Talk:Keyswordtar
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Delete?: question) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::Hmmm. Items have always been a very iffy category. There's not really any offical standard or anything in the way of Items yet, but the way I like to see it is this: If it's used 3 or more times, a page doesn't hurt. If it's part of a series of pages, such as [[Items#Music Players|Music Players]] or [[Items#Computers|Computers]], then it also doesn't hurt. In this particular case, I think this article should stay. Despite it being just a drawing of such; It fits in both in the category of Instruments and Weapons, which are both good sized series...es. (A good, yet still managable number of items). Therefore if it comes down to votes, I feel this item should stay as-is. As a side point, I strongly feel that [[Items]] needs cleanup and revision, but I'm not really up to trying to fix it at this time. But I'ma adding it to my to-do list right now. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | :::Hmmm. Items have always been a very iffy category. There's not really any offical standard or anything in the way of Items yet, but the way I like to see it is this: If it's used 3 or more times, a page doesn't hurt. If it's part of a series of pages, such as [[Items#Music Players|Music Players]] or [[Items#Computers|Computers]], then it also doesn't hurt. In this particular case, I think this article should stay. Despite it being just a drawing of such; It fits in both in the category of Instruments and Weapons, which are both good sized series...es. (A good, yet still managable number of items). Therefore if it comes down to votes, I feel this item should stay as-is. As a side point, I strongly feel that [[Items]] needs cleanup and revision, but I'm not really up to trying to fix it at this time. But I'ma adding it to my to-do list right now. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Exuse me if I sound stupid, but what exactly needs cleaning up in Items? It seems fine to me. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 00:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::This should be deleted. It was shown barely, and only once. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 00:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ::::This should be deleted. It was shown barely, and only once. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 00:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:48, 18 February 2006
Delete?
As there is no real key-sword-tar, does it merit its own page? Or should this be merged with Bubs' Keytar, possibly renaming that page Keytar? Qermaq 00:18, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind a bit of discussion on renaming several of the "[Character]'s [Item]" type pages to just the item (It's been bugging me for a while, I just haven't got around to saying anything about it), but I think this page has enough content to be a page of it's own. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 00:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- My concern, though, arises from the similarity here as with Lazor Gun, which is currently proposed for deletion. This is only slightly more "real" than the Lazor Gun, in that it's an actual wood-and-paint version of one while the Lazor Gun is just imaginary. But it's still not real to the H*R universe. Qermaq 00:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Items have always been a very iffy category. There's not really any offical standard or anything in the way of Items yet, but the way I like to see it is this: If it's used 3 or more times, a page doesn't hurt. If it's part of a series of pages, such as Music Players or Computers, then it also doesn't hurt. In this particular case, I think this article should stay. Despite it being just a drawing of such; It fits in both in the category of Instruments and Weapons, which are both good sized series...es. (A good, yet still managable number of items). Therefore if it comes down to votes, I feel this item should stay as-is. As a side point, I strongly feel that Items needs cleanup and revision, but I'm not really up to trying to fix it at this time. But I'ma adding it to my to-do list right now. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 00:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
