Talk:Erweenga

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(No: Nothing you said improves your arguement.)
m (No: And another thing, you ate part of my message. *sobs*)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{ttbd}}
{{ttbd}}
-
Seriously? A character who was given 5 seconds air time, doesn't exist, and is merely a doodle? We really don't need this. At all.--[[User:Jellote|Jellote wuz here]] 18:07, 5 December 2009 (
+
Seriously? A character who was given 5 seconds air time, doesn't exist, and is merely a doodle? We really don't need this. At all.--[[User:Jellote|Jellote wuz here]] 18:07, 5 December 2009 (UCT)
Yes
Yes

Revision as of 02:16, 6 December 2009

No

Seriously? A character who was given 5 seconds air time, doesn't exist, and is merely a doodle? We really don't need this. At all.--Jellote wuz here 18:07, 5 December 2009 (UCT)

Yes

Erweenga is awesome and he should exist!Jellote, WAT R U TALKING ABOUT?!


WTF HE SHOULD EXIST!

Sorry, anonny. This only appeared once. The guidelines state this had to appear at least three times. It only appeared once. So delete, no discussion.--Record307 Talk/Contribs 18:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
That's for running gags. In regards to characters, it technically only needs to appear once. That said, "Erweenga" is not actually a character, and does not need a page. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 19:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Oops, sorry. Don't remember the list time I checked the guidelines. As for this, a minor book character then.--Record307 Talk/Contribs 21:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
When i saw the part about a stripèd worm, i thought of The Worm. Then i watched this toon, and Erweenga definitely doesn't need a page. The Knights Who Say Ni 22:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Vulgarity does not justify existance. Awesomeness (which he shows no sign of in his five seconds of non-movement, anyway) does not justify existance. Yelling does not justify existance. And lastly, erweenga does not justify making weird pages.--Jellote wuz here 02:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools