Current revision |
Your text |
Line 58: |
Line 58: |
| [[File:goes4gold easter egg sb.PNG|thumb|Strong Bad with purple shading on his pants.]] | | [[File:goes4gold easter egg sb.PNG|thumb|Strong Bad with purple shading on his pants.]] |
| --{{User:Mml554/sig}} 14:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC) | | --{{User:Mml554/sig}} 14:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC) |
- | :I think other pages for toons that have an inconsistency in character design note them. I can't remember which those are, though. I'm not sure it should be noted in [[Strong Bad Evolution]] until it appears in other toons, but if it does it could be worth a sentence in the description of the current design. Probably not a full table row, though, assuming the grey shading is the only difference. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
- | ::The gray shading is not the only difference. If you look closely, Strong Bad's mouth is a slightly different shape; it looks a little more symmetrical than previously. As for the pants shading, I think a minor note in the seventh design might be helpful (much like how it's mentioned that a few toons and emails use the previous design for his mask). {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 23:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
| == Explaining the Sadness? == | | == Explaining the Sadness? == |
Line 66: |
Line 64: |
| :Portmanteaux used in toons are usually indicated in some way in the Fun Facts section, I think. Though I'm not sure we need to ''define'' "sad sack". Just indicating that the phrase exists and is part of the portmanteau should be fine. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 14:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC) | | :Portmanteaux used in toons are usually indicated in some way in the Fun Facts section, I think. Though I'm not sure we need to ''define'' "sad sack". Just indicating that the phrase exists and is part of the portmanteau should be fine. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 14:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC) |
| ::I agree. HRWiki is not a dictionary. I would also suggest that the facts be broken up, the part about who Pres. Taylor is remaining in real-worls refs, and the part about being a portmanteau being in inside refs. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC) | | ::I agree. HRWiki is not a dictionary. I would also suggest that the facts be broken up, the part about who Pres. Taylor is remaining in real-worls refs, and the part about being a portmanteau being in inside refs. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC) |
- | :::Considering that both aspects of the fact are different kinds of references, I'll support splitting the facts as well. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 15:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
- | ::::I agree with the above proposal(s), just for the record. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 16:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::I can say it was obvious to me that he was saying Sad Sack -[[Special:Contributions/166.137.90.120|166.137.90.120]] 20:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
- | ::::::I like the {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Homestar_Runner_Goes_For_the_Gold&diff=764771&oldid=764753&rcid=727613 splitting of facts}}. It makes sense to do so. Thanks DeFender1031! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 15:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::::For the record, I had never heard the term "sad sack" prior to this toon. The reference to Zachary Taylor was obvious to me, but the term "sad sack" was completely new to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | == The Sneak ==
| |
- |
| |
- | Is it worth mentioning the possibility that in the original story, "The Sneak" was intended to be the name of the yet-unnamed The Cheat, which the Bros. Chaps repurposed into the name of his old timey counterpart? ----[[User:Minermanb|Minermanb]]
| |