Talk:Strong Bad and Senor Cardgage's Relationship
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Delete: keepit) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Delete: change vote to keep.) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:: By "main characters" we mean the ones with character videros. Videos. But seriously, this page seems worthwhile.--[[User:Jellote|Jellote wuz here]] 21:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | :: By "main characters" we mean the ones with character videros. Videos. But seriously, this page seems worthwhile.--[[User:Jellote|Jellote wuz here]] 21:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:This page is interesting enough to '''keep'''. I think this is a good example of a non-main-character relationship page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | :This page is interesting enough to '''keep'''. I think this is a good example of a non-main-character relationship page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Now that there is content, i can safely switch my opinion to '''keep''' and regret the misunderstanding that led to me tagging this article in the first place. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 24 July 2009
Delete
Once again, main characters only. delete. — Defender1031*Talk 23:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree completely. DELETE-Espemon333
- Once again, main characters only is absolutely not a rule. I would be somewhat interested to see how this one would shape up, but my immediate thought is that it would likely be a bit too one-sided, with the only content suggesting SB's admiration for SC. That would be a problem. Heimstern Läufer
00:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, SB's creeped out at SC in sbemail201. EDIT: If this turns into a legitimate article, then I have no problem with it. But, it's died. free 00:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have just been informed that there is no such rule. In which case, i'm switching to neutral given the total lack of content. I'd have to see where this goes before forming an opinion. — Defender1031*Talk 00:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know if there's enough for a whole article, but we should at least consider it. Strong Bad has a complete fascination with Senor Cardgage, something not seen with any of the other characters. (As an aside, SC is as close to a main character as you can get without officially being given the designation.) — It's dot com 01:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, if any non-main-character relationship page deserves to be made, it's this one. And I've long considered Cardgage the unofficial thirteenth main character. At the time I checked (admittedly a while ago, but I doubt it's changed much if at all since then), he had more appearances than any other non-main character other than the Teen Girl Squad, and unlike the TGS, lives in Free Country USA... if he had a character video and started appearing in Halloween toons, he'd be set. Anyway, as for this page, I have only the one concern Heimi had: it may be a bit too one-sided. Neutral for now. --Jay (Talk) 01:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- This page is actually one of the pages I wish I could allow myself to make. I bet if there was a poll of which character shuld be the newest main character, Cardgage would win in a landslide. I find him funnier than his counterpart Homsar. If there was a rule about main characters only, we could probably exempt it here. That being said, there is no such rule. Besides, let's compare this to several other relationship pages that are painflly shorter, stubbier and less informative than this page. Definite keep! Definitely. Oh, and if your wondering why I overused "definitely" right there, it was one of my failed pages.--Jellote wuz here 19:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well in my opinion he could be a main character. in fact if you go to the hrwiki premade userboxes you can see he has his own "this users favourite character is..." along with other main characters such as strong bad, bubs, marzipan, etc.--safariventureman 20:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, if any non-main-character relationship page deserves to be made, it's this one. And I've long considered Cardgage the unofficial thirteenth main character. At the time I checked (admittedly a while ago, but I doubt it's changed much if at all since then), he had more appearances than any other non-main character other than the Teen Girl Squad, and unlike the TGS, lives in Free Country USA... if he had a character video and started appearing in Halloween toons, he'd be set. Anyway, as for this page, I have only the one concern Heimi had: it may be a bit too one-sided. Neutral for now. --Jay (Talk) 01:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know if there's enough for a whole article, but we should at least consider it. Strong Bad has a complete fascination with Senor Cardgage, something not seen with any of the other characters. (As an aside, SC is as close to a main character as you can get without officially being given the designation.) — It's dot com 01:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have just been informed that there is no such rule. In which case, i'm switching to neutral given the total lack of content. I'd have to see where this goes before forming an opinion. — Defender1031*Talk 00:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, SB's creeped out at SC in sbemail201. EDIT: If this turns into a legitimate article, then I have no problem with it. But, it's died. free 00:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- By "main characters" we mean the ones with character videros. Videos. But seriously, this page seems worthwhile.--Jellote wuz here 21:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Once again, main characters only is absolutely not a rule. I would be somewhat interested to see how this one would shape up, but my immediate thought is that it would likely be a bit too one-sided, with the only content suggesting SB's admiration for SC. That would be a problem. Heimstern Läufer
- This page is interesting enough to keep. I think this is a good example of a non-main-character relationship page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 20:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Now that there is content, i can safely switch my opinion to keep and regret the misunderstanding that led to me tagging this article in the first place. — Defender1031*Talk 20:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
