Talk:Featuring Oneself
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m |
Bad Bad Guy (Talk | contribs) m (Talk:Featuring Self moved to Talk:Featuring Oneself: per rename discussion on talk page) |
||
| (includes 5 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Hmm... [[Featuring Oneself]] might be a little better... maybe there's something better out there, though. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | :Hmm... [[Featuring Oneself]] might be a little better... maybe there's something better out there, though. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Yes, [[Featuring Oneself]] was what I thought of when I saw this article in Recent Changes.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Perhaps the article could simply be named [[Featuring]], [[Featured Characters]], [[Guest Stars]], or something along those lines and include a section about featuring oneself. This would make for a larger article as well just in case the "Featuring Self" gag doesn't go very far. --Merond e [[User:195.229.236.250|195.229.236.250]] 10:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Name it [[Featuring Themselves]]. I dont know. {{User:Justin Master of Nature/sig}} 23:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::I agree with [[Featuring Oneself]], it seems to be the best fit. Plus it's a cooler commando name. --{{User:TheCheat/sig}} 20:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Mr. Cheaterson == | == Mr. Cheaterson == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 16: | ||
What about The Cheat? He typically puts himself in his PbTC cartoons. I mean, there's a [[Powered by The Cheat Cameo Appearances|whole page]] on his appearances. I think the subjects are somewhat related. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | What about The Cheat? He typically puts himself in his PbTC cartoons. I mean, there's a [[Powered by The Cheat Cameo Appearances|whole page]] on his appearances. I think the subjects are somewhat related. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Does {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Featuring_Self&curid=39465&diff=523174&oldid=523165&rcid=479904 this}} work? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 21:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | :Does {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Featuring_Self&curid=39465&diff=523174&oldid=523165&rcid=479904 this}} work? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 21:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Indeed it does. I was clearly editing early in the... afternoon. Early after waking, anyway. S'why I didn't think of it. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 06:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 01:26, 15 March 2008
[edit] New Name
Featuring Self doesn't do it for me. Any suggestions for an improvement? 
OptimisticFool 20:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm... Featuring Oneself might be a little better... maybe there's something better out there, though.
Trey56 21:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, Featuring Oneself was what I thought of when I saw this article in Recent Changes. Loafing
23:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, Featuring Oneself was what I thought of when I saw this article in Recent Changes. Loafing
- Perhaps the article could simply be named Featuring, Featured Characters, Guest Stars, or something along those lines and include a section about featuring oneself. This would make for a larger article as well just in case the "Featuring Self" gag doesn't go very far. --Merond e 195.229.236.250 10:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Name it Featuring Themselves. I dont know.
Master of Nature
23:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Name it Featuring Themselves. I dont know.
- I agree with Featuring Oneself, it seems to be the best fit. Plus it's a cooler commando name. -- TheCheat(talk · edits) 20:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mr. Cheaterson
What about The Cheat? He typically puts himself in his PbTC cartoons. I mean, there's a whole page on his appearances. I think the subjects are somewhat related. --DorianGray 20:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Does this work? Homestar-Winner (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed it does. I was clearly editing early in the... afternoon. Early after waking, anyway. S'why I didn't think of it. --DorianGray 06:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
