Talk:List of Running Gags

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Rerun?: Agree)
(My thirteen cents)
Line 3: Line 3:
Haven't we had this sort of article before?  And it was turned down before because the category covers it much better?  I still feel this is the case; running gags are liable to expand over time, whereas other categories turned into articles (e.g., [[Character Evolutions]]) are rather fixed. '''Delete, please''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 02:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Haven't we had this sort of article before?  And it was turned down before because the category covers it much better?  I still feel this is the case; running gags are liable to expand over time, whereas other categories turned into articles (e.g., [[Character Evolutions]]) are rather fixed. '''Delete, please''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 02:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
:Agreed. Unless this page can somehow offer something the category doesn't (which, at present, it doesn't), then there's no advantage of a static list over a self-updating category page. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 02:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
:Agreed. Unless this page can somehow offer something the category doesn't (which, at present, it doesn't), then there's no advantage of a static list over a self-updating category page. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 02:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
::[[:Category:Running Gags]] will give you [[the exact same]] thing, so why make a page that is [[the exact same]] as another page that ''will'' self-update?? It makes no sense. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 04:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:13, 21 February 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Rerun?

Haven't we had this sort of article before? And it was turned down before because the category covers it much better? I still feel this is the case; running gags are liable to expand over time, whereas other categories turned into articles (e.g., Character Evolutions) are rather fixed. Delete, please wbwolf (t | ed) 02:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Unless this page can somehow offer something the category doesn't (which, at present, it doesn't), then there's no advantage of a static list over a self-updating category page. --phlip TC 02:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Category:Running Gags will give you the exact same thing, so why make a page that is the exact same as another page that will self-update?? It makes no sense. — MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 04:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Running_Gags"
Personal tools