Talk:Strong Bad and Senor Cardgage's Relationship
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Delete: Oh yeah. My opinion.) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Delete: okay, i'm wrong) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{tbd}} | {{tbd}} | ||
== Delete == | == Delete == | ||
- | Once again, main characters only. '''delete'''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | + | <s>Once again, main characters only. '''delete'''.</s> {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |
*I agree completely. '''DELETE'''-Espemon333 | *I agree completely. '''DELETE'''-Espemon333 | ||
**Yeah, '''delete''' | **Yeah, '''delete''' | ||
:::Once again, main characters only is absolutely '''not''' a rule. I would be somewhat interested to see how this one would shape up, but my immediate thought is that it would likely be a bit too one-sided, with the only content suggesting SB's admiration for SC. That would be a problem. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | :::Once again, main characters only is absolutely '''not''' a rule. I would be somewhat interested to see how this one would shape up, but my immediate thought is that it would likely be a bit too one-sided, with the only content suggesting SB's admiration for SC. That would be a problem. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Well, SB's creeped out at SC in sbemail201. EDIT: If this turns into a legitimate article, then I have no problem with it. But, it's died. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 00:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ::::Well, SB's creeped out at SC in sbemail201. EDIT: If this turns into a legitimate article, then I have no problem with it. But, it's died. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 00:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::I have just been informed that there is no such rule. In which case, i'm switching to '''neutral''' given the total lack of content. I'd have to see where this goes before forming an opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:47, 15 July 2009
Delete
Once again, main characters only. delete. — Defender1031*Talk 23:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree completely. DELETE-Espemon333
- Yeah, delete
- Once again, main characters only is absolutely not a rule. I would be somewhat interested to see how this one would shape up, but my immediate thought is that it would likely be a bit too one-sided, with the only content suggesting SB's admiration for SC. That would be a problem. Heimstern Läufer
00:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, SB's creeped out at SC in sbemail201. EDIT: If this turns into a legitimate article, then I have no problem with it. But, it's died. free 00:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have just been informed that there is no such rule. In which case, i'm switching to neutral given the total lack of content. I'd have to see where this goes before forming an opinion. — Defender1031*Talk 00:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, SB's creeped out at SC in sbemail201. EDIT: If this turns into a legitimate article, then I have no problem with it. But, it's died. free 00:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Once again, main characters only is absolutely not a rule. I would be somewhat interested to see how this one would shape up, but my immediate thought is that it would likely be a bit too one-sided, with the only content suggesting SB's admiration for SC. That would be a problem. Heimstern Läufer