Editing Talk:Let us give TANKS!
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
This page is 30 kilobytes long.
Current revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | |||
==Capitalization in title== | ==Capitalization in title== | ||
The page title is "Let Us Give TANKS!" but the Toons menu on H*R says "Let us give TANKS!" Is this for consistency, or should it be moved? - [[User:Dr. Clash|Dr. Clash]] | The page title is "Let Us Give TANKS!" but the Toons menu on H*R says "Let us give TANKS!" Is this for consistency, or should it be moved? - [[User:Dr. Clash|Dr. Clash]] | ||
Line 65: | Line 64: | ||
::I've already done that. The two versions are different. A more useful comparison is of the decompiled Flash files, which I've also already done. See above. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ::I've already done that. The two versions are different. A more useful comparison is of the decompiled Flash files, which I've also already done. See above. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
It's clear to me that this goof was fixed, but not well, and will still appear in certain situations. Anyone for changing the header to "Half-Fixed Goofs"? [[User:DeFender1031|DeFender1031]] 19:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | It's clear to me that this goof was fixed, but not well, and will still appear in certain situations. Anyone for changing the header to "Half-Fixed Goofs"? [[User:DeFender1031|DeFender1031]] 19:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
- | :::I just watched it on the official site. Even without using a seekbar, which I did shortly after, I could see his arm lower and the lime float. I have cleared my cache numerous times since the toon was released, so I'm with Loafing on this. | + | :::I just watched it on the official site. Even without using a seekbar, which I did shortly after, I could see his arm lower and the lime float. I have cleared my cache numerous times since the toon was released, so I'm with Loafing on this. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
== X-Men reference == | == X-Men reference == | ||
Line 142: | Line 137: | ||
:Do you mean Fightgar? I always thought he was saying "Say it right right right", and that he'd mispronounced ambrosia salad in some way. {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 03:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | :Do you mean Fightgar? I always thought he was saying "Say it right right right", and that he'd mispronounced ambrosia salad in some way. {{User:Shwoo/sig}} 03:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Oops, you're right. FIX'D! {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 05:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | ::Oops, you're right. FIX'D! {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 05:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
- | ::Fightgar is thankful for saying right right right right right. I can think of one time he said that. [[Shopping | + | ::Fightgar is thankful for saying right right right right right. I can think of one time he said that. [[Shopping For Danger]]: after Gunhaver says, "you better break yourself!" —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 03:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
:::I just watched Shopping For Danger, and I didn't hear him say it at all. I just heard him laughing after Gunhaver said that line. | :::I just watched Shopping For Danger, and I didn't hear him say it at all. I just heard him laughing after Gunhaver said that line. | ||
:::I kinda hear it. It does sound like him saying "right, right, right, right, right..." Still, I don't think that is the only reference. {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 05:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | :::I kinda hear it. It does sound like him saying "right, right, right, right, right..." Still, I don't think that is the only reference. {{User:NFITC1/sig}} 05:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 233: | Line 228: | ||
The first time the second part of this fun fact came about, I too immediately got rid of it. (See [[User talk:4kai2lyn6#Aw wight...|here]] for annoying-type ramblings by yours truly). But upon further contemplatin, it seems purty reasonable to me. Any takers? (I could live without it, but I figured it deserved a chance for debate). {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 04:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC) <small>(so tired)</small> | The first time the second part of this fun fact came about, I too immediately got rid of it. (See [[User talk:4kai2lyn6#Aw wight...|here]] for annoying-type ramblings by yours truly). But upon further contemplatin, it seems purty reasonable to me. Any takers? (I could live without it, but I figured it deserved a chance for debate). {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 04:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC) <small>(so tired)</small> | ||
:Nice try, but it really seems like a stretch to me. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | :Nice try, but it really seems like a stretch to me. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- |