Talk:Shark-Tooth Bubs
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(→Real) |
(Representative Image) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Is this puppet realy made by a company? | Is this puppet realy made by a company? | ||
: Allegedly, yes. But despite it being treated as a puppet, it's actually a small doll. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 04:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC) | : Allegedly, yes. But despite it being treated as a puppet, it's actually a small doll. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 04:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Representative Image == | ||
| + | Is there any desire to make representative images for articles from the website, rather than from the DVD? If there is, perhaps this article can use something from Main Page 25 or Dangeresque: Puppet Squad instead of the current one. [[User:TimMierz|TimMierz]] 20:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:20, 18 March 2009
Other Puppet Character Articles
I'm thinking it's a good idea to have other articles for the puppets. They play a fairly important roll in the Homestar universe. Besides, Shark-Tooth Bubs is one of the least shown ones, so if he gets an article, other puppets should definately get one. —FireBird|Talk 21:12, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I agree. — It's dot com 21:13, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I was considering adding a section on the article for Bubs, but I figured that I could add enough information to warrant a separate article for Shark-Tooth. I also agree - each puppet should have its own article. I see a The Cheat, Homestar, and Strong Bad puppets as articles in the future. —THE PAPER PREEEOW 21:23, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I can see those articles too. The Marshie puppet, not so much. He's appeared quite less than the others. Although, lemme tell ya, my initial reaction was that Shark-Tooth Bubs was unique enough to have his own article, since he was a production mistake... But, after careful consideration, I think the other puppets deserve their own articles too. They're unique enough in the fact that (save for The Cheat) they cannot be purchased by anyone else. --DorianGray
- I don't know... I was kind of thinking about putting Shark-Tooth Bubs into the Bubs article, as well as similar sections in other character pages. I don't know if puppets should get their own page. A redirect could suffice instead of a page for Shark-Tooth. —BazookaJoe 21:29, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Shark-tooth bubs deserves it more than any other puppet, mainly because it was a production mistake. Rogue Leader / (my talk)
- Regardless of whether the Homestar, The Cheat, and Strong Bad puppets get an article, I think this one on Shark-Tooth Bubs is good because he's clearly not the same as regular Bubs. He even has a different voice actor. — It's dot com 21:33, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I have an idea! Why not creat one huge puppet article? I can help in some way with that, I just need some moore time to get used to the programming of the website.Thechamp 21:35, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I think the puppet section of Minor Alternate Versions will suffice for now until more information about these puppets is known. —THE PAPER PREEEOW 01:38, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I have an idea! Why not creat one huge puppet article? I can help in some way with that, I just need some moore time to get used to the programming of the website.Thechamp 21:35, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Regardless of whether the Homestar, The Cheat, and Strong Bad puppets get an article, I think this one on Shark-Tooth Bubs is good because he's clearly not the same as regular Bubs. He even has a different voice actor. — It's dot com 21:33, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Shark-tooth bubs deserves it more than any other puppet, mainly because it was a production mistake. Rogue Leader / (my talk)
- I don't know... I was kind of thinking about putting Shark-Tooth Bubs into the Bubs article, as well as similar sections in other character pages. I don't know if puppets should get their own page. A redirect could suffice instead of a page for Shark-Tooth. —BazookaJoe 21:29, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I can see those articles too. The Marshie puppet, not so much. He's appeared quite less than the others. Although, lemme tell ya, my initial reaction was that Shark-Tooth Bubs was unique enough to have his own article, since he was a production mistake... But, after careful consideration, I think the other puppets deserve their own articles too. They're unique enough in the fact that (save for The Cheat) they cannot be purchased by anyone else. --DorianGray
- I was considering adding a section on the article for Bubs, but I figured that I could add enough information to warrant a separate article for Shark-Tooth. I also agree - each puppet should have its own article. I see a The Cheat, Homestar, and Strong Bad puppets as articles in the future. —THE PAPER PREEEOW 21:23, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
What chicken man movie is he talking about? Is it Chicken Run? It it what else? I can't think.
BAWK BAWK BAWK! CHICKEN MAN! He's everywhere, he's everywhere! — That's from an old radio comedy called Chicken Man, my dad told me about it. It's from the forties, or sometime thereabouts. Does that answer your question? I mean, it does if your question was 'Who is Chicken Man? --Homfrog 00:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Real
Is this puppet realy made by a company?
- Allegedly, yes. But despite it being treated as a puppet, it's actually a small doll. --Jay (Gobble) 04:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Representative Image
Is there any desire to make representative images for articles from the website, rather than from the DVD? If there is, perhaps this article can use something from Main Page 25 or Dangeresque: Puppet Squad instead of the current one. TimMierz 20:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
