Talk:The Big Lebowski

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Buscemian ≠ Lebowskian)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Buscemian ≠ Lebowskian ==
== Buscemian ≠ Lebowskian ==
I don't believe Strong Sad's reference to Steve Buscemi in [[Sbemail 150?!?]] counts as a Big Lebowski reference.  Buscemi is a film director in his own right - if not experimental, certainly independent.  There's no particularly compelling tie between the nature of SS's storyboards and Buscemi's performance as Donny.  If anything, I suspect it was a convenient rhyme to Fellinian. -- [[User:Mayosolo|Mayosolo]] 23:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't believe Strong Sad's reference to Steve Buscemi in [[Sbemail 150?!?]] counts as a Big Lebowski reference.  Buscemi is a film director in his own right - if not experimental, certainly independent.  There's no particularly compelling tie between the nature of SS's storyboards and Buscemi's performance as Donny.  If anything, I suspect it was a convenient rhyme to Fellinian. -- [[User:Mayosolo|Mayosolo]] 23:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Is this page necessary?==
 +
 +
I don't think that this page is worthy of keeping, and I believe it should be deleted. I know that TBC have referenced the movie on several occassions, but I don't think that it really warrants having a page for it. --[[User:ISlayedTheKerrek|ISlayedTheKerrek]] 19:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:39, 14 August 2006

Buscemian ≠ Lebowskian

I don't believe Strong Sad's reference to Steve Buscemi in Sbemail 150?!? counts as a Big Lebowski reference. Buscemi is a film director in his own right - if not experimental, certainly independent. There's no particularly compelling tie between the nature of SS's storyboards and Buscemi's performance as Donny. If anything, I suspect it was a convenient rhyme to Fellinian. -- Mayosolo 23:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Is this page necessary?

I don't think that this page is worthy of keeping, and I believe it should be deleted. I know that TBC have referenced the movie on several occassions, but I don't think that it really warrants having a page for it. --ISlayedTheKerrek 19:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools