Current revision |
Your text |
Line 180: |
Line 180: |
| | | |
| Heyo! It seems that when removing templates, you appear to leave blank space. If you could, please make sure there are no spaces at the top of articles or talk pages. DeFendm'n has been removing these spaces behind you, so I think he would probably appreciate it if you delete the spaces. Thanks! - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 18:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC) | | Heyo! It seems that when removing templates, you appear to leave blank space. If you could, please make sure there are no spaces at the top of articles or talk pages. DeFendm'n has been removing these spaces behind you, so I think he would probably appreciate it if you delete the spaces. Thanks! - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 18:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
- |
| |
- | == Regarding Deleting Articles ==
| |
- |
| |
- | I've happened to notice you're quick on the draw to label "unnecessary" articles with the speedy delete template (and sometimes add the "Deleted Talk" template for talk pages). The correct process for main articles though is to use the "To Be Discussed" template (and "Talk To Be Discussed" for talk pages). Even if it's a slow process due to lack of overall wiki activity, it's supposed to give people time to talk and discuss an article's quality and only when most people agree that an article can't be saved, then an admin or a user with mod privileges can delete the article and slap "Deleted Talk" on the talk page.
| |
- |
| |
- | Remember <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> for articles and <nowiki>{{ttbd}}</nowiki> for article talk pages that should have a discussion about article quality. I hope this helps. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 16:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | : Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | ::<s>Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)</s>
| |
- | ::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
| |
- | :::: I just looked, never put it up for deletion. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
| |
- | ::::: I know Catjaz striked this out, but unlike other H*R Wiki projects like the former Featured Articles project that went by a time limit and thus was fine with minimal consensus, article deletions don't have a time limit. Sure for matters where articles are voted to be moved to a new name or merged into similar articles, users can handle that themselves by redirecting/merging + deleted talk after a sufficient period of time, but there is no hurry to nuke an article voted to be deleted outright (unless it's obvious spam/vandalism).
| |
- |
| |
- | ::::: You can leave the To Be Discussed templates up and an admin will deal with discussed articles when one of them feels like doing some work in the Articles for Discussion category. Sure wiki activity will be slow, discussions might be slow to happen if at all, but it's fair to give at least some time for discussions to take place. Bronco, you do good work here, but I figured I could offer advice on the process of Articles of Discussion (and to help make the admins' jobs easier in logging what happened with each discussed article). — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 14:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | :::::: You're right in that I was in a bit of a rush to clear out TBD, but I also got all of my changes vetted. Anyway, I do appreciate the advice.{{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 15:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
| |