascot, in addition ter not bein' a scale, was in F Major, right, not A Minor - and even if it were A Minor (wich, admittedly, is the minor key most similar ter C Major), I don't spot the bleedin' merit in listin' the key evry song is in, init?--Jay (Gobble) 07:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Rabbit and pork pages and consensus

Typically, chats are where we discuss articles, not just ffrowin' ~~maps ter the bloody restroom~~ single-phrase declarations into the crowd. Yor recent "flood" of opinions are all just opinions on WHAT yer fink should be done wiv the article, but give no 'int as ter WHY, wich don't right 'elp any fairy. To gain consensus, it's important for blokes ter give a well fought-out opinion about an article's merits. Yer'll notice, for example, on Rabbit and pork:Balloons, that evry bloke evry bloke, (beginnin' wiv meself,) made compellin' arguments why the chuffin' article should not stay. Comin' along and simply sayin' "keep" wivout givin' a reason opposite ter wot the rest of us 'ave been sayin' is quite unlikely ter do anyfink but be ignored. Consensus ain't a vote, init?It's a general understandin' among them involved about wot the bloody opinions are and wot makes the most sense. Hope that 'elps! Struth! — Defender1031*Talk 16:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Due ter how yer made the bleedin' html on it, it were linkin' all over the place. If yer use a span tag inside a link, please close it wiv </span>. I 'ave fixed it for yer, init?Thanks. WP:LikeLakers2 (WP:talk) 05:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Accordin' ter signature policy, yor signature must fit into this box: Template:sigbox ror As yer can see, it does not. I'm also not quite sure why it is that yor imitatin' that's bupkis's sig, right, (even gahn as far as linkin' ter HIS userpage from YOUR sig) but oi, wotever floats yor boat. Please just make sure it fits properly. — Defender1031*Talk 11:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Just for reference, right, here's the bloody box wiv yor sig un-substed (meanin', this will display wotever yor signature is currently, instead of the bleedin' one above wich will forever display the one as were at the chuffin' time of this writin'.):

RickTommy (edits)

'ope that 'elps! Struth! — Defender1031*Talk 11:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Week 48 Dailies

Sorry for 'astily revertin' yor delete tags a few minutes ago; I didn't realize until i were 'alfway frough wiv the last one that yer were 'alf-right ter stick 'em there. Yer can't 'ave a knees-up wivout a joanna. But like I said in the last edit summary, the delete tag were displayed on the chuffin' main page because it checks for a daily before checkin' for a weekly. There are practical reasons for this. And 'avin' the delete tag on the bloomin' main page 'ave a looks right tacky. I fink yor right that we don't need the daily redirects, but if they are in use even as redirects, right, it's counter-productive ter change them ter the deletion template. This is wot it 'ave a looks like on the main page. <wee>Ironically, right, the linked picture is wot FA's dyin' would 'ave a look like.</wee> User:The chuffin' Knights 'oo Say Ni/sig 07:01, right, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Me Userspace Ban

Okay, it's been more than a year, right, and I 'aven't complained about it nor 'ave I tried ter get 'round it. So can me userspace ban please be lifted, then, eh, mate? RickTommy (edits) 22:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate yor not tryin' ter get 'round it, but yor block is for specific reasons. How 'ave yer shown that yer 'ave addressed them concerns, then, eh, squire? The blokes over at FAS seem just as frustrated at yer as ever, and yer keep reportin' forum posts for inappropriate reasons (wich suggests ter me that yer still 'aven't learned why yor behavior is unacceptable), do wot guvnor! — It's dot com 17:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Proper place for chats

The followin' were originally in the chuffin' deletion chat on Rabbit and pork:Special Text in Strong Bad Emails:

NB: Can me userspace ban please be lifted?
NNBB: Since we're in an 'iatus, right, can we please lighten up on the chuffin' special logos, then? I know I'm bloody well not the only one 'oo 'as found them a bit bovversome (HRWiki:Main Page Rabbit and pork Archive 36#Can we *not* become Google?).

It is inappropriate ter put irrelevant chat in random freads across the wiki. Please confine chat on various topics ter the appropriate rabbit and pork pages.

I addressed yor ban above. As for the chuffin' logo, the ffread yer linked ter had one voice of opposition, right, and 'e were quickly outvoted. Yer mention the bloomin' hiatus. If anyfink, right, that's a reason ter do more logo changes, right, to keep ourselves entertained. I'll get out me spoons. Yer may just 'ave ter come ter grips wiv the fact that the logo is gonna change, right, probably often. If yer would like ter discuss it furffer, at least do so in the right place. — It's dot com 17:27, right, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

About yor dislike of the logos, right, yer can put this in yor personal Monobook stylesheet: #p-logo a { background: url(http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/e/ed/Wiki-kb-c.gif) 35% 50% no-repeat ! Right!important; }

This will keep yor logo the same as it were before the swf logos were introduced. User:Dagoff/sig 00:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Finks yer 'ate

'oo are yer even goin' on ter here? The redundant pipin' yer object ter so much were added nearly free years ago by a user 'oose most recent edit were in August. So it's pretty pointless for yer ter vent yor frustration ter them of us 'oo 'ave ter read yor negative edit summary and 'oo didn't 'ave anyfink ter do wiv it. More importantly, why did it need ter be vented in the first place, eh, guv? Redundant pipin' ain't a big deal. The geezer 'oo added it may not 'ave been orare it were redundant. And regardless, right, it took all of wot, less than a minute ter fix, isit?And this ain't exactly an isolated incident. Yor constantly bein' negative at FAS, right, mainly concernin' redirects, right, wiv no reason uvver than "I don't like it." Yor not likin' sumfink ain't a right good reason why we should 'ave ter put up wiv yor constant negativity. Cor blimey guv! Straight up, put the mockers on bein' so negative. It's just a wiki about daft animal characters, right, and if it frustrates yer this much, right, gahn outside or readin' a butcher's hook would most certainly be a better use of yor time. Heimstern Läufer 14:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Concernin' French subs

Oi, RickTommy. I'm sure yor doin' the Mae West yer can on the chuffin' French subtitles, but yer may 'ave noticed that Meuhcoin ain't right actively checkin' them anymore, nor 'as any uvver native French speaker shown up ter take 'is place. This means that the subtitles are sittin' 'round unchecked, and we right need ter offer only 'igh-quality subtitles ter our viewers. For this reason, I need ter ask yer ter please not make any more for the time bein'. If all the ones yer've made ter this point are later checked by a native French speaker, maybe fings will be different. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer 00:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

It seems yer need ter be reminded of this. Yer were asked not ter create any more, so please respect that request. — Defender1031*Talk 12:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I want ter add that workin' on incomplete subs presents the same problem, right? I understand that it's slightly different, but if yor gonna do so, right, please at least make sure ter include the {{fixtranslation}} template, init?— Defender1031*Talk 13:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Featured Articles

Once again, right, we need ter discuss yor actions in terms of the FA project. If anuvver user reverts an FA yer try ter push frough for lack of consensus, it is not appropriate ter unrevert and claim that there is consensus. The right action of some bloke is revertin' yer in a situation where only two blokes are in favor of sumfink indicates a lack of consensus by definition. Cor blimey guv! Furffer, right, yer only just suggested video games last week. Give it some time for blokes ter support it before just jumpin' in. I would support it. We've also discussed before 'ow it's Mae West not ter slate a FA for less than one week oray, and that's wot yer did. I'm gonnan 'ead over ter the FA page and support it, but please don't go tryin' ter switch it hammer and tack at the bloomin' last second for this week, init?We'll stick it in the chuffin' queue for NEXT week. — Defender1031*Talk 15:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Sandbox, right, nonsense, and inappropriate behavior

Oi there, RickTommy. In case yer 'aven't noticed the bloomin' note in the edit box of the sandbox, it's for test edits, not games and nonsense. Cor blimey guv, would I lie to you? Furffer, right, yor obsession wiv a particular user 'as become inappropriate. A user 'oom, I might add, has not edited the wiki in over a year, right, and about 'oom I can find nowhere where the user themselves provides certain of the facts yor claimin' ter be true about them. I'd like ter point out that this ain't the first time yer 'ave exhibited this sort of obsessive behavior toward anuvver user. Please put the mockers on. — Defender1031*Talk 15:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

More again furffer about policin'

RickTommy, right, since yer 'aven't 'ad a warnin' or block about this in a wile, I'm gonna nicely assume that yer forgot about not policin'. And yer should be glad I'm bloody well doin' so, because uvverwise I would be blockin' yer for yor cheeky behaviour in tryin' ter enforce the deletion of that redirect. That yer were right that it should be deleted ain't the point; as I 'ave said before more than once, yer ain't the bleedin' one ter be makin' enforcement decisions. A sysop would 'ave found the bloody redirect, regardless of yor attempts or lack thereof. To sum up: do not bobbies again or yer will be facin' a block, right, and not a short one. Heimstern Läufer 03:19, right, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Behavior toward uvver users

Recently yer 'ave once again shown a particular interest in anuvver user. The specificity and persistence of yor questions 'ave begun ter cross a certain line. It's not appropriate ter pester anuvver user ter be more active or ter "keep in touch", right, so please do not do this in the bloody future, init?— It's dot com 20:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Um, right, yeah. Yor recent edit ter yor page crossed the line from a wee obsessed ter just plain creepy. I removed the bloomin' entry from yor page. — It's dot com 05:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Block explanation again

RickTommy, yer 'ave once again been policin' the wiki by enforcin' yor preferences at FAS. Yer've been told many times that yor not under any circumstances allowed ter bobbies the bleedin' wiki. Furffermore, right, yor behaviour in this episode illustrates once again why yor not permitted ter do so: once again, yer 'ave done so in an overtly 'ostile manner. As just one example, right, yer told DeFender "*don't" call me RT" wen yer 'ave never told 'im (or any fairy else, as far as I'm orare) that yer dislike bein' called that. In such a case, the chuffin' proper fin' ter do is ter nicely say "DeFender, I'd prefer yer didn't call me that, right, please," not ter snap at some bloke. And wile one snap like that could be brushed off as a bad day, yer've been consistently snappy wiv 'im and Ngamer because they've tried ter put the mockers on yer copping yor way. And that brings me ter my last point. Edit warrin' ter get yor way is unacceptable, right, and yer've been doin' this practically since day one of the new format. As warnings don't seem ter be copping yer ter put the mockers on yor unacceptable behaviour, yor now blocked for two weeks. Wen yer return, please put the mockers on tryin' ter constantly cop yor way at FAS and start workin' cooperatively wiv uvvers. Heimstern Läufer 14:38, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Replacin' dashes

Oi they RickTommy, right, I'm bloody well not quite sure why yer've recently taken ter replacin' — entities wiv actual dashes, right, but I'd like ter point yer ter this chat. It seems there's a preference for continuin' ter use entities for non-alphanumeric characters in general, and for dashes specifically. I just wanted ter point that out ter yer before yer begin spendin' a bit of time ter fix a bunch of stuff that ain't broken, and is in fact better the uvver way. Hope that 'elps. — Defender1031*Talk 17:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

'and

Since yor the auffor and only contributor of the Julie 'and article, right, would yer mind answerin' me question on its rabbit and pork page, eh, guv?

OptimisticFool 01:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)