Current revision |
Your text |
Line 53: |
Line 53: |
| | | |
| :She is the daughter of The Brothers Chaps' sister and brother-in-law. I don't know if it has already been resolved or figured out, but I wish to note this. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 15:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC) | | :She is the daughter of The Brothers Chaps' sister and brother-in-law. I don't know if it has already been resolved or figured out, but I wish to note this. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 15:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC) |
- |
| |
- | uuuh... there is an article in the Wiki about this... [[User:70.44.146.95|70.44.146.95]] 03:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
| |
- | :Please note that this conversation is several years old. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 03:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
| == Research == | | == Research == |
Line 159: |
Line 156: |
| :::::::Yeah, Tom's apostles don't like what I have to say. But they have it coming because they know I'm right. {{User:Darth Katana X/sig}} | | :::::::Yeah, Tom's apostles don't like what I have to say. But they have it coming because they know I'm right. {{User:Darth Katana X/sig}} |
| ::::::::Please, Granola. I'ma repeat this one more time: '''Darth Katana X was blocked for more than just this'''. So please, just stop talking in this discussion. Now. It's over, we've said all we've needed to say. You're just repeating yourself. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 00:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | | ::::::::Please, Granola. I'ma repeat this one more time: '''Darth Katana X was blocked for more than just this'''. So please, just stop talking in this discussion. Now. It's over, we've said all we've needed to say. You're just repeating yourself. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 00:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |
- | :::::::::Man, you're starting to make me laugh because of your arrogance. Please, stop before I spit my water out. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 00:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | + | :::::::::Jesus Christ....man, you're starting to make me laugh because of your arrogance. Please, stop before I spit my water out. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 00:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |
| ::::::::::Sorry, I just hate seeing draconian-ally (not a word, but oh well) long blocks for such minor things. Even worse was when you were blocked for a week for something that was Ciberdude's fault. I could go on and on, but I won't.. {{User:Granola/sig}} 00:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | | ::::::::::Sorry, I just hate seeing draconian-ally (not a word, but oh well) long blocks for such minor things. Even worse was when you were blocked for a week for something that was Ciberdude's fault. I could go on and on, but I won't.. {{User:Granola/sig}} 00:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |
| :::::::::::I agree that Darth's comments here have gotten increasingly arrogant. But notice how that was ''after'' he had already been unfairly blocked etc. {{User:Granola/sig}} 00:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | | :::::::::::I agree that Darth's comments here have gotten increasingly arrogant. But notice how that was ''after'' he had already been unfairly blocked etc. {{User:Granola/sig}} 00:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |
| ::::::::::::How sad. I have seen political elections with more respect for each other. "Tom's apostles"? "They know I am right"? Your logic is quite impressive. Darth Katana X, this is your final warning. If you insult the admins, or any other user for that matter, you will be banned again. Now, I doubt that some of you remember what this entire section is about. I am fine with the transcript here, but I wouldn't mind seeing the link go. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 00:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | | ::::::::::::How sad. I have seen political elections with more respect for each other. "Tom's apostles"? "They know I am right"? Your logic is quite impressive. Darth Katana X, this is your final warning. If you insult the admins, or any other user for that matter, you will be banned again. Now, I doubt that some of you remember what this entire section is about. I am fine with the transcript here, but I wouldn't mind seeing the link go. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 00:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |
- |
| |
- | :::::::::::::I find it deliciously ironic and hypocritical that I was banned for pointing out that this is something the Brothers Chaps more than likely didn't want anyone to see ''and'' that on top of that a certain happening makes it even worse. The reason? For bringing up a sensitive issue! A ha! You're the ones bringing it up! Just had to get that off my chest. {{User:Darth Katana X/sig}} 10:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | ::::::::::::::That wasn't why you were banned. If TBC wanted us to take this down, all they would have to do is ask, and they know it. However, the author (Karen Wagner) has actually taken credit for writing it and has provided us with background information. That hardly seems like something that they'd do if they wanted it gone. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | == Visuals Article for If I Ran the Camera? ==
| |
- |
| |
- | Sorry for disturbing your nine-year slumber, forum, but I think ''this'' article needs a sub-article with it. We've described a recent cartoon, [[Record Store Day Visuals|Record Store Day]], so it kind of makes me wonder why we never added a see-for-yourself aid to If I Ran the Camera. If someone is already working on that, I'd like to thank them in advance.
| |
- |
| |
- | Sorry that we didn't go for ten years,<br>
| |
- | '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64|71.122.225.64]] 8:57 PM EST, March 11th, 2016
| |
- | :That's a good idea. We should do that. (By the way, you should creat <s>[[montage|a montage]]</s> an account. Then you can have a userpage and a signature and stuff.) {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 03:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
- | ::But one, this is a side project; two, it can easily go in the transcript. And on a side note, you misused "forum". {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 06:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
- | :::I still think it should be a separate article. Why not even try it? '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64|71.122.225.64]] 8:17 AM EST, March 11th, 2016
| |
- | ::::It should not. They are still frame images and a separate visuals article is only done for music videos. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::Looking back at [[Record Store Day]], I suddenly agree with you. Despite the album covers all being still images, they still have noticeable transitions added to them. I've changed my mind to it being a part of the transcript. Let's see what the peoples can do, and if I want, I'll come back to edit some things I think are necessary.<br>
| |
- | :::::'''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64|71.122.225.64]] 6:43 PM EST, March 11th, 2016
| |
- | ::::::DeFender: On the subject of whether the visuals should be transcribed at all, I think the only precedents we have in this format are the original books and the Museum pages, and even then, those aren't poems. Personally I don't see any harm in transcribing the visuals (and it's a must if we are going for completeness), but it hasn't really been done before. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 23:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::::It's been a while. Why haven't we gotten to adding to the article? Did we need to attend others' services? We need to do this sooner or later.<br>'''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64|71.122.225.64]] 5:52 PM EST, March 31st, 2016
| |
- | ::::::::Again, we don't do visuals articles for stuff like this. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::::::I'm not wanting a separate article for the visuals anymore. We could just interpret it with the article itself. There ARE visuals after all. How else can we describe them? We can't say they're not there.<br>'''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64|71.122.225.64]] 6:12 AM EST, March 31st, 2016
| |