Talk:Times
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Diggety leeted!) |
(→What's the joke?: Delete.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | ::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC) | ::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::I add my support for '''delete''', fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:38, 23 June 2009
What's the joke?
Okay, what's the specific running gag here? A page that simply lists instances of the word times (most of which are either perfectly grammatical or nearly so) is not worthy of inclusion. — It's dot com 22:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. There's nothing particularly unusual about these usages. -132.183.138.223 23:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I just noticed this. I agree too, there's nothing really special about the word itself. It's used in odd places because of the jokes going on there at the "times", not actually because of anything intrinsic to the word itself. — Defender1031*Talk 18:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nothing special about the word Times here. Delete. – The Chort 16:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. Deleted. Bed, bath and be-yond. --Jay (Gobble) 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Diggity. This is more so plural instead of singular, already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --Jellote 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- I add my support for delete, fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here.
OptimisticFool 01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- I add my support for delete, fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here.
- Diggity. This is more so plural instead of singular, already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --Jellote 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. Deleted. Bed, bath and be-yond. --Jay (Gobble) 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nothing special about the word Times here. Delete. – The Chort 16:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- I just noticed this. I agree too, there's nothing really special about the word itself. It's used in odd places because of the jokes going on there at the "times", not actually because of anything intrinsic to the word itself. — Defender1031*Talk 18:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
