Talk:The Cheat Being Eaten

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Keep?: What about keeping it?)
(→Keep?: you missed something)
Line 13: Line 13:
:I agree with anonny, even if we expand it to all times characters get eaten, it seems to me to be less of a running joke and more of just something that has happened a few times without any real connection. I say we '''delort''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
:I agree with anonny, even if we expand it to all times characters get eaten, it seems to me to be less of a running joke and more of just something that has happened a few times without any real connection. I say we '''delort''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
::But there's four references of The Cheat being eaten, [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines|that's usually enough]] for a running gag. So why not '''keep''' the article how it is? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
::But there's four references of The Cheat being eaten, [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines|that's usually enough]] for a running gag. So why not '''keep''' the article how it is? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::It also says that there's gotta be some connection between said instances. '''Still delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:09, 10 May 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Keep?

Do I has? Do we needs? Does I english? Keep --Jellote 22:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC), who speaks English as a native language, by the way.

I say Move to Characters Being Eaten. ColdReactive 22:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
But that's not a page, Iyeru ColdReactive. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 23:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
That's why I said Move not Merge. ColdReactive 23:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Hm... how many examples of non-The-Cheat character-eating are there? I can come up with one for Strong Bad, which is already mentioned as it involves Teh C. as well, and one for... well, Strong Bad (kind of)... --Jay (Gobble) 23:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
And how to cook a wrestleman ColdReactive 23:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
...Which I already mentioned? --Jay (Gobble) 23:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
But all I want to know is: If we make a page about that is it noteable? --Jellote 22:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I know the difference between moving and merging now. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 22:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I dunno, I'm usually a supporter of most pages, but something about this one doesn't do it for me. Usually running gags are somehow connected, but it seems to me that these examples are all distinct jokes which happen to share a common concept. -132.183.138.141 00:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree with anonny, even if we expand it to all times characters get eaten, it seems to me to be less of a running joke and more of just something that has happened a few times without any real connection. I say we 'delort. — Defender1031*Talk 22:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
But there's four references of The Cheat being eaten, that's usually enough for a running gag. So why not keep the article how it is? – The Chort 16:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
It also says that there's gotta be some connection between said instances. Still delete — Defender1031*Talk 18:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:The_Cheat_Being_Eaten"