Talk:51
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Revision as of 06:17, 28 November 2009 by Heimstern Läufer (Talk | contribs)
Totally disjointed
So this page is called "51", but as it stands, it has one instance of 51, one instance of -51, which isn't quite the same thing. and one instance of -1, which is completely not the same thing. There appears to be nothing special about 51. Delete hard and fast. — Defender1031*Talk 19:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Although I added an appearence, I don't really see the point of this page. At the very least, we should remove the 1 appearence. That's completly unrelated. We could change it to +/- 51 and keep the three instances. Would three be enough to keep it? Philip8o 19:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It is slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Regardless of what happens, remove the -1. It doesn't belong. Without it, we have a somewhat interesting phenomenon of using 51 as a score multiple times. Why that number each time? It's at least mildly interesting that they chose the same number (well, technically the same absolute value, but sometimes positive and sometimes negative) each time. Is it interesting enough for an article? I could be swayed yes or maybe no. I'm not convinced one way or another. Heimstern Läufer
06:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Regardless of what happens, remove the -1. It doesn't belong. Without it, we have a somewhat interesting phenomenon of using 51 as a score multiple times. Why that number each time? It's at least mildly interesting that they chose the same number (well, technically the same absolute value, but sometimes positive and sometimes negative) each time. Is it interesting enough for an article? I could be swayed yes or maybe no. I'm not convinced one way or another. Heimstern Läufer
- Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It is slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
