HRWiki talk:Image summary cleanup/a-o
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→For the Record: reply) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::But that link just says what the policy is, and not why, which is what BBG is asking, I think. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135|128.103.10.135]] 22:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | ::But that link just says what the policy is, and not why, which is what BBG is asking, I think. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135|128.103.10.135]] 22:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Why? Because it has to be done in some way, so if it was the other way, someone would be asking about that and why this isn't the format. In short, there's gotta be one standard, and that's apparently the one we've chosen. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | :::Why? Because it has to be done in some way, so if it was the other way, someone would be asking about that and why this isn't the format. In short, there's gotta be one standard, and that's apparently the one we've chosen. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::So, "nothing in particular", basically? -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135|128.103.10.135]] 17:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:29, 28 March 2009
For the Record
What exactly makes "as seen in Jibblies 2" (which is the format I've been using for two years) worse than "(from Jibblies 2)"? 
BBG 23:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- HRWiki:Image_use_policy#Specifics. — Defender1031*Talk 23:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- But that link just says what the policy is, and not why, which is what BBG is asking, I think. -128.103.10.135 22:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Why? Because it has to be done in some way, so if it was the other way, someone would be asking about that and why this isn't the format. In short, there's gotta be one standard, and that's apparently the one we've chosen. — Defender1031*Talk 17:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- So, "nothing in particular", basically? -128.103.10.135 17:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Why? Because it has to be done in some way, so if it was the other way, someone would be asking about that and why this isn't the format. In short, there's gotta be one standard, and that's apparently the one we've chosen. — Defender1031*Talk 17:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- But that link just says what the policy is, and not why, which is what BBG is asking, I think. -128.103.10.135 22:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
