Talk:Bogus Mathematical Theorems

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Rename?: no rename)
Line 5: Line 5:
:::But not as catchy. Nor official. "Bogus" is the only one that works. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
:::But not as catchy. Nor official. "Bogus" is the only one that works. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
::::The title's fine. We don't have to be as uptight as Wikipedia and can use the language used by TBC themselves when they are available rather than more formal language. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
::::The title's fine. We don't have to be as uptight as Wikipedia and can use the language used by TBC themselves when they are available rather than more formal language. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 +
==Wow==
 +
The one about the property of ones looks like something out of a textbook. Any way we can revise the other ones? Maybe? If they need to be? --{{User:Color Printer/sig}} 02:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:14, 4 October 2007

Rename?

I don't know. It seems like "bogus" isn't a good word for this title... --TheYellowDart(t/c) 20:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

That's how Strong Bad himself introduced them. --DorianGray 20:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
True, and though "bogus" is an accurate description, "false" or "fictional" would be much more encyclopedic. — SamSF%20sig.jpgFisher (Come in, Lambert.) 20:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
But not as catchy. Nor official. "Bogus" is the only one that works. --DorianGray 20:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
The title's fine. We don't have to be as uptight as Wikipedia and can use the language used by TBC themselves when they are available rather than more formal language. Heimstern Läufer 20:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Wow

The one about the property of ones looks like something out of a textbook. Any way we can revise the other ones? Maybe? If they need to be? --Color Printer 02:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)