Talk:Pom Pom and The Poopsmith's Relationship
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Revision as of 05:29, 26 June 2008 by OptimisticFool (Talk | contribs)
Do they even have a relationship? Or is it two characters who occasionally appear in the same toon together every couple of years? --DorianGray 19:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- I haven't really noticed any particular instances in which they've interacted in any particularly noteworthy ways... if they're lumped together, it's usually just because neither of them "talks", like in The House That Gave Sucky Treats or Weclome Back. There's really nothing much that could *go* here... -YK
19:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also the show. Maybe this article could have something to it.. that's three instances that we've come up with where they're paired up seemingly because they lack intelligible speech.
OptimisticFool 22:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- One other instance is Halloween Fairstival. Instead of adding this to a relationships article though, maybe we should just say something about it in the lack of intelligible speech article or make a new article. Homestar-Winner (talk) 23:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- The biggest problem with this article is that the relationship is pretty one-sided, which makes it a trifle lacking in interest. Heimstern Läufer
23:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- The biggest problem with this article is that the relationship is pretty one-sided, which makes it a trifle lacking in interest. Heimstern Läufer
- One other instance is Halloween Fairstival. Instead of adding this to a relationships article though, maybe we should just say something about it in the lack of intelligible speech article or make a new article. Homestar-Winner (talk) 23:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also the show. Maybe this article could have something to it.. that's three instances that we've come up with where they're paired up seemingly because they lack intelligible speech.
All right, I put some effort into it and all appearances seem to be accounted for now. With that, what do people think? I like it and I think we should keep it. But if the consensus is that it shouldn't be a separate article, this info ought to be documented somewhere. IMHO.
OptimisticFool 05:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
