Category talk:Toons
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(→Full-length category: Re: Convertulator) |
(→Big Toons: I just wanted to use that pun...) |
||
| (includes 7 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Oh. Wight. Um, I'll PM all the helpers about it. Hold tight. -- [[User:InterruptorJones|InterruptorJones]] 13:17, 20 Aug 2004 (MST) | :::Oh. Wight. Um, I'll PM all the helpers about it. Hold tight. -- [[User:InterruptorJones|InterruptorJones]] 13:17, 20 Aug 2004 (MST) | ||
::: Done. -- [[User:InterruptorJones|InterruptorJones]] 13:24, 20 Aug 2004 (MST) | ::: Done. -- [[User:InterruptorJones|InterruptorJones]] 13:24, 20 Aug 2004 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Category Theory== | ||
| + | When applying a category to a page don't include both the parent and the child categories. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Example 1''': | ||
| + | Given the theoretical category structure | ||
| + | |||
| + | Toons--> Shorts --> Holiday Shorts | ||
| + | |||
| + | A new short toon for Decemberween would not be classified both as a "Holiday Shorts" and "Toons", Just "Holiday Shorts" is suitable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However you can categorize in multiple branches of a structure | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Example 2''': | ||
| + | Given the theoretical category structure | ||
| + | |||
| + | Toons--> Shorts --> Holiday Shorts | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |--->Powered by The Cheat | ||
| + | |||
| + | A new short toon for Decemberween by The Cheat could be classified both as a "Holiday Shorts" and "Powered by The Cheat". I think most people get this, but the tutorial is here for neophytes. | ||
| + | [[User:Drhaggis|Drhaggis]] 17:36, 19 Sep 2004 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Big Toons == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Right now, all the Big Toons and uncategorized toons are thrown together in the same category, while all the other toon types have their own. I think Big Toons should get their own category. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 06:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Does anyone agree? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 01:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | :If there are no objections, I'll just go ahead and create the Big Toons category. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 04:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Yup, I find it odd that Big Toons aren't already in their own category. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 20:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::I'd say, Gopher it! Even a category for miscellaneous toons or something to that effect might be okay too? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 01:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 01:23, 5 January 2019
[edit] Full-length category
After taking a look, I'm thinking we might want to have a "Full-Length Toons" category as well. That would allow for every toon to also be in a sub-category. Does that make sense? -- Tom 10:48, 20 Aug 2004 (MST)
- I think that makes sense. P.S. have you checked out the Convertulator yet? -- InterruptorJones 10:53, 20 Aug 2004 (MST)
- Whuh is the converterator? I assume since I can't see that post, then it's on the mod forum...Anywho...what it it!!??? -- AgentSeethroo 13:01, 20 Aug 2004 (MST)
- Oh. Wight. Um, I'll PM all the helpers about it. Hold tight. -- InterruptorJones 13:17, 20 Aug 2004 (MST)
- Done. -- InterruptorJones 13:24, 20 Aug 2004 (MST)
- Whuh is the converterator? I assume since I can't see that post, then it's on the mod forum...Anywho...what it it!!??? -- AgentSeethroo 13:01, 20 Aug 2004 (MST)
[edit] Category Theory
When applying a category to a page don't include both the parent and the child categories.
Example 1: Given the theoretical category structure
Toons--> Shorts --> Holiday Shorts
A new short toon for Decemberween would not be classified both as a "Holiday Shorts" and "Toons", Just "Holiday Shorts" is suitable.
However you can categorize in multiple branches of a structure
Example 2: Given the theoretical category structure
Toons--> Shorts --> Holiday Shorts | |--->Powered by The Cheat
A new short toon for Decemberween by The Cheat could be classified both as a "Holiday Shorts" and "Powered by The Cheat". I think most people get this, but the tutorial is here for neophytes. Drhaggis 17:36, 19 Sep 2004 (MST)
[edit] Big Toons
Right now, all the Big Toons and uncategorized toons are thrown together in the same category, while all the other toon types have their own. I think Big Toons should get their own category. 
Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 06:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Does anyone agree? Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 01:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- If there are no objections, I'll just go ahead and create the Big Toons category. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 04:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yup, I find it odd that Big Toons aren't already in their own category. DEI
DAT
VM
┌datvm center\super contra┘ 20:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say, Gopher it! Even a category for miscellaneous toons or something to that effect might be okay too? --Stux 01:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yup, I find it odd that Big Toons aren't already in their own category. DEI
DAT
VM
