Editing Talk:Beth

{{ttbd}}
Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias against anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
:::I have nothing against anonymous edits per se (I did that for a couple years before getting an account), but I feel that if something as major as page creation should be left to those with accounts, or at least anonymous page creations should be more closely scrutinized. Mainly it is about accountability (why was the page made?  Is there a point? Does it add something to the Wiki as a whole?).  A named user can be held accountable and shown what to do better than an IP address.  Vandalism or even frivolous page creations (as it appears this page is) should be discouraged, and it is more likely to come from anonymous contributors. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 18:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
'''Delete''': does not measure up to our inclusion guidelines: only two occurrances and not notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{deletedtalk}}
+{{ttbd}}
 Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 :Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :::I have nothing against anonymous edits per se (I did that for a couple years before getting an account), but I feel that if something as major as page creation should be left to those with accounts, or at least anonymous page creations should be more closely scrutinized. Mainly it is about accountability (why was the page made?  Is there a point? Does it add something to the Wiki as a whole?).  A named user can be held accountable and shown what to do better than an IP address.  Vandalism or even frivolous page creations (as it appears this page is) should be discouraged, and it is more likely to come from anonymous contributors. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 18:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 '''Delete''': does not measure up to our inclusion guidelines: only two occurrances and not notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
-:Not enough appearances. '''DELETE'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
-::Definitely a coincidence. '''Delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 14:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
-It's only a name.  DELETE. --[[User:Acam30|Acam30]] 01:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
-'''Delete'''- This article makes it sound like he's talking about the same person.  Which is unlikely unless Strong Bad personally knows [[Leomard Sportsinterviews]] and/or the girl who inspired that page in the book, assuming it's even a real girl, and assuming the girl he mentions in [[the process]] is a real girl, which is also unlikely.... .... .... too much.  This page is ridiculous.--[[User:Antisexy|Antisexy]] 02:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)