Talk:LLC,,.
From Homestar Runner Wiki
[edit] Necessary?
What the crap-make? What is this? WHY is this? Why did you even add this garglemesh? I don't understand! Or maybe I sort of do... but do we need this? --Jellote 19:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Alright, I understand why we have this now. The ,,. thing is original. Sorry. --Jellote 00:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it is a running gag, and there's three appearances. When there was just two, we could just say Totalsoft was a reference to Thoraxcorp, but with three, it's a running joke in its own right. --phlip TC 22:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --JJC,,. 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly valid. Keep — Defender1031*Talk 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nice article, could use more info but nice article. Keep--Record307 Talk/Contribs 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Definate keeper. It is a running gag and should be kept. 8:15 p.m. March 31, 2009
- Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --Jay (Talk) 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- I vote "Keep". There are now four LLC,,.s in the H*R universe. Dagoth 08:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The irregular punctuation makes it out of the ordinary and the three (now four) appearances of it makes it count as a running gags. Homestar-Winner (talk) 02:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- I vote "Keep". There are now four LLC,,.s in the H*R universe. Dagoth 08:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --Jay (Talk) 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Definate keeper. It is a running gag and should be kept. 8:15 p.m. March 31, 2009
- Nice article, could use more info but nice article. Keep--Record307 Talk/Contribs 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly valid. Keep — Defender1031*Talk 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --JJC,,. 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Explanation
I'm just wondering, since I don't know much about legalese - Is there any way to actually construct this type of punctuation? Or something similar? (only one comma, for example, or two dots and one comma) — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 05:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)