Talk:Innards

From Homestar Runner Wiki

This is unneeded. Delete Accel 03:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Would you like to say why you think it's not needed? BBG 03:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

There have been barely any mentions and this isn't really that subtle. Accel 03:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

I disagree. I made this page with the intention that is could be improved (before I registered). Don't shoot it down so fast. It was up for literally one minute.--Jellote 03:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

That's no reason to disagree. Accel 03:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

It only takes 3 times for a running gag. Also, I think it should be kept, albeit with a bit of cleanup, and perhaps a more descriptive name, perhaps Characters Being Eaten or along those lines. Strongkinghomsarsmith 03:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Exactly my point. This is my first time making a full page. Besides, i wasn't looged in. I couldn't add images. I need help from a better wikier (is that a word?) to make this page better than curlyfries. --Jellote 03:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I see DorianGray took care of the cleanup part... Strongkinghomsarsmith 03:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Wow, Another page saved by Dorian. I vote KEEP.--Jellote 03:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC) I also seem to never remember to add my signiure the first time.

Since when do we avoid writing about things that aren't subtle? BBG 03:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

True. So... does that mean we have to destroy Homsar or Strong Bad Email just because they're not subtle? And Crapfully Yours? By now, we mostly all agree to keep it. Well, I jest we should keep it. And Accel, please don't be so blunt, harsh and dominating when a new article you don't like appears. With all due respect, --Jellote 04:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC) .

[edit] Wow. That was fast. Locations?

In less than ten minutes this page is nearly perfect. Thank you all for your support. But on another note, what categories should this fall under? --Jellote 03:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rename

I say "Character's Insides". Accel 03:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, Cheerleader did call the lion one "inards", so I thought that would be a fitting name. I guess not. But for the life of me, I hope it is never call "stomaches" or "intestines". --Jellote 03:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

This is an afterthought: How about "Gaestrointesinal Regions"? [Thinks over terrible name] Or perhaps Character's Insides. Yep. I'll go with that. Your pal, --Jellote 04:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC).

Or, rather "Characters' Insides", if you want to be grammatically correct. --DorianGray 04:19, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Dorian "The Gron Sag" Gray. Didn't notice that. May I ask, "How does one actually change the tiles?" Do only Gnomes get to, or is it up to the maker of this wedsite? Can YOU? And more importantly, does anyone disagree with the new title, or should we stick with it? The guy to ask all the questions, --Jellote 04:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC) .

Well, we ought to wait a while. It's been, what, less than an hour? Give more time for people to chime in and give concensus. --DorianGray 04:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Once we form a consensus, everyone will be able to rename it by clicking the "move" button on the top of the screen. BBG 05:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

I find "Innards" an appropriate name. Using adding "Characters'" to the end of it and using a less-descriptive word doesn't seem to fit. But then again, using "Innards" in the headings doesn't seem to be that fitting either...Keep I have no idea. --75.5.176.233 15:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

As I said above, perhaps something like Characters Being Eaten, but Characters' Insides is good. Strongkinghomsarsmith 01:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, is anything wrong about "Innards", though. It is descriptive, easy to pronounce, short and sweet and, above all, it is the name given to the region by Cheerleader. And please, Accel, give an understandable arguement. That's twice in one page. If you want someone to change it, could you give a reason... No offense intended, --Jellote 22:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

As it seems there is no longer any argument, there cannot be a rename at this time. For now, the rename banner will be removed.