Editing Talk:Dragons

== Scope ==
This should include all dragons including trogdor their appearances so on [[User:Physicsguymonsterman|Physicsguymonsterman]]
:Next time you can't extend an article yourself, don't forget to add <nowiki>{{stub}}</nowiki> at the end so more people will notice its brevity. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 20:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
::Include all dragons on the site. Atari dragon trogador Mentions like in guitar " and the dragon comes in the niiiiiight" needs to be added.  They are a common theme ps Go Wormlinger [[User:Physicsguymonsterman|Physicsguymonsterman]] 23:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I think this article should be expanded to include all dragons, not just the ones from [[dragon]]. I'm going to start expanding the sections now. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
:Don't forget [[Trogador]]. [[User:EASports|EASports]] 17:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

== Survey Patrol Edit ==
According to one of the guidelines when reverting edits as patrolled edits, one of them says that you have to survey the edit to make sure it isn't spam/vandalism. So I'm going to ask you this: Are you sure that your last edit isn't spam-related? -{{User:Umlaut76/sig}} 20:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
:Huh? I don't understand your question. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
::Okay, you didn't got the whole statement. I am going to ask the same question again just to make it consent: Are you aware that your last edit does not involve spam/vandalism? -{{User:Umlaut76/sig}} P.S.: If you find it consent, then allow me to patrol your edit.
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 According to one of the guidelines when reverting edits as patrolled edits, one of them says that you have to survey the edit to make sure it isn't spam/vandalism. So I'm going to ask you this: Are you sure that your last edit isn't spam-related? -{{User:Umlaut76/sig}} 20:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 :Huh? I don't understand your question. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
-::Okay, you didn't get the whole statement. I am going to ask the same question again just to make it consent: Are you aware that your last edit does not involve spam/vandalism? -{{User:Umlaut76/sig}} P.S.: If you find it consent, then allow me to patrol your edit.
+::Okay, you didn't got the whole statement. I am going to ask the same question again just to make it consent: Are you aware that your last edit does not involve spam/vandalism? -{{User:Umlaut76/sig}} P.S.: If you find it consent, then allow me to patrol your edit.
-:::Yes. I'm aware that none of my edits involve those things. They're not supposed to. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
-::::That's fine. I'm making absolutely sure that none of your edits involve spam. -{{User:Umlaut76/sig}}
-:::::I hope we're not gonna have this conversation every time you try to patrol something. "Survey the edit" means to look it over and make sure it's not vandalism. Not to ask the person who did the edit whether they're aware it's not vandalism. --[[User:Belthazar|Belthazar]] 02:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
-::::::OMG, so sorry about the "survey", I thought they were referring to surveying users. -{{User:Umlaut76/sig}} P.S.: I hope this conversation doesn't continue within 2 weeks.