Talk:Tentacle Skull

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (and i forgot to add the section)
(moige it!)
Line 9: Line 9:
:::::::Well, I have a couple reasons to merge it: 1. usually, a thing doesn't get its own article unless it's appeared three times, but this guy hasn't. 2. A lot of more significant things don't have their own pages. 3. This guy fits neatly in with skulls.-[[User:LordQuackingstick|LordQuackingstick]] 18:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
:::::::Well, I have a couple reasons to merge it: 1. usually, a thing doesn't get its own article unless it's appeared three times, but this guy hasn't. 2. A lot of more significant things don't have their own pages. 3. This guy fits neatly in with skulls.-[[User:LordQuackingstick|LordQuackingstick]] 18:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
::::::::The most valid reason for keeping is that this is considered a Character, while Skulls is a list of appearences of skulls. - {{User:Ilko Skevüld's Teh C/Sig}} 18:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
::::::::The most valid reason for keeping is that this is considered a Character, while Skulls is a list of appearences of skulls. - {{User:Ilko Skevüld's Teh C/Sig}} 18:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::::::::But he's a really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really minor character. I still say MERGE!

Revision as of 18:12, 6 January 2007

Merge

Shouldn't this be part of the Skulls page?-LordQuackingstick 13:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it should. Do you want to go put it there and see if a sysop can delete this page for you? -Brightstar Shiner 13:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if all the information on this page needs to be there as well, if he's listed as a Character, then he probably deserves his own page, and in that case not all the information here needs to be on the Skulls page as well. - ISTC 15:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Maybe it can be in both places, but the Skulls page can just have a short description and a link here. -Brightstar Shiner 15:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure this guy deserves his own page to begin with.-LordQuackingstick 16:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
He is (and always has been) on the Skulls page, and there may be a valid discussion about making a merge, but I'm not sold that it's a cut and dry case. So lets put a merge teplate on this and see what others think. - ISTC 17:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this page needs to be merged. Keep it. I don't really have a valid reason, 'cept that it "just feels right". (Well, that was lame...)kai lyn 18:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, I have a couple reasons to merge it: 1. usually, a thing doesn't get its own article unless it's appeared three times, but this guy hasn't. 2. A lot of more significant things don't have their own pages. 3. This guy fits neatly in with skulls.-LordQuackingstick 18:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
The most valid reason for keeping is that this is considered a Character, while Skulls is a list of appearences of skulls. - ISTC 18:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
But he's a really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really minor character. I still say MERGE!
Personal tools