File talk:firstbubs.png
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Vandal Fuel) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::::I kind of like this image. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 22:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | :::::I kind of like this image. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 22:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::I'm pretty sure it's just one vandal with a dynamic IP address or utilizing proxies anyway. We can't dictate our image policy to "those that vandals aren't using". We're using the image, so we can't delete it, and there's nothing more we can do that's not needlessly draconian. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ::::::I'm pretty sure it's just one vandal with a dynamic IP address or utilizing proxies anyway. We can't dictate our image policy to "those that vandals aren't using". We're using the image, so we can't delete it, and there's nothing more we can do that's not needlessly draconian. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | You're right "Jay", I'm the only one that uses this image. Mwahahahahahaaaaa. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - a vandal guy | ||
Revision as of 18:00, 7 September 2009
Vandal Fuel
Is it me, or do vandals use this image a lot? The one today couldn't stop, and that one guy replaced all the character images on the Characters page with it. Is there any way to stop this page from being added willy nilly? Probably not, but can someone see if we can? --Jellote wuz here 21:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well do we need it?
Espemon333 22:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- You might want to request an extension that scans a file's page for a <includeonlyonpage>PageName</includeonlyonpage> tag. You can do so at the MediaWiki website somewhere.
ColdReactive 22:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, we need it, Espemon333. I don't see why we need to give this image any special treatment though. We have thousands (millions?) of images on this wiki and if we add an extension to this one image, they'll just use another image. So what would be the point? Just revert all their edits and move on. And hey, I'd rather they'd post this image everywhere than use something obscene and disgusting. – The Chort 22:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- The Chort DOES have a point. Espemon333 22:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I kind of like this image. free 22:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it's just one vandal with a dynamic IP address or utilizing proxies anyway. We can't dictate our image policy to "those that vandals aren't using". We're using the image, so we can't delete it, and there's nothing more we can do that's not needlessly draconian. --Jay (Gobble) 22:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I kind of like this image. free 22:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- The Chort DOES have a point.
- Yes, we need it, Espemon333. I don't see why we need to give this image any special treatment though. We have thousands (millions?) of images on this wiki and if we add an extension to this one image, they'll just use another image. So what would be the point? Just revert all their edits and move on. And hey, I'd rather they'd post this image everywhere than use something obscene and disgusting. – The Chort 22:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- You might want to request an extension that scans a file's page for a <includeonlyonpage>PageName</includeonlyonpage> tag. You can do so at the MediaWiki website somewhere.
You're right "Jay", I'm the only one that uses this image. Mwahahahahahaaaaa.
- a vandal guy
