Talk:Old-Timey Strong Bad Evolution

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
:The [[:Image:1936 Strong Bad.png|image]] seems to be fine. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
:The [[:Image:1936 Strong Bad.png|image]] seems to be fine. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
::It might be just me, but the cell that's supposed to contain the image shows up empty for me. - [[User:Ramblin' Wreck of Spelling Check|RWoSC]] 03:30, 24 October 2005 (UTC), aka 212.94.80.106

Revision as of 03:30, 24 October 2005

This shouldn't be deleted because it is the only 1936 character evolution page.

I agree.

The changes are so minor that I really don't think this needs to be here. But, I'm not the one who put the deletion tag on the article, so I really don't care either way. It's not my decision. —FireBird|Talk 15:24, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The changes are bigger than the ones Homsar has gone through, and I think they're quite noticeable. Poopsmith Z

Second --Technochocolate 21:32, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Very true. Keep it, I say! --Shippinator Mandy

It is true Homsar has fewer changes than this, and this the only 1936 evolution page. Also, 1936 Strong Bad is one of my favorite characters.-Trogdor da Burninator Jun 2005

Since this is the only page that has evolution of a character from 1936, it shouldn't be deleted. Because then... there would be no 1936 character evolution. What's the point of deleting it anyway?-Darklinkskywalker

They're hateful. --Technochocolate 01:25, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I say keep it. the changes are very noticeable and are worth of their own page --Insanimaniac2005

Well the way I see it, noone has come forward in favor of deleting this. I have taken the liberty of removing the deleted tag. This should stay put. If anyone disagrees, speak up. -- Tony Stony


Link to the latest version is missing or broken, requesting image upload. - 212.94.80.106

The image seems to be fine. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
It might be just me, but the cell that's supposed to contain the image shows up empty for me. - RWoSC 03:30, 24 October 2005 (UTC), aka 212.94.80.106
Personal tools