Talk:Jerome
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Revision as of 20:08, 25 March 2007 by The 3000th flare (Talk | contribs)
I don't think this page should be deleted. I think it's a prefectly legit inside joke. Heimstern Läufer 23:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- I don't either, but Seriously apparently really wanted the deletion templates up and was clogging recent changes, so I made them for him/her. Seriously, if you have a good reason to delete it, post it here! — talk Bubsty edits 23:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like seriously removed the template, meaning he/she is fine with the article. I'll take the template off here then. — talk Bubsty edits 23:32, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- I think that it should definitely be deleted. First of all, unlike Dan, it only appears twice. Second of all, we don't have any information other than the fact that he appears to be a boy. Mikatoo 20:50, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
No, seriously, delete
This has 2 appearances, one of which is said for a second on the CD, not even on the site. This is really not noteworthy, I say delete. Dr. Clash 22:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- No. It's a perfectly legit inside joke. With the previous votes, no delete won the debate before... 3-2 No Delete. --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 22:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't quite see the point in this article. Loafing
00:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- The criterion for a running gag is that it have three or more appearances. This one only has two, and so the second appearance is simply a reference to the first — it's noted this way on Strong Badia National Anthem#Inside References. So, until a third appearance, er, appears, I move that this be deleted.
Trey56 00:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with statements, er, stated, above. Delete. — Has Matt? (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Once again, delete.
Dr. Clash 00:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think that, despite the obscurity of it, and only 2 appearances of it, it should stay, because while it doesn't appear much, it is noteworthy. At least, it's noteworthy enough for TBC to mention it more than once. The_3000th_Flare 20:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Once again, delete.
Dr. Clash 00:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with statements, er, stated, above. Delete. — Has Matt? (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- The criterion for a running gag is that it have three or more appearances. This one only has two, and so the second appearance is simply a reference to the first — it's noted this way on Strong Badia National Anthem#Inside References. So, until a third appearance, er, appears, I move that this be deleted.
- I don't quite see the point in this article. Loafing