Talk:Nonexistent Strong Bad Emails

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Caption)
(The Caption)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
Should we go with [http://hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Nonexistent_Strong_Bad_Emails&oldid=635219 the more relevant one] or [http://hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Nonexistent_Strong_Bad_Emails&oldid=635264 the funnier one]?  And if we choose the funnier one, how could we work in the quote from the relevant caption into the article? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 19:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Should we go with [http://hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Nonexistent_Strong_Bad_Emails&oldid=635219 the more relevant one] or [http://hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Nonexistent_Strong_Bad_Emails&oldid=635264 the funnier one]?  And if we choose the funnier one, how could we work in the quote from the relevant caption into the article? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 19:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
:I like the moon one. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.172|132.183.140.172]] 19:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Current revision as of 19:47, 11 March 2009

[edit] Needed?

There haven't been enough references to make this a good page, and the references on the page aren't even relevant. Delete. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 23:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean by both references being "relevant". Both of the examples given fit the page's description, and there is at least a third that I'm aware of (and personal favorites can be greatly expanded.) I think it's deserving of a clean-up, a merge if not a keep, and certainly not a delete. --Jay (Talk) 23:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I think this is a rather interesting concept. Strong Bad *has* mentioned, and even shown flashbacks to, numerous "e-mails" that don't actually exist. It needs a cleanup, but I see no reason why this page should be deleted... Keep. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 00:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Certainly a valid article. Keep. — Defender1031*Talk 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreeing with YK. Keep it. —Guard Duck talk 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Also with YK.. Keep.-Record307 Talk/Contribs 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreeing with the agreeing with YK. Keep. -132.183.151.26 01:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] The Caption

Should we go with the more relevant one or the funnier one? And if we choose the funnier one, how could we work in the quote from the relevant caption into the article? BBG 19:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

I like the moon one. -132.183.140.172 19:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)