Talk:Food Still In Peel or Package
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(not stub) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:What aren't you sure about? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] | :What aren't you sure about? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] | ||
::I'm not sure if this page is worth having or not. It seems ''too'' obscure. But if it has to stay, lets change it to a less confusing name.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 02:22, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | ::I'm not sure if this page is worth having or not. It seems ''too'' obscure. But if it has to stay, lets change it to a less confusing name.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 02:22, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == not stub == | ||
| + | |||
| + | this isn't really a stub, right? we know all there is to know!--{{User:Benol/sig}} 02:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:23, 24 November 2005
I don't know about anyone else, but this page seems pointless to me. There's just nothing to it. I don't see the need for a page that lists about 4 items of food with a "peel or packet". Anyone else agree? Homestramy20|Talk 02:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- agreed--
Benol, aka Coach B 02:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Well, it's definitely a running gag, which should be chronicled. And it's likely that it will grow as time goes on. — It's dot com 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this. A name change. Like Un-opened Food Items or something.--
Bkmlb(talk to me·stuff I did) 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- anyways, shouldn't it be in the food and drink category?--
Benol, aka Coach B 02:19, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- anyways, shouldn't it be in the food and drink category?--
- What aren't you sure about? — It's dot com
- I'm not sure if this page is worth having or not. It seems too obscure. But if it has to stay, lets change it to a less confusing name.--
Bkmlb(talk to me·stuff I did) 02:22, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this page is worth having or not. It seems too obscure. But if it has to stay, lets change it to a less confusing name.--
not stub
this isn't really a stub, right? we know all there is to know!--
Benol, aka Coach B 02:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
