Editing Talk:Two More Eggs

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
Current revision Your text
Line 55: Line 55:
:::::I changed it a bit, so that the "Shorts" and the "Similarities to Homestar Runner" section were seperate. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
:::::I changed it a bit, so that the "Shorts" and the "Similarities to Homestar Runner" section were seperate. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
::::::I'm not sure i'd separate the sections. I'd suggest just putting the references directly as sub-bullets under the episode' entries in the list themselves and making the heading something like "Episodes and their Homestar Runner References" or something. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 10:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
::::::I'm not sure i'd separate the sections. I'd suggest just putting the references directly as sub-bullets under the episode' entries in the list themselves and making the heading something like "Episodes and their Homestar Runner References" or something. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 10:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
-
 
===New Page Design===
===New Page Design===
:::::::I think we should do [[User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sandbox|something like this]]. It's a good way to organize the page better, and we have a section for H*R references. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
:::::::I think we should do [[User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sandbox|something like this]]. It's a good way to organize the page better, and we have a section for H*R references. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Line 65: Line 64:
::::::::I like this one! I agree. (BTW: The Brown Boats trailer was a Hector & Kovitch one, and the educational benefits parody was something called "Jamble Bears".) [[User:AnimaRiley|AnimaRiley]] 06:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
::::::::I like this one! I agree. (BTW: The Brown Boats trailer was a Hector & Kovitch one, and the educational benefits parody was something called "Jamble Bears".) [[User:AnimaRiley|AnimaRiley]] 06:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
:So now that's 3 people who agree with this idea. Should we put it on the page? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 02:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
:So now that's 3 people who agree with this idea. Should we put it on the page? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 02:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
-
Now that all the episodes of Season 1 are released, should we change the page to [[User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sandbox|this]]? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 
-
:That was a very subtle plug! Seriously, though, I think your design is better for the page, mostly because it's more detailed. Something tells me it won't be the prevailing opinion, though, since this show isn't Homestar Runner. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 01:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 
-
::I like the table layout a lot better as well. Go for it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 
== Delete ==
== Delete ==
Line 94: Line 90:
Just to clarify, the standard Two More Eggs publishing schedule is 12:00 AM EST on Tuesdays, so it can appear to be published a day early for most people west of Georgia. (I don't know how the publishing date on YT works, but I'm assuming it's rounded to your timezone or based on YT's west-coast timezone) - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 01:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Just to clarify, the standard Two More Eggs publishing schedule is 12:00 AM EST on Tuesdays, so it can appear to be published a day early for most people west of Georgia. (I don't know how the publishing date on YT works, but I'm assuming it's rounded to your timezone or based on YT's west-coast timezone) - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 01:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
-
 
-
== We need hamster paste! ==
 
-
 
-
Are we sure that TBC are the ones writing the descriptions for youtube? (And If not, do we care?) I'm starting to suspect not, as they're not the sort to usually make this kind of glaring mistake, which could only be made by someone not familiar with Cake Show. It's not a hamster who had his paste stolen! It's a gopher! Gopher paste! Not hamster paste! Ahem. Anyway, even if it's not TBC writing the descriptions, should they still be included anyway, as they are "official"? Also, are we doing a remarks-type section on these where this comment would fit? Did no one else even notice this? Am I being weird and just going on for way too long in this comment about a non-Homestar TBC production that no one really cares about? Probably. End of comment. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 
-
:I always thought it was Disney writing the descriptions. They just sort of seemed... un-TBC-like. For example: "Dooble sings his signature theme song while exploring the world and going on many adventures. His life is a joy box!" Also, in "She Whispered", the band's name is Beard-antler, but the description says "Beard-Antler", with a capital A. I guess we can put these in the trivia section or something. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 
-
::Yeah, I agree— my guess has always been that they're the XD's descriptions. They're too uncreative to be The Brothers Chaps. And yeah, that's a good idea— we should write the mistakes/inconsistencies in Trivia. Those kinds of Facts are always Fun. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 12:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 
-
:::I think we should definitely list the descriptions and mention the inconsistencies. However, I would like to note that the descriptions also vary by region. The UK versions all have totally different descriptions, for example ("I think you should go and buy that game Kovitch..."). That blurs the line indicating which one is "official" (although the US one is most likely, just because both Disney and TBC operate out primarily out of the US). So would it make sense to also list all of the unique non-US descriptions? --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 14:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Least Greatest Caper Ever ==
 
-
 
-
Turns out somebody copy+pasted our article straight to [[Wikipedia:Two More Eggs|the Wikipedias]]. How interesting. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 22:56, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 
-
:We need to figure out how to write a Wikipedia article...like...without having to actually write a Wikipedia article! --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 23:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 
-
::They also copied some of the [[TVTropes:WebAnimation/TwoMoreEggs|TV Tropes article]]. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Qblepon: Orixinal 90'X ==
 
-
 
-
would the aforementioned cartoon's title sequence be similar to [[Xeriouxly Forxe]]'s sequence? at least the part where each of the characters shown are switched to more detailed drawings of themselves?
 
-
:Yeah, I think you're right. The fact that it's called "original 90's" combined with the characters being zapped into cooler versions of themselves... definitely. Someone even made a reference to that in a comment on that video. It definitely has more to do with Xeriouxly Forxe than with 20X6. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 01:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General References - Voice Similarities?==
 
-
Several of the items in the "General References" section have to do with characters having similar voices to characters in the HR universe. I don't think that these are noteworthy. They're all voiced by the same actor, so there's naturally going to be some resemblance. There's no reason to assume it's deliberate, and it's not particularly unexpected. Does anyone else think those items should be removed from the list? - [[Special:Contributions/24.197.125.240|24.197.125.240]] 02:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 
-
:Yes. I also think that most of the other references should go - that is to say, anything TME references that H*R just happens to as well, as opposed to TME blatantly referencing H*R. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 
-
::I disagree. The voices are clearly Matt doing the same style for the same type of character, and it's notable when they reference the same thing, because it's an indication that TBC like to reference the same things in their other works that they do in H*R. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 08:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 
-
:::Well, I should mention that it could fool newbies into thinking that only TBC make such references. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 05:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===Compromise===
 
-
How about splitting the similarities from the blatant references? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 05:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 
-
:How so? (P.S. This is an interesting idea, but I still kind of agree with everyone else.) {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 
-
::It's a good idea in theory, but the problem is where the line is between "similarities to H*R" and "references to H*R". The majority of the similarities seem to be the use of the same running gags as H*R has, things such as [[G]], [[why come]], and [[mashing]]. Are those similarities or direct references? Seems like some cases are closer to just use of the same gag, and some are closer to nods at a specific use in a specific H*R toon, but it seems like it's all going to end up being very arbitrary, messy, and subject to unresolvable, opinion-based disagreement. Unless you can come up with a clear-cut rule for what qualifies as what, I don't really see a split working well. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Image ==
 
-
 
-
I think the page image should be changed to the title screen. It makes more sense and kinda fits better. Or alternatively, we could have two images... but I dunno. One might be enough. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 
-
:I'll agree with that. Dooble's the most iconic mini-series, but it's not the only one. Keep it to one image; change it to the title. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 23:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Panda Bractice! Swatch online, now! ==
 
-
 
-
We knew TBC were using the rebranded Adobe Animate (and therefore Creative Cloud) before (see Francis Sweetmouth), but now it seems like they've committed to it. A quick search for "Panda Bractice" leads to [https://color.adobe.com/explore/?q=userId%3A937660 this page] of color swatches. The user is called "mikechaps" and there are four swatches labeled "Panda Bractice", "Panda Bractice 2", "3" and "4" respectively. The colors are very similar to those used in Panda Bractice, though most aren't used 1:1. In addition, there's a swatch named "elsa" that matches the colors of "Anna-Elsa" from the [[The Brothers Chaps' Side Projects#YouTube|The Paul and Storm Nondenominational Perennial Somethingorother]] (along with a few extra colors). There are also other swatches that I can't immediately connect to anything, although some of the color combinations do look familiar. The page for the Panda Bractice swatch was apparently updated on January 27 according to Google (although you could take or leave that information; sometimes Google has been showing unusual update timestamps for pages lately).
 
-
<br>Anyhow, is this worth delving into or mentioning at all... anywhere?
 
-
<br><small>Seriously, I have no idea!</small>--{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 23:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 

Your changes will be visible immediately. If you would like to test or practice editing, please do so in the sandbox. You are encouraged to create, expand, and improve upon articles; however, bad edits to articles are watched for and will be quickly removed.


CAPTCHA Image
Image Code:
Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
You are required to enter a code from an image in order to perform certain operations. This image is designed to protect the site from vandalism. If the images are too obscured to read, just give it your best shot and a new image will be shown next time. If you are visually impaired or limited to text-based browsing, you can contact the site administrator and something can be arranged. The code is not case-sensitive.

The Homestar Runner Wiki is neither owned by nor affiliated with homestarrunner.com. Much of the material presented here is copyrighted by The Brothers Chaps and/or Harmless Junk, Inc. For more information, see the legal stuff page on the official Homestar Runner website. The proprietor of this site asserts that publication of such material on the wiki qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.

Material on this site that is not copyrighted by The Brothers Chaps (e.g. opinions and mindless chatter) is licensed to the various authors, where indicated, and is released under a Creative Commons Deed, which simply ensures that none of this information may legally be used for commercial purposes.

Personal tools