User talk:RickTommy
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Wits' ind
We haf axed yo' repeatedly not t'po-lice th' wiki. This hyar means tellyng other users whut t'do o' how t'do it. Yo' simply does not seem t'have th' knack fo' when it is appropriate. We've axed yo' t'play fair on th' featured article seleckshun page, not t'edit others' comments, an' not t'swears in edit summaries. Yet, thin's isn't gittin' better. We doesn't seem t'be gittin' through t'yo' at all, even af'er yo' were blocked fo' two weeks fo' disrupshun. So, ah's a-gonna block yo' three weeks. Furthermo'e, ah reckon it'd be bess if yo' stayed away fum th' featured article seleckshun fo' at least a month. — It's dot com 20:48, 24 Augest 2010 (UTC)
RE: Block warnin'
RickTommah, eff'n yer warned about bein' blocked, doesn't try t'fight it by makin' up a bogus excuse as t'whuffo' it was necessary t'do whut yo' did, cuss it all t' tarnation. Jest say so'ry an' doesn't does it agin. We all knows yo' did it so thar is no point fightin' it. Rondleman! 
Stuff I did.Talk. 01:14, 25 Augest 2010 (UTC)
- ah warn't denyin' ennythin'. User:RickTommah/sig 06:55, 8 Ockober 2010 (UTC)
- Loafin' told yo' thet he might block yo', but then yo' got defensive an' said thet th' edit don't matter. Wal it does matter. Look, eff'n yo' evah git a block warnin', doesn't try t'fight it, jest take th' advice yer given, as enny fool kin plainly see. Thanks, Rondleman!
Stuff I did.Talk. 01:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yo' know, Wasd, yer behaviour ain't exackly thet great eifer. Fo' one thin', yo' posted thet comment in th' fust place, despite th' fack thet it does not belong on thet page. Fo' t'other, yo' haf posted messages in talk page archives, as yo' haf done wif mah talk page as fine as Heimstern's. Fo' t'other, yo' warn users about thin's thet they did months ago. Fo' t'other, yo' does thet t'users who ain't edited fo' months. Fo' t'other, yo' post signature len'th messages on other users' talk pages, despite th' fack thet 1) yo' sh'dn't speck a response fum them users, on account o' they ain't edited fo' months, an' 2) th' signature len'th may only apply t'yer computer. An' fo' t'other, yer info'cin' policy by doin' some of them thin's. ah have been blocked befo'e fo' tryin' t'enfo'ce policy, so doesn't be surprised eff'n yo' ind up bein' blocked as fine eff'n yo' corntinue doin' thet so't of stuff. User:RickTommah/sig 06:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Please, varmints, less bust this hyar up. An' ah's mainly speakin' t'Wasd hyar. Whutevah disputes RickTommah has wif th' sysops an' whutevah warnin's we give him is none of yer business. Please attend only t'yer own behaviour. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer
06:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Please, varmints, less bust this hyar up. An' ah's mainly speakin' t'Wasd hyar. Whutevah disputes RickTommah has wif th' sysops an' whutevah warnin's we give him is none of yer business. Please attend only t'yer own behaviour. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer
- Yo' know, Wasd, yer behaviour ain't exackly thet great eifer. Fo' one thin', yo' posted thet comment in th' fust place, despite th' fack thet it does not belong on thet page. Fo' t'other, yo' haf posted messages in talk page archives, as yo' haf done wif mah talk page as fine as Heimstern's. Fo' t'other, yo' warn users about thin's thet they did months ago. Fo' t'other, yo' does thet t'users who ain't edited fo' months. Fo' t'other, yo' post signature len'th messages on other users' talk pages, despite th' fack thet 1) yo' sh'dn't speck a response fum them users, on account o' they ain't edited fo' months, an' 2) th' signature len'th may only apply t'yer computer. An' fo' t'other, yer info'cin' policy by doin' some of them thin's. ah have been blocked befo'e fo' tryin' t'enfo'ce policy, so doesn't be surprised eff'n yo' ind up bein' blocked as fine eff'n yo' corntinue doin' thet so't of stuff. User:RickTommah/sig 06:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Loafin' told yo' thet he might block yo', but then yo' got defensive an' said thet th' edit don't matter. Wal it does matter. Look, eff'n yo' evah git a block warnin', doesn't try t'fight it, jest take th' advice yer given, as enny fool kin plainly see. Thanks, Rondleman!
Suppo't
RickTommah, yer a right fine guy. Keep it real bro. High fives, — Strong Bad
- Thanks, man, as enny fool kin plainly see. User:RickTommah/sig 06:55, 8 Ockober 2010 (UTC)
French subs
Hey, RickTommah. Please doesn't fo'git about addin' {{fixtranslashun}} when yo' does subs so Meuhcoin o' someone knows t'look them on over. Thanks, an' haf a fine time translatin'! Fry mah hide! Heimstern Läufer 
09:38, 27 Seppember 2010 (UTC)
- Purdy please? User:DeFenner1031/sig 03:59, 5 Ockober 2010 (UTC)
- Seriously, yo' allus need t'put th' tag on noo French subtitles thet yo' create.User:Loafin'/sig 19:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Is thar a reason fo' yer avahshun t'{{fixtranslashun}}? It's pow'ful not a bad thin' t'have it on yer subtitles. It don't diminish yer wawk an' effo't in enny way.User:Loafin'/sig 07:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Seriously, yo' allus need t'put th' tag on noo French subtitles thet yo' create.User:Loafin'/sig 19:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Complaints about th' noo FAS fo'mat
RickTommah, has it evah occurred t'yo' thet others might junuinely prefer th' noo fo'mat? Varmints isn't praisin' it t'annoy yo'; they're jest expressin' their honess opinions, which is intirely wifin their rights t'do. Of course, it's also in yer rights t'disagree wif it, but yer cornstantly complainin' about varmints who like th' noo system is annoyin' an' is quickly bea-comin' unacceppably hostile, especially wif edit summaries like this hyar one. Please stop. Heimstern Läufer 13:58, 7 Ockober 2010 (UTC)
- Please make yer complaint in a noo seckshun on this hyar page o' this hyar page. (Preferrably th' latter) User:ColdReackive/sig 20:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Previous edit summary
Whut in tarnation previous edit summary? Edit summaries is fo' th' page histo'y fust, recent changes a distant second, cuss it all t' tarnation. ah reckanize them HRWiki committee pages is a special case, but in juneral yo' need t'stop fixin' docko'who295's name on talk pages. Eff'n he be hankerin' t'sign wif a lowercase letter, autypipe takes care of th' link, an' thar's nothin' in our signature guidelines thet says he has t'sign wif a capital letter. — It's dot com 05:46, 26 Ockober 2010 (UTC)
Further response
thar is some thin's on yer list thet ah agree wif yo' on, as enny fool kin plainly see. Howevah, while i'm not sayin' thet ennythin' hyar specifically annoys me o' don't, ah's gonna give yo' a few pointers.
ah noticed thet yo' added thet it annoyed yo' "When a user creates a noo article an' links t'thet article on ev'ry page thet menshuns it" sho'tly af'er ah linked ev'rythin' ah c'd find t'a noo page thet ah didn't make. ah was reckonin', "but ain't this hyar fine prackice?" It's okay; thar haf been times thet fine prackice has annoyed me too. (See Talk:Compé)
Th' thin' about Strong Mad bein' older than Strong Bad: yessuh, thet is a known fack. an' i haf a li'l brother who is taller an' heavier than ah's, so i knows whar yer a-comin' fum thar. An' by th' logic displayed on yer user page, Strong Sad sh'd be older than both of them, dawgone it. He is known t'be th' yo'ngess of th' three.
An' th' noo Featured Article seleckshun fo'mat: Fo' example, "Varmints praise it on purpose (much like them guys who said they liked Yo'tube's Beta Channels t'annoy th' thousan's of users who absolutely disliked them)": in addishun t'whut Heimstern has said two seckshuns up, last i checked, we had mo'e users who haf a "Thin's thet annoy me" seckshun on their user page than we did complainin' about th' noo FA seleckshun fo'mat. So i'm so'ry t'say, but i doesn't reckon thass a valid comparison, as enny fool kin plainly see. An' I've noticed thet yo've been pointin' out thet yer suggestin' an article fo' th' second time. Th' way th' noo fo'mat wawks, they won't evah need t'be suggested agin (o' thass th' way i unnerstan' it). Honess quesshun: does yo' like thet aspeck of th' fo'mat?
In sho't, ah guess ah w'd be mo'e comfy wif thet seckshun of yer user page eff'n it was less inclusive. but doesn't let me tell yo' how t'shape yer user page; yo' doesn't hafta change a thin' based on whut ah said eff'n yo' doesn't be hankerin' to. User:Th' Knights Who Say Ni/sig 08:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Now yer annoyed by th' fack thet one of the dawgoned-est incredibly useful exclusive features of th' wiki exists? ah find it mighty cornvenient (an' evidently, ev'ryone whose edits yo' linked t'probably does too). Is yo' on Wikia? I've acshully tried linkin' thet way thar, but it don't wawk, an' it don't wawk on Wikipedia. An' frankly, i reckon this hyar logo is awesome. Af'er all, it's still Trogday wifin six months' precishun. I'd like t'encourage yo' t'loosen up a bit. Don't let thin's git t'yo', an' doesn't take ev'rythin' so seriously. Have a lighter attitude about th' situashuns. Yo'll probably injoy it mo'e hyar. Jest a suggesshun. Also, please tell me yo' sar this hyar edit summary a-comin'. btw, whut bothers yo' about thet? it's a mighty he'pful tool thet ah wish other wikis'd use. Incidentally, i offen try t'make mah edit summaries injoyable, but th' one yo' list as yer favo'ite edit summary warn't necessarily one of them; i was jest citin' th' second time "oldie" had been said per cestom on thet page. i'm glad yo' liked it though User:Th' Knights Who Say Ni/sig 04:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- ah also doesn't knows whuffo' yo' call usin' thet feature "abuse". Whut in tarnation, in yer opinion, is it supposed t'be thar fo' eff'n not fo' exackly thet? User:DeFenner1031/sig 15:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Reminner about policin'
RickTommah, given yer recent message t'thet anonny, it seems ah need t'remind yo' thet yer not allered t'po-lice th' wiki. In this hyar case, yet agin, it was not an appropriate message: it was vague (it didn't explain clearly whut, eff'n ennythin', was wrong wif th' anonny's edits) an' was not pow'ful thet accurate a representashun of policy (sayin' "thar's probably a reason we doesn't haf them facks"'d mo'e o' less imply "doesn't add facks t'articles", which is not right representashun of policy at all). So ah's remindin' yo' t'not does this agin. Heimstern Läufer 12:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Block explanashun
Yo' haf been blocked fo' one month fo' thrett upin' t'have t'other user blocked (specifically this hyar edit) when we haftald yo' on over an' on over not t'po-lice other users. (Th' block time is so len'thy on account o' it's yer third block. Shet mah mouth!) Furthermo'e, th' thin's yo' were sayin' t'this kid were not jest rude but on overtly hostile. This hyar is whuffo' we haftald yo' not t'tell other users whut t'do, on account o' when yo' does yer especially mean in th' way yo' hoof it about it. Effeckive once yer block is up, yer restricked fum editin' enny user's talk page other than yer own. (Eff'n yo' try t'git aroun' this hyar restrickshun, yo' may be blocked agin.)
By th' way, as annoyin' an' frestratin' as it may be fo' a noo user t'flood th' recent changes, thar is no rule aginst it. It is out cestom t'discourage it, but thass not th' same thin' as a rule. On account o' floods bother yo' so much, ah have inabled inhanced recent changes in yer preferences, which cornsolidates all changes t'one page into a collapsible (an' igno'able) seckshun. Obviously eff'n it's not t'yer likin' yo' kin turn it back off, but ah encourage yo' t'give it a try. In yer preferences yo' kin also increase th' default number of changes yo' see. When viewin' th' recent changes page, yo' kin hide all changes in a specific namespace (like th' user namespace). — It's dot com 18:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Userpage corntent
Howdy-doo, RickTommah. It's not appropriate t'use yer userpage t'dispareege other users, hyar o' at th' fo'um, dawgone it. So yer a-gonna need t'remove th' content about th' fo'um users "TwiceStyle" an' "HSR3Evah85" fum yer list of HRWiki-related thin's thet annoy yo'. While ah's hyar: Is thar a reason yo' need t'have sech a long list of thin's thet annoy yo' on yer page? It seems pow'ful unnecessarily negative, in fack, varmints might wonner whuffo' yo' even edit hyar eff'n yo' haf aroun' a third of yer userpage devoted t'thin's thet annoy yo'. Mebbe yo' might reckon about trimmin' it down a bit o' removin' it? Jest a thunk (though th' removal of th' content dispareegin' other users is required). Heimstern Läufer 06:47, 30 Seppember 2011 (UTC)
C Majo'
So'ry, but yer page didn't qualify. ah did check an', indeed, In Search of th' Yello Dello Old Vershun had a C-Majo' scale. Howevah, Marzipan's Chareecker Video had an E-Majo' scale, an' Noo Han's didn't haf a majo' scale at all (among other thin's, majo' scales haf eight notes; Strong Bad only sang five etch direckshun). Whut in tarnation's mo'e, th' song fum mascot, in addishun t'not bein' a scale, was in F Majo', not A Mino' - an' even eff'n it was A Mino' (which, admittedly, is th' mino' key most similar t'C Majo'), ah doesn't see th' merit in listin' th' key ev'ry song is in, as enny fool kin plainly see. --Jay (Gobble) 07:36, 24 Ockober 2011 (UTC)
Talk pages an' cornsensus
Typically, discusshuns is whar we discuss articles, not jest throwin' maps t'th' restroom sin'le-phrase declareeshuns into th' crowd. Yer recent "flood" of opinions is all jest opinions on WHAT yo' reckon sh'd be done wif th' article, but give no hint as t'WHY, which don't pow'ful he'p ennyone. To gain consensus, it's impo'tant fo' varmints t'give a fine thunk-out opinion about an article's merits. Yo'll notice, fo' example, on Talk:Balloons, thet ev'rybody ev'rybody, (beginnin' wif mahse'f,) made compellin' argoomnts whuffo' th' article sh'd not stay. Comin' along an' simply sayin' "keep" wifout givin' a reason opposite t'whut th' ress of us haf been sayin' is quite unlikely t'do ennythin' but be igno'ed, cuss it all t' tarnation. Consensus is not a vote. It's a juneral unnerstan'in' among them involved about whut th' opinions is an' whut makes the dawgoned-est sense. Hope thet he'ps! User:DeFenner1031/sig 16:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
{{User:RickTommah/sig}}
Due t'how yo' made th' html on it, it was linkin' all on over th' place. Eff'n yo' use a span tag inside a link, please close it wif </span>. ah have fixed it fo' yo'. Thanks. WP:LikeLakers2 (WP:talk) 05:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Acco'din' t'signature policy, yer signature muss fit into this hyar box: As yo' kin see, it does not. ah's also not quite sho'nuff whuffo' it is thet yer imitatin' thass bupkis's sig, (even gwine as far as linkin' t'HIS userpage fum YOUR sig) but hey, whutevah floats yer boat. Please jest make sho'nuff it fits proper. User:DeFenner1031/sig 11:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Jest fo' reference, hyar's th' box witcher sig un-substed (meanin', this hyar will display whutevah yer signature is currently, instead of th' one above which will fo'evah display th' one as was at th' time of this hyar writin'.): Hope thet he'ps! User:DeFenner1031/sig 11:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Week 48 Dailies
So'ry fo' hastily revahtin' yer delete tags a few minutes ago; ah didn't reckanize until i was ha'fway through wif th' last one thet yo' were ha'f-right t'put them thar. But like ah said in th' last edit summary, th' delete tag was displayed on th' main page on account o' it checks fo' a daily befo'e checkin' fo' a weekly. Thar is prackical reasons fo' this. An' havin' th' delete tag on th' main page looks pow'ful tacky. ah reckon yer right thet we doesn't need th' daily redirecks, but eff'n they is in use even as redirecks, it's counter-produckive t'change them t'th' deleshun template. This is whut it looks like on th' main page. Ironically, th' linked pitcher is whut FA's dyind look like. User:Th' Knights Who Say Ni/sig 07:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Mah Userspace Ban
Okay, it's been mo'e than a year, an' ah ain't complained about it no' haf ah tried t'git aroun' it. So kin mah userspace ban please be lif'ed? User:RickTommah/sig 22:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- ah appreesheeate yer not tryin' t'git aroun' it, but yer block is fo' specific reasons. How haf yo' shown thet yo' haf addressed them corncerns? Th' varmints on over at FAS seem jest as frestrated atcha as evah, an' yo' keep repo'tin' fo'um posts fo' inappropriate reasons (which suggests t'me thet yo' still ain't larned whuffo' yer behavio' is unacceppable). — It's dot com 17:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Right place fo' discusshuns
Th' follerin' was origeenally in th' deleshun discusshun on Talk:Special Text in Strong Bad Emails:
NB: Kin mah userspace ban please be lif'ed?
NNBB: On account o' we is in a hiatus, kin we please lighten up on th' special logos? ah knows ah's not th' only one who has foun' them a bit bothersome (HRWiki:Main Page Talk Archive 36#Kin we *not* become Google?).
It is inappropriate t'put irrelevant discusshun in ran'om threads acrost th' wiki. Please cornfine discusshun on various topics t'th' appropriate talk pages.
ah addressed yer ban above. As fo' th' logo, th' thread yo' linked t'had one voice of opposishun, an' he was quickly outvoted, cuss it all t' tarnation. Yo' menshun th' hiatus. Eff'n ennythin', thass a reason t'do mo'e logo changes, t'keep ourselves intertained, cuss it all t' tarnation. Yo' may jest hafta come t'grips wif th' fack thet th' logo is a-gonna change, probably offen. Eff'n yod like t'discuss it further, at least does so in th' right place. — It's dot com 17:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- About yer dislike of th' logos, yo' kin put this hyar in yer varmintal Monobook stylesheet:
#p-logo a { backgroun': url(http://www.hrwiki.o'g/w/images/e/ed/Wiki-kb-c.gif) 35% 50% no-repeat ! Fry mah hide!impo'tant; }
This hyar will keep yer logo th' same as it was befo'e th' swf logos were intrydooced, cuss it all t' tarnation. Dagoth 00:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Thin's yo' hate
Who is yo' even talkin' t'har? Th' redundant pipin' yo' objeck t'so much was added nearly three years ago by a user whose most recent edit was in Augest. So it's purdy pointless fo' yo' t'vent yer frestrashun t'them of us who hafta read yer negative edit summary an' who didn't haf ennythin' t'do wif it. Mo'e impo'tantly, whuffo' did it need t'be vented in th' fust place? Redundant pipin' is not a trimenjus deal, ah reckon. Th' varmint who added it may not haf been aware it was redundant. An' regardless, it took all of whut, less than a minute t'fix? An' this hyar is not exackly an isolated incident. Yer cornstantly bein' negative at FAS, mainly corncernin' redirecks, wif no reason other than "ah doesn't like it." Yer not likin' sumpin is not a fine reason whuffo' we sh'd hafta put up witcher cornstant negativity. Seriously, stop bein' so negative. It's jest a wiki about dumb animal chareeckers, an' eff'n it frestrates yo' this hyar much, gwine outside o' readin' a book'd most sartinly be a better use of yer time. Heimstern Läufer 14:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Concernin' French subs
Howdy-doo, RickTommah. ah's sho'nuff yer doin' th' bess yo' kin on th' French subtitles, but yo' may haf noticed thet Meuhcoin ain't pow'ful ackively checkin' them ennymo'e, no' has enny other native French speaker shown up t'take his place. This hyar means thet th' subtitles is sittin' aroun' unchecked, an' we pow'ful need t'offer only high-quality subtitles t'our viewers. Fo' this hyar reason, ah need t'ax yo' t'please not make enny mo'e fo' th' time bein'. Eff'n all th' ones yo've made t'this point is later checked by a native French speaker, mebbe thin's will be diffrunt. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer 00:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- It seems yo' need t'be reminded of this. Yo' were axed not t'create enny mo'e, so please respeck thet request. User:DeFenner1031/sig 12:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- ah's hankerin' t'add thet wawkin' on incomplete subs presents th' same problem, dawgone it. ah unnerstan' thet it's slightly diffrunt, but eff'n yer a-gonna does so, please at least make sho'nuff t'include th' {{fixtranslashun}} template. User:DeFenner1031/sig 13:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Featured Articles
Once agin, we need t'discuss yer ackshuns in terms of th' FA projeck. Eff'n t'other user revahts an FA yo' try t'push through fo' lack of cornsensus, it is not appropriate t'unrevaht an' claim thet thar is cornsensus. Th' mighty ackshun of someone is revahtin' yo' in a situashun whar only two varmints is in favo' of sumpin indicates a lack of cornsensus by definishun. Further, yo' only jest suggested video games last week. Shet mah mouth! Give it some time fo' varmints t'suppo't it befo'e jest jumpin' in, as enny fool kin plainly see. ah w'd suppo't it. We've also discussed befo'e how it's bess not t'slate a FA fo' less than one week away, an' thass whut yo' did, cuss it all t' tarnation. ah's gonna haid on over t'th' FA page an' suppo't it, but please doesn't hoof it tryin' t'switch it back at th' last second fo' this hyar week. Shet mah mouth! We'll put it in th' queue fo' NEXT week. Shet mah mouth! User:DeFenner1031/sig 15:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
San'box, fiddlesticks, an' inappropriate behavio'
Hey thar, RickTommah. In case yo' ain't noticed th' note in th' edit box of th' san'box, it's fo' tess edits, not games an' fiddlesticks. Further, yer obsesshun wif a particular user has become inappropriate. A user whom, ah might add, has not edited th' wiki in on over a year, an' about whom ah can find nowhar whar th' user themselves provides sartin of th' facks yer claimin' t'be true about them, dawgone it. I'd like t'point out thet this hyar is not th' fust time yo' haf exhibited this hyar kind of obsessive behavio' toward t'other user. Please stop. User:DeFenner1031/sig 15:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Mo'e agin further about policin'
RickTommah, on account o' yo' ain't had a warnin' o' block about this hyar in a spell, ah's a-gonna nicely assoom thet yo' fo'got about not policin'. An' yo' sh'd be glad ah's doin' so, on account o' otherwise ah w'd be blockin' yo' fo' yer rude behaviour in tryin' t'enfo'ce th' deleshun of thet redireck. Thet yo' were right thet it sh'd be deleted is not th' point; as ah have said befo'e mo'e than once, yo is not th' one t'be makin' info'cement decishuns. A sysop'd haf foun' th' redireck, regardless of yer attempps o' lack tharof. To sum up: does not po-lice agin o' yo' will be facin' a block, an' not a sho't one. Heimstern Läufer 03:19, 9 Augest 2012 (UTC)
Behavio' toward other users
Recently yo' haf once agin shown a particular interess in t'other user. Th' specificity an' persissence of yer quesshuns haf begun t'crost a sartin line. It's not appropriate t'pester t'other user t'be mo'e ackive o' t'"keep in touch", so please does not does this in th' future. — It's dot com 20:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Um, yeah. Yer recent edit t'yer page crosted th' line fum a li'l obsessed t'jest plain creepy. ah removed th' entry fum yer page. — It's dot com 05:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Block explanashun agin
RickTommah, yo' haf once agin been policin' th' wiki by info'cin' yer preferences at FAS. Yo've been told menny times thet yer not unner enny circumstances allered t'po-lice th' wiki. Furthermo'e, yer behaviour in this hyar episode illestrates once agin whuffo' yer not permitted t'do so: once agin, yo' haf done so in an on overtly hostile manner. As jest one example, yo' told DeFenner "*doesn't" call me RT" when yo' haf nevah told him (o' ennyone else, as far as ah's aware) thet yo' dislike bein' called thet. In sech a case, th' right thin' t'do is t'nicely say "DeFenner, I'd prefer yo' didn't call me thet, please," not t'snap at someone. An' while one snap like thet c'd be brushed off as a bad day, yo've been cornsissently snappy wif him an' Ngamer on account o' they've tried t'stop yo' gittin' yer way. An' thet brin's me t'mah last point. Edit warrin' t'getcher way is unacceppable, an' yo've been doin' this hyar prackically on account o' day one of th' noo fo'mat. As warnin's doesn't seem t'be gittin' yo' t'stop yer unacceppable behaviour, yer now blocked fo' two weeks. When yo' return, please stop tryin' t'constantly getcher way at FAS an' start wawkin' cooperatively wif others. Heimstern Läufer 14:38, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Replacin' dashes
Hey they RickTommah, ah's not quite sho'nuff whuffo' yo've recently taken t'replacin' — intities wif acshul dashes, but I'd like t'point yo' t'this discusshun. It seems thar's a preference fo' corntinuin' t'use intities fo' non-alfynoomric chareeckers in juneral, an' fo' dashes specifically. ah jest wanted t'point thet out t'yo' befo'e yo' begin spendin' a lot of time t'fix a bunch of stuff thet ain't busted, an' is in fack better t'other way. Hope thet he'ps. User:DeFenner1031/sig 17:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
