Talk:Punkin
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (what else is there to say?) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::You haven't given a reason WHY we should merge them. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | :::You haven't given a reason WHY we should merge them. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::I like dotcom's idea for the title. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.181|132.183.151.181]] 01:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | ::::I like dotcom's idea for the title. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.181|132.183.151.181]] 01:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::DeF: Besides "similar, and kinda short" pages about "irregular pronunciations for 'Pumpkin'"? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 02:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:01, 14 October 2009
Punkin=Pumpakin?
Didnt know which to say it on, but this and pumpakin are similar, and kinda short. Can't we merge them somehow? StrongAwesome74 01:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- No. Any attempt to merge would get awkward. A page called "Irregular pronunciations for 'Pumpkin'" just wouldn't work as well as these two short and sweet articles. — Defender1031*Talk 01:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing as StrongAwesome74. There's gotta be a way. "Punkin/Pumpakin" with individual redirects, perhaps. — It's dot com 01:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't given a reason WHY we should merge them. — Defender1031*Talk 01:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I like dotcom's idea for the title. -132.183.151.181 01:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- DeF: Besides "similar, and kinda short" pages about "irregular pronunciations for 'Pumpkin'"? — It's dot com 02:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I like dotcom's idea for the title. -132.183.151.181 01:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't given a reason WHY we should merge them. — Defender1031*Talk 01:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing as StrongAwesome74. There's gotta be a way. "Punkin/Pumpakin" with individual redirects, perhaps. — It's dot com 01:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
