Editing Talk:Date Nite

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
Current revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{featuredarticle}}
 
{{talk|11290}}
{{talk|11290}}
-
== What about a SECRET Hot Date ==
+
== Secret Hot Date ==
Is there a connection between the "secret hot date" Cardboard Marzipan invited the Cheat on and the "hot date" they actually went on?  Is the fact that there are fireworks in both of the cartoons relevant? {{unsigned|75.85.125.208|22:58, 23 April 2007}}
Is there a connection between the "secret hot date" Cardboard Marzipan invited the Cheat on and the "hot date" they actually went on?  Is the fact that there are fireworks in both of the cartoons relevant? {{unsigned|75.85.125.208|22:58, 23 April 2007}}
Line 32: Line 31:
Heh, that is totally something BM would say. [[User:The makuta|The makuta]] 13:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Heh, that is totally something BM would say. [[User:The makuta|The makuta]] 13:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
-
 
-
Sounds like a combonation of BM and Bob from Bob and George. But mostly BM. [[User:The Magic Pixel|The Magic Pixel]] 15:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
== Mario ==
== Mario ==
Line 55: Line 52:
:(129.64.141.43, I replied [[User talk:129.64.141.43|here]]) This one's a tough call, but I'm leaning toward it being a reference to Mario here. The discussion is so evenly split, I think that [[HRWiki:STUFF|STUFF]] would be helpful here — I'll get one started. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
:(129.64.141.43, I replied [[User talk:129.64.141.43|here]]) This one's a tough call, but I'm leaning toward it being a reference to Mario here. The discussion is so evenly split, I think that [[HRWiki:STUFF|STUFF]] would be helpful here — I'll get one started. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
::Okay, [[#Thank you, chef! But our reference is in another castle.|here it is]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
+
::Okay, [[STUFF:Date Nite#Thank you, chef! But our reference is in another castle.|here it is]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I also thought of Mario right away, but that doesn't mean that that's what TBC were thinking of when they wrote the cartoon. --[[User:Lux Acerbus|Lux Acerbus]] 01:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I also thought of Mario right away, but that doesn't mean that that's what TBC were thinking of when they wrote the cartoon. --[[User:Lux Acerbus|Lux Acerbus]] 01:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Line 68: Line 65:
:::::Oh my. That would be quite the interesting development...--[[User:Kiwi|Kiwi]] 22:04, 24 Apr 2007 (UTC)
:::::Oh my. That would be quite the interesting development...--[[User:Kiwi|Kiwi]] 22:04, 24 Apr 2007 (UTC)
::::Believe it or not, there are some men who wear curlers (I'm involved in the dance world :P). Though I agree it's more than likely a joke that he's playing a mom. Nothin' serious. Coach Z has always been weird. [[User:Coveredinharmony|CoveredinSuudzu]] 15:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
::::Believe it or not, there are some men who wear curlers (I'm involved in the dance world :P). Though I agree it's more than likely a joke that he's playing a mom. Nothin' serious. Coach Z has always been weird. [[User:Coveredinharmony|CoveredinSuudzu]] 15:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
:::::We have, after all, established that he has more than two problems. —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 03:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::I agree that Coach Z is acting like a wife, but it's not implying that he and Bubz are gay. I think it was more of a joke to get the viewers to really crack up. ~[[User:HideAndSeek|HideAndSeek]]
 
-
:::::::HideAndSeek hit the nail on the head. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 17:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
[[Image:Lockhorn Comic.PNG|thumb|Another rolling pin-wielding housewife]]
 
-
:Just as a note, this isn't the first time that a rolling pin has been used as a prop for a stereotypical housewife (see right). {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
== Going down with the ship ==
== Going down with the ship ==
Line 87: Line 79:
:I fail to see how this is cartoony. It's a common motif, not a reference to anything in particular.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
:I fail to see how this is cartoony. It's a common motif, not a reference to anything in particular.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
:It could be a reference to most cartoons, which sing/plays [[Wikipedia:Taps|Taps]] as their ship sinks. - {{User:Zerlock1124/sig}}
:It could be a reference to most cartoons, which sing/plays [[Wikipedia:Taps|Taps]] as their ship sinks. - {{User:Zerlock1124/sig}}
-
Mind, I don't think it should be in the article, but for the record, I thought the same thing. "Hm, Red October reference, singing a national anthem..." —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 03:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
Who put the whole Titanic thing in there? I see no similarity. I believe it's already mentioned in the article that sailors often sing their national anthem as they go down with their ship, the Titanic wasn't a military vessel, there are no panicking passengers for Homestar and Strong Bad to soothe with their music (as the musicians on the Titanic were trying to do by continuing to play), and neither of them is using an instrument, nor were the musicians on the Titanic singing. Barely any similarity. I think this needs to be removed. --[[User:Lux Acerbus|Lux Acerbus]] 04:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Just for the record, I agree (and I see that it's now been {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Date_Nite&curid=34045&diff=450885&oldid=450878 removed}}). {{User:Trey56/sig}} 04:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 
== Rockets ==
== Rockets ==
Line 106: Line 94:
::::I'd say the fact doesn't belong. There is no official schedule that I'm aware of for fund raising on public radio, so each week could be a fundraising week for some station. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
::::I'd say the fact doesn't belong. There is no official schedule that I'm aware of for fund raising on public radio, so each week could be a fundraising week for some station. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
:::::Don't read it, watch it! {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 04:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
:::::Don't read it, watch it! {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 04:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
::::::Huh? What am I not supposed to read and supposed to watch? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::That was a reply to Jangles' "I didn't read the easter egg."{{User:Loafing/sig}} 02:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
== FUN Facts.  FUN ==
== FUN Facts.  FUN ==
Line 120: Line 106:
== Differnet ==
== Differnet ==
-
Is it just me, or did this toon seem... I dunno... different than the older ones somehow? Did TBC use a different engine to make it or something?--[[User:68.53.87.6|68.53.87.6]]
+
Is it just me, or did this toon seem... I dunno... different than the older ones somehow? Did TBC use a different engine to make it or something?--[[User:Homsar Lover|Homsar Lover]]
:Looks like Flash to me. Maybe they upgraded the program or something. [[User:Wrath|Wrath]]
:Looks like Flash to me. Maybe they upgraded the program or something. [[User:Wrath|Wrath]]
:Maybe you're not used to the style used (as in it's night, romance, fancy resteraunts, etc.).-{{User:Zerlock1124/sig}}
:Maybe you're not used to the style used (as in it's night, romance, fancy resteraunts, etc.).-{{User:Zerlock1124/sig}}
-
Yer probably right Zerlock. After all, most toons are in the day.--[[User:68.53.87.6|68.53.87.6]]
 
== Marzipan's house ==
== Marzipan's house ==
Line 134: Line 119:
:::So, [[Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon]] was what, three years ago? They sure do seem to live together now, though. [[User:76.99.53.18|76.99.53.18]] 22:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC) (Same guy, different IP address.)
:::So, [[Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon]] was what, three years ago? They sure do seem to live together now, though. [[User:76.99.53.18|76.99.53.18]] 22:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC) (Same guy, different IP address.)
::::That commentary was recorded last summer. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
::::That commentary was recorded last summer. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
FYI: Homestar has his own house. Weren't you looking hard enough? Jeez! - '''Unknown'''
 
== Strong Bad, Nice? ==
== Strong Bad, Nice? ==
Line 153: Line 137:
::What Loafing said.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 22:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
::What Loafing said.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 22:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
:::This thread is veering out of talk page appropriateness but let me state that in no way would I buy for a second that TBC are ever going to present their characters in any relationship other than goofy, dysfunctional ones. Not that we need to "worry" about a gay relationship in the first place, but it's as close to a certainty as anything is in this world that TBC are not intending their characters to be gay. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:::This thread is veering out of talk page appropriateness but let me state that in no way would I buy for a second that TBC are ever going to present their characters in any relationship other than goofy, dysfunctional ones. Not that we need to "worry" about a gay relationship in the first place, but it's as close to a certainty as anything is in this world that TBC are not intending their characters to be gay. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
-
:it might be worrisome that TBC might be introducing gay themes to HR.com.  Isn't that the entire point of HeyMama's post?  I might be able to ignore your politically correct notions that homosexuality is normal if you didn't feel the need to lecture people about it and then complain that the discussion is inappropriate.  If you truly thought it was inappropriate you wouldn't engage in it yourselves, but merely say "this is inappropriate."  But that urge to add your viewpoint on homosexuality to the thread is just too strong to pass up, isn't it?  My guess is that TBC leave gay themes out of HR.com because it ''isn't'' normal and it offends a lot of people. [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 07:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
+
 
-
::This is inappropriate. You have now ''both'' given in to the urge to state your personal viewpoints. This thread is not material to the content of the article, so, per our talk page policy, please stop using it for discussion. You or anyone else is certainly welcome to continue this subject, so long as it's not here. As it has been repeatedly suggested, our forum is one such venue where you can go to talk about it if you so desire. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 08:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
+
== Good. ==
 +
 
 +
'Bout time Marzipan got out with someone else. {{User:Drippingyellowmadness/sig}} 21:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
*This is another of those forummy comments. ;) --{{User:NevaDie/sig}} 21:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
== Strong Sad's voice ==
== Strong Sad's voice ==
Line 168: Line 155:
::Speaking of title cards, should someone add that at the end of the title sequence, the 'e' falls against the title frame?[[User:Sir Vimes|Sir Vimes]] 23:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
::Speaking of title cards, should someone add that at the end of the title sequence, the 'e' falls against the title frame?[[User:Sir Vimes|Sir Vimes]] 23:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
:::Every Big Toon, even from 2005-now, has a title card.  (although for [[Strongest Man in the World]] they simply reused the cover of [[The Homestar Runner Enters The Strongest Man in the World Contest]], which the toon is based on)  Also, every major Halloween toon, the [[Puppet Stuff]], and every [[Decemberween]] special except the email [[what i want]] have title cards. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 00:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
:::Every Big Toon, even from 2005-now, has a title card.  (although for [[Strongest Man in the World]] they simply reused the cover of [[The Homestar Runner Enters The Strongest Man in the World Contest]], which the toon is based on)  Also, every major Halloween toon, the [[Puppet Stuff]], and every [[Decemberween]] special except the email [[what i want]] have title cards. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 00:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
:::Isn't the tilted 'e' a reference to a sign for a famous club or bar or restaurant or something (or maybe it was a painting)?  I swear I've seen something similar to it before.  Does anyone know what I'm taking about? [[User:Nynexman4464|Nynexman4464]] 05:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::Dell? Enron? Sorry my mind reading abilities are on the fritz.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 06:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::No, it wasn't like a company (I don't think).  I think the format of the sign was similar, two words on top of one another, the last one or two letters being the same in both words, so they used a large letter for both.  I can picture it, but I can't name it for the life of me.  I dunno, maybe divine inspiration will hit me at some point to remember it.[[User:Nynexman4464|Nynexman4464]] 20:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
== Strong Bad Old-timey Strong Bad Reference ==
== Strong Bad Old-timey Strong Bad Reference ==
Line 203: Line 187:
Woah. This is the first time I've seen real character development, done by characters, with actual development, since, like...ever. Does anyone else notice that? And feel unnverved? [[User:VolatileChemical|VolatileChemical]] 15:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Woah. This is the first time I've seen real character development, done by characters, with actual development, since, like...ever. Does anyone else notice that? And feel unnverved? [[User:VolatileChemical|VolatileChemical]] 15:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
:This is probably the most salient example, but I think it would be difficult to hold that it is the first time.  There are snippets of character development here and there, if we allow that the entire world of www.homestarrunner.com is one holistic narrative.  For example, we know that the relationship between Strong Sad and Strong Bad wasn't always as it is now ([[Strong Sad's Secret Styles|The Secrets That I Keep]]).  We also see a desperate attempt by the KOT to become a cool character (seeking help from Marzipan on her answering machine and creating KOTVOQPCS, which by it's name implies that the KOT is "popular").  Numerous characters have had epiphanies of self-awareness (SS "I'm a waste of space", CZ "I've hit rack bartom!").  And throughout the entire narrative we see fluctuating relational dynamics between all of the characters; their attitudes and behavior towards one another does not remain static (at times SB hates HR, and at other times they are found playing Cheat Commandos or drinking 'old ones together).  Because HR.com is episodic in nature it is difficult to see much character development in any given instance, but as a broader story arc it should be easier to see development. [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 02:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
+
:This is probably the most salient example, but I think it would be difficult to hold that it is the first time.  There are snippets of character development here and there, if we allow that the entire world of www.homestarrunner.com is one holistic narrative.  For example, we know that the relationship between Strong Sad and Strong Bad wasn't always as it is now ([[The Secrets That I Keep]]).  We also see a desperate attempt by the KOT to become a cool character (seeking help from Marzipan on her answering machine and creating KOTVOQPCS, which by it's name implies that the KOT is "popular").  Numerous characters have had epiphanies of self-awareness (SS "I'm a waste of space", CZ "I've hit rack bartom!").  And throughout the entire narrative we see fluctuating relational dynamics between all of the characters; their attitudes and behavior towards one another does not remain static (at times SB hates HR, and at other times they are found playing Cheat Commandos or drinking 'old ones together).  Because HR.com is episodic in nature it is difficult to see much character development in any given instance, but as a broader story arc it should be easier to see development. [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 02:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
-
::Don't forget Strong Sad's development in Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon. That was a big one. - {{User:Joshua/sig}}
+
== Jail reference? ==
== Jail reference? ==
Doesn't the use of fireworks used as TNT count as a reference to the [[Strong Bad is in Jail]] 'toon? -{{User:Zerlock1124/sig}}
Doesn't the use of fireworks used as TNT count as a reference to the [[Strong Bad is in Jail]] 'toon? -{{User:Zerlock1124/sig}}
:Yep. Already mentioned. Same brand of rockets and everything. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
:Yep. Already mentioned. Same brand of rockets and everything. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
:: To be technical, they were used as rockets here, not TNT. [[User:PureQuestion|PureQuestion]] 22:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 
== BIAS ==
== BIAS ==
Line 224: Line 206:
::::Good point.  I am still puzzled why tech specs would be found in the user label portion of the tape, but the fact that the geddup noise radio station is a ribald morning show and ''not'' public radio demands the conclusion you have reached. [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 02:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
::::Good point.  I am still puzzled why tech specs would be found in the user label portion of the tape, but the fact that the geddup noise radio station is a ribald morning show and ''not'' public radio demands the conclusion you have reached. [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 02:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
-
:::::I think they simply didn't put as much thought as you into what they put on the tape to make it look like a tape. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::Also, bias is something that is applied to the tape when it is recorded, it's not inherent to the specific tape itself (though, different bias is better for different kinds of tape).  When I used to work with tapes extensively I would always note on the label what bias I used to record the tape (in fact, there was typically a checkbox devoted to it on the user label).{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 03:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::Incidentally, I'm the one who originally added the link to [[Wikipedia:Tape bias|tape bias]], which I put there for readers who might not know there was a double meaning to the word. But I've always thought that the pun was intended. That is, I think they used the technical term as a play on the political sense of the words. I figured linking to anything besides tape bias would be unnecessarily explaining the joke. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::I can't say I agree; Homestar Runner stuff rarely if ever ventures into sociopolitical commentary.  It goes against the idea of the body of work.  Also, considering there was nothing political in the broadcast, it seems like a severe stretch. -[[User:Unknownwarrior33|Unknownwarrior33]] 23:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
== Marzipan eats Marshmallows?! ==
== Marzipan eats Marshmallows?! ==
A primary ingredient in Marshmallows is gelatin, which made from boiled animal bones. I don't think Marzipan would like this very much (since she is a vegetarian). Thoughts? I modified the article to show this, but it was reverted and claimed to be "nit-picking."  Hardly. [[User:70.58.71.12|70.58.71.12]] 02:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
A primary ingredient in Marshmallows is gelatin, which made from boiled animal bones. I don't think Marzipan would like this very much (since she is a vegetarian). Thoughts? I modified the article to show this, but it was reverted and claimed to be "nit-picking."  Hardly. [[User:70.58.71.12|70.58.71.12]] 02:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
-
:Is Marzipan a vegetarian? Can you cite where it's disclosed? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::Well, it's mentioned without citation a couple times on this wiki... but the only thing close to an official statement that I see comes from [[All_Things_Considered_Interview_-_8_May_2005|a 2005 interview on NPR]], in which the interviewer refers to Marzipan as "Homestar's Vegetarian girlfriend" and his statement is not refuted by TBC.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 03:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
::It's pretty safe to assume that Marzipan is a vegetarian or vegan of some kind.  Her mascara, for instance.  The tofu BBQ, for another.  [[Homestar Jr.]], for a third.  You may not have a verbal confession from her, but all signs point to that assumption.  I would suggest that based on the evidence we have it is harder to prove that she ''isn't'' a vegetarian than that she ''is''. [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 03:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
:::However - Vegan Mascara might be a brand name. I like tofu almost as much as I like a steak. And reporters do get facts wrong sometimes, even NPR. I think it's just speculation to decide she's a vegan/strict vegetarian/weak vegetarian without explicit establishment. If the fact is included, it needs to be worded so as not to say she "is" a vegetarian, but that she might be; and also without weaseling the fact to the point of it no longer being notable. A challenge. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::All you need to prove that she isn't a vegetarian is an instance where she clearly violates general vegetarian protocol (marshmallows, we should agree, is a gray area).  In the logic tradition and in real world common sense 'no instance of violating vegetarian protocol' + 'numerous instances of demonstrating vegetarian behavior' = 'the fair assumption that Marzipan is a vegetarian.'  Put simply, I think your standard of proof is unnecessarily high.  My standard is the one practiced in the disciplines of Philosophy, History, English, and Behavioral Psychology, to name a few, and ought to be sufficient for a silly cartoon web site.  Your challenge does not need to be answered because a reasonable and sufficient argument has already been offered (not "just speculation"), not only by myself, but by Bryanc as well.  Again, a contrary example is all you need to prove our contention false.  [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 04:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::She could just be stupid, ignorant, or misinformed.  This could also be a mistake by The Brothers Chaps. [[User:70.58.71.12|70.58.71.12]] 05:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::Speaking of stupid, ignorant, or misinformed, how about those vegetarians? {snicker}.  Seriously though, I would have to agree in the end that it probably is just a mistake (and an understandable and forgivable one at that) by TBC; this would seem the most likely explanation for the perceived inconsistency. [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 07:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
:::::Lynx, I don't need to prove she's not anything. The natural presumption is that people are like most other people unless there is evidence to the contrary. I maintain that calling her a vegetarian is speculative unless there is firm evidence. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::I think what Lynx is trying to argue is that there is quite a lot of evidence.  Each piece of evidence alone may be interpreted as circumstantial, but the summation of it all lends great credence to the probability that Marzipan is indeed a vegetarian.  You are absolutely correct that there is no definitive proof.  She sure eats like one though.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 04:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
::::::Qermaq, I didn't say you needed to prove anything- you have it backwards.  I said that if you want to end all doubt and vindicate your position there is a simple way.  I didn't say "you need to ''prove''", I said "what you ''need'' to prove."  There's a real difference there.  I won't continue to rehash this topic with you, but I do want to say for the sake of others reading this that there ''is'' evidence that she is a vegetarian, the assumption is a reasonable one, not a speculative one, according to classical epistemology.  Instead of yielding to better reasoning, my friend Qermaq seems to be ignoring the firm evidence provided and misinterpreting what I have said.  I would that he follow my example from above (the BIAS discussion) and simply admit when he is beat.  I will say no more.  [[User:Lynx|Lynx]] 06:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
::::On the [[Chinese Food Toons Menu]] TBC imply ''very'' strongly that Marzipan is a vegetarian in the subtext to [[The Reddest Radish]].  Also, if this is being questioned than it follows that [[The Luau]], [[Marzipan]], and [[Old-Timey Marzipan]] all should be re-worded also.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 03:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
::::Incidentally, the word vegan was [http://www.vegansociety.com/html/business/trademark/opportunities/standards.php coined] by The Vegan Society in the UK which still retains related trademarks.  A mascara company would not likely be granted permission to use the word as a brand name, even if the product was vegan.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 04:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::You're confusing reality with the toon. I am not suggesting that "vegan" is indeed a brand name or even eligible to be one. I'm saying that in the H*R universe it could be intended as such. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::I meant that as a sort of trivial interjection, but even so, why would they choose that particular brand name?{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 04:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
:Gelatin is sort of a gray area for some vegetarians, so are dairy products and eggs.  Certainly there are vegetarians who will not eat them, vegans definitely won't, but I do know several vegetarians who do eat such things.  I'm actually not against mentioning this fact in the article really, just wanted to mention that.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 03:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::No, it isn't.  Just like meat, gelatin comes from the dead body of an animal.  Dairy products and eggs are clearly gray areas, but gelatin is *not*. [[User:70.58.71.12|70.58.71.12]] 05:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::Further, this is ''Chilean Sea'' Marshmallow. Maybe it's a naturally-occurring plant life form, like the sea cucumber? Or maybe it's a soy-based marshmallow substitute? (What we really need is an Explanation about sea bass...) —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]]
 
-
:::It ''is'' possible to make vegetarian/vegan marshmallows without using gelatin. Given that Marzipan's exact status as a non-meat-eater is fuzzy, I think it would be a stretch to draw any kind of conclusion from the fact that she eats a marshmallow (which hardly count as food anyway). — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
: 1 - The [[Marzipan]] article clearly states that she is a vegetarian.
 
-
: 2 - Although the specific type of vegetarianism that Marzipan follows is not known, eating gelatin is against *all* of them.  The [[Wikipedia:Vegetarian|wikipedia article]] has a good discussion of the various types.  You will note that all of them decry the eating of meat (remains of dead animals.)
 
-
: Thus, this is pretty clearly a goof to me. [[User:70.58.71.12|70.58.71.12]] 05:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::re: 1 - Yes it does, but when it comes to citations we can't cite ourselves.
 
-
::re: 2 - I can't knowledgeably comment on this, suffice to say that I know more than one self-proclaimed vegetarians who will eat gelatin.  Perhaps that makes them not-really-vegetarians.
 
-
::Dot com has already pointed out that there are readily available recipes to make marshmallow's that are both vegetarian and vegan.{{User:Bryanc/sig}} 05:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::Correct.  A "vegetarian" who eats gelatin is no more a true vegetarian than one who eats chicken or beef.  I do concede that there are vegetarian marshmallow recipes, though. [[User:70.58.71.12|70.58.71.12]] 14:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::I strongly agree with Bryanc in all three points. As a non-gelatin-eating vegetarian, I say this is not a goof. Also, if anybody feels any further need to discuss whether Marzipan is a veg(etari)an or not, then this talk page is ''not'' the place to do it. Please do this at [[Talk:Marzipan#Vegetarian or vegan?]]. Thanks.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 07:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Pledge? ==
 
-
 
-
Would it be relevant to include an explanation of what a 'pledge' is in the Explanations section?  There must be at least some people who would benefit from the knowledge (myself included).--[[User:Tally Solleni|Tally Solleni]] 16:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Sure — I'll try to add a little bit, and feel free to edit it if you can improve it. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== How Was Your Coincidence? ==
 
-
 
-
It's probably not a direct reference, but I can't help but notice one of Marzipan's lines ("My almond-encrusted Chilean sea marshmallow was just delicious. How was your hot dog?") is strikingly similar to Veronica Lodge's line from the cover of Archie #547, which I read in the Editor's Notebook. ("My lobster thermador was superb!  How was your hot dog?") [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 06:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I'd say that's reference material.  I felt like Marzipan's "how was your hot dog?" was something that I'd heard/seen before, but I'm not at all familar with Archie.  Maybe the gag has been used in other works?  (A quick web search doesn't turn up anything in particular; not even the Archie quote.)  --[[User:Rriegs|Rriegs]] 10:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::I just thought it was a coincidence because I didn't catch any other references to Archie. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 20:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== "Bod" reference ==
 
-
 
-
Homestar's line "That you--gulp--'want his bod'?" is pretty close to the line dropped by Strong Bad in [[lady...ing]], "Oh, Marzipan. Do you want a-my bod!"  Anyone think it's worth a mention in the article?  --[[User:Rriegs|Rriegs]] 10:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
:I think it is. [[User:Jimmy91|Jimmy91]] 17:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Reminiscent? ==
 
-
 
-
*Homestar and Strong Bad singing as their ship sinks is reminiscent of how the orchestra on the RMS Titanic continued to play while she sank.
 
-
 
-
Didn't a fun fact just get destroyed recently due to that word? Personally, I don't see any similarity at all between the two, but somehow I didn't feel right just outright removing it... anyone? -{{User:YK/sig}} 07:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Bought a bod? ==
 
-
 
-
I keep hearing "gulp - bought his bod?" Has Marzipan paying TC to do this? [[User:The Magic Pixel|The Magic Pixel]] 15:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I would suggest that you get a nice set of headphones, go into a quiet room, and listen to it again. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 16:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Wharf? ==
 
-
 
-
When the USS Flirtini sinks, the water becomes wide and expansive, could this be the wharfs that have been alluded to? Or is it just for pseudo-dramatic effect? [[User:Strong Sader|Strong Sader]] 16:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:It could be either; the facts is, we don't really know. TBC tend not to make connections like these. They often comment on how much they ''don't'' plan things out on their website and how inconsistent it is. On the other hand, you never know what they think while they make the toon. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 17:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:: I always figured that since they were launched backwards, the river was connected to a lake, which they ended up in.
 
-
 
-
== Capers? ==
 
-
 
-
Can someone explain "capers" to me? What does he mean by that? At first I thought he was meaning "Never seeing each other again, with kippers." as in like, a meal with fish as a side dish. But capers? Can I get an explanation please? -[[User:Abelhawk|Abelhawk]] 13:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
:[[wikipedia:capers#Culinary_Uses]] [[User:DeFender1031|DeFender1031]] 13:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Closed STUFF ==
 
-
 
-
{{stuffcloseddecline}}
 
-
 
-
=== Thank you, chef! But our reference is in another castle. ===
 
-
{{stufffact|Strong Bad's greeting, "it's-a me! The chef-a!" is a play on [[Wikipedia:Mario|Mario]]'s famous line, "It's a-me, Mario!".}}
 
-
{{stuffverdict|16:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)|22:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)|declined|29|21. A proposed revision was also declined, 31-2|Date Nite}}
 
-
 
-
{{stuffcloseddecline}}
 
-
 
-
=== I can do it. I can do it sixteen times. ===
 
-
{{stufffact|Marzipan strokes her right eyelashes with mascara 16 times.}}
 
-
{{stuffverdict|22:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)|14:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)|declined|38|17|Date Nite}}
 
-
 
-
== Strong Bad's Location ==
 
-
 
-
I've confirmed this by looking at the flash file in frames, so don't change it (It's in the transcript):  Strong bad is already in Marzipan's house when he says "head."
 
-
 
-
== Public Rage-o ==
 
-
 
-
Is it just a coincidence that "Public Rage-o" sounds a lot like "Public Radio"? You have to sound it out a bit but the resemblance is uncanny. --[[User:Echeese|Echeese]] 19:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Curse? ==
 
-
 
-
I know Missy Palmer/Marzipan have only said "crap" once, but I distinctly keep hearing, "Homestar, if you're trying to say I look like a f***sy mama..." Anyone else? {{User:WeirdAl/sig}} 20:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
:Umm, no, not at all. Foxy Mama makes sense, especially in the context of "fox's mother". [[User:DeFender1031|DeFender1031]] 20:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
Oh. You're right. I listened again, and it's just her inflection. My bad! {{User:WeirdAl/sig}} 00:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Count Fiveguardo ==
 
-
 
-
I know it's just an insult, but how notable is it that Homestar counts past Marzipan's claim of four in [[HomestarRunner.com: PAY PLUS!|HomestarRunner.com PAY PLUS!]]? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:He's reading from a cue card there.
 
-
 
-
== Or is it THE Marzipan now? ==
 
-
 
-
I think that the fact Homestar comments that Marzipan's name might have a 'the' in front of it is referencing the magority of characters that have 'the' as a title eg. the king of town, the cheat, the homestar runner.
 
-
:Yes, it's definitely a reference to the [[integral article]]. In fact, this is already mentioned in inside references. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::Noes, I think it's that Homestar is hinting that The Cheat and Marzipan are steady, and wives will often adopt their husband's last names, so it makes sense... a little bit. -Werghy (Image codes stink)
 
-
 
-
==It'sa me!==
 
-
 
-
Any one else think that's from Mario 64? [[User:Marvelrulez|Marvelrulez]] 17:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:See [[#Mario|above]] {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Fabrosi's fake mustache ==
 
-
 
-
I made the following addition to the Inside References section, which was promptly deleted.  I think this is bogus, so someone back me up here.
 
-
 
-
**The Cheat's fake mustache may be a reference to [[lady...ing]], in which Fabrosi is said to use a fake mustache when lady-ing.
 
-
 
-
== lack of visible arms reference ==
 
-
 
-
when The Cheat holds out his arm for Marzipan to hook her arm around, isn't that a reference to the lack of visible arms? Its also mentioned in the commentary as well. --[[User:Zonis|Zonis]] 06:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Changing font ==
 
-
 
-
Does anyone notice that the font on the "Hot Vegan" eyeliner changes fonts?
 

Your changes will be visible immediately. If you would like to test or practice editing, please do so in the sandbox. You are encouraged to create, expand, and improve upon articles; however, bad edits to articles are watched for and will be quickly removed.


CAPTCHA Image
Image Code:
Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
You are required to enter a code from an image in order to perform certain operations. This image is designed to protect the site from vandalism. If the images are too obscured to read, just give it your best shot and a new image will be shown next time. If you are visually impaired or limited to text-based browsing, you can contact the site administrator and something can be arranged. The code is not case-sensitive.

The Homestar Runner Wiki is neither owned by nor affiliated with homestarrunner.com. Much of the material presented here is copyrighted by The Brothers Chaps and/or Harmless Junk, Inc. For more information, see the legal stuff page on the official Homestar Runner website. The proprietor of this site asserts that publication of such material on the wiki qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.

Material on this site that is not copyrighted by The Brothers Chaps (e.g. opinions and mindless chatter) is licensed to the various authors, where indicated, and is released under a Creative Commons Deed, which simply ensures that none of this information may legally be used for commercial purposes.

Personal tools