Talk:Stinkoman and 1-Up's Relationship

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 04:46, 4 July 2009 by Elcool (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Your James Over

No. No. The Character Relationship articles are only for the main 12 and only then when there is something significant about it. Delete wbwolf (t | ed) 13:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't even think there needs to be a discussion. We don't keep relationship pages about any but the main characters. — Defender1031*Talk 18:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
I think this should be deleted because of the rule that you can only do the main 12. Honestly, this page is very poorly written and while that can be fixed, I have no idea how. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 15:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree with you XX2, relationship pages should only be between the 12 main characters and the page is poor written. My vote: Delete.--'Record307 Talk/Contribs 15:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
And aside from the blanket rule thing, the relationship isn't all that interesting. The salient parts could be (and probably are already) on their respective character pages. -132.183.138.86 15:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
If we keep this article, it's just going to open the floodgates and there'd be a muddle. The relationships between minor characters should be discussed on their respective articles, not on character-type articles. Delete.The Chort 18:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I haven't decided yet if this article is worth keeping, but from where exactly did you get the notion that relationship articles are only for the Main 12? I oppose this, and I would gladly support a good article the explores a relationship between a main and a minor character, or even two minor characters. What floodgates are you talking about? Those of some new interesting articles? Those of a few deletion discussions? We do this regularly anyways. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools