Talk:Tears

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Why not a page on Crying (running gag)?)
(Brilliant!)
Line 13: Line 13:
I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling |smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling |smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 +
:Capital idea! Should we start with a name change of the Tears page, and then edit appropriately?  Since we will be using most of the same material, there's no point [[HRWiki: Once and Only Once|reinventing the wheel]]... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:52, 21 August 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 


A lot of these are from commentaries and interviews, which we tend not to include on pages such as this. In addition, I don't find this notable. delete — Defender1031*Talk 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

keep it! i mean come on, there has been a lot of crying, and its what makes a lot of the toons funny. --Acam30 19:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

tears are normal. it should be gone. Slipknot6477 21:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Only Homestar has actually cried. Twice. Is that "a lot of crying"? No. Delete. – The Chort 12:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I stand with what i say before. whats next? breatheing? standing? sitting? Slipknot6477 15:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Like – The Chort, I have this to say. There were only two from commentaries and where is the interview one? I deleted them so that there is no confusion. Also, this is not about crying (verb), it's about tears (plural noun)Breathing, standing, or sitting don't even relate. Acam30 just made a mistake saying crying. Keep --Super!SantanaDuper! 22:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
If a spoon apears in three or more different unrelated toons, we do not then make a Spoon page. This here is a Spoon page. It's collecting examples of normalcy in the toon and touting it as "wow, we got 3 toons with spoons!" Well, you'd expect to have spoons show up a few times in a few hundred toons, no? The noting of spoons, or tears, is unnecessary, as one would expect them to appear from time to time. Delete. - Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 07:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
So, you're saying there is no Spoon? (Seriously, Delete as irrelevant.) wbwolf (t | ed) 15:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on Crying (running gag) would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've got pages on smiling so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email crying. So...what does everyone think? – The Chort 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Capital idea! Should we start with a name change of the Tears page, and then edit appropriately? Since we will be using most of the same material, there's no point reinventing the wheel... wbwolf (t | ed) 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Tears"
Personal tools