Talk:The Cheat's Privileges
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
												
			
		| DorianGray  (Talk | contribs)  (Good question.) | m  (proper template) | ||
| (includes 10 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{deletedtalk|merge=privileges}} | ||
| I think this is all pretty well covered on [[privileges]]. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 21:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC) | I think this is all pretty well covered on [[privileges]]. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 21:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I second that.  And even if it wasn't, it's not really an inside joke. -[[User:Unknownwarrior33|Unknownwarrior33]] 00:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | :I second that.  And even if it wasn't, it's not really an inside joke. -[[User:Unknownwarrior33|Unknownwarrior33]] 00:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Okay, a year later, why ''is'' this here? It does seem redundant. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ::Okay, a year later, why ''is'' this here? It does seem redundant. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Yep... It's not like they were ever mentioned again, either. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | :::Yep... It's not like they were ever mentioned again, either. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Well, it hasn't been deleted.  You wanna kill it, fine.  Kill it if you must. The lone voice of the creator can hardly defend an article if I have 4 outside influences voting against it.  Just adds to the red side of the ratio.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::In other words, you're unnecessarily making this personal again. Would you care to expound on the merits of the ''article'' rather than the person who made it? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::::This can easily be shown on [[privileges]]. In fact, it's already ON that page. So '''delete'''. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 21:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::I'm not making this personal at all.  I'm saying the likelihood of me being able to defend this by myself is none because I have nothing to say which would defend it at all.  I can't make an argument for it.  If nobody can make an argument for it, the vote for deletion is thus unanimous.  The course of action should, from that point, be obvious.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::::C'mon now. There had to be a reason you created it in the first place. What was it? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::::Such a long time ago...surely it was one of those desperation articles, something to get me on my feet.  Kinda like [[LELLOWTAPE]].  Should have just stuck with the one that [[Strong Bad's Technology|worked]].  I honestly can't remember WHY I created this.  <s>All I will do at this point is weakly suggest some kind of move...or merge...or something that somehow involves the Medallion Gold Plus Club.  I can't exactly seem to piece together what it would look like, or how the content would be any different from this.</s>  Actually, scratch that.  The content would be the same.  I can't think of what to do with it...aaah.  Now my brain is cluttered.  Come back to me later, teacher.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 22:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::::::Let's just '''redirect''' this page to privileges. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I redirected this page to [[privileges]] per the above consensus. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 22:29, 8 March 2008
|   | 
I think this is all pretty well covered on privileges. — Has Matt? (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- I second that.  And even if it wasn't, it's not really an inside joke. -Unknownwarrior33 00:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, a year later, why is this here? It does seem redundant. — It's dot com 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yep... It's not like they were ever mentioned again, either. --DorianGray 21:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
- Okay, a year later, why is this here? It does seem redundant. — It's dot com 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- In other words, you're unnecessarily making this personal again. Would you care to expound on the merits of the article rather than the person who made it? — It's dot com 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
- This can easily be shown on privileges. In fact, it's already ON that page. So delete. Bluebry 21:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not making this personal at all.  I'm saying the likelihood of me being able to defend this by myself is none because I have nothing to say which would defend it at all.  I can't make an argument for it.  If nobody can make an argument for it, the vote for deletion is thus unanimous.  The course of action should, from that point, be obvious.· · T2|Things 21:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- C'mon now. There had to be a reason you created it in the first place. What was it? — It's dot com 21:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Such a long time ago...surely it was one of those desperation articles, something to get me on my feet.  Kinda like LELLOWTAPE.  Should have just stuck with the one that worked.  I honestly can't remember WHY I created this.  All I will do at this point is weakly suggest some kind of move...or merge...or something that somehow involves the Medallion Gold Plus Club. I can't exactly seem to piece together what it would look like, or how the content would be any different from this.Actually, scratch that. The content would be the same. I can't think of what to do with it...aaah. Now my brain is cluttered. Come back to me later, teacher.· · T2|Things 22:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
- Such a long time ago...surely it was one of those desperation articles, something to get me on my feet.  Kinda like LELLOWTAPE.  Should have just stuck with the one that worked.  I honestly can't remember WHY I created this.  
 
- C'mon now. There had to be a reason you created it in the first place. What was it? — It's dot com 21:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
- I'm not making this personal at all.  I'm saying the likelihood of me being able to defend this by myself is none because I have nothing to say which would defend it at all.  I can't make an argument for it.  If nobody can make an argument for it, the vote for deletion is thus unanimous.  The course of action should, from that point, be obvious.· · T2|Things 21:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
- This can easily be shown on privileges. In fact, it's already ON that page. So delete. Bluebry 21:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
I redirected this page to privileges per the above consensus.  Trey56 17:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Trey56 17:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
