Talk:The Dapper Swindler

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→What The CRAP?!)
(→What The CRAP?!)
Line 31: Line 31:
::It is debatable, however, whether The Dapper Swindler can be considered a separate character. It's really just a bad sketch of The Sneak. I say '''merge''' with [[The Sneak]]. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 15:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
::It is debatable, however, whether The Dapper Swindler can be considered a separate character. It's really just a bad sketch of The Sneak. I say '''merge''' with [[The Sneak]]. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 15:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
-
YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that [[biscut dough hands man]] is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. [[user:haldo]]
+
YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that [[Biscut Dough Hands Man]] is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. [[user:haldo]]

Revision as of 19:16, 3 November 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. - Dr Haggis - Talk 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)

I agree. I've added the text back. -- Tom 19:30, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)

Contents

no

this belongs on The Sneak-- Benol, aka Coach B 20:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

It only appers once, i might add. 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)user:haldo

Please note that this conversation was about two years ago. Obviously, for better or worse, we've decided to keep it separate. --DorianGray 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

yes

this belongs on its own page. — talk Bubsty edits 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Old Timey manifestation of Biscuit Dough Hands Man?

As I was reading this page, I was reminded of the poor rendering of Strong Bad as Biscuit Dough Hands Man. Could this be another accidental equivalent?

Well, if The Dapper Swindler was a dubious rendering of Old-Timey Strong Bad, I'd say yes. But since it isn't... 71.231.56.40 21:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah, but do we KNOW that Buscuit Dough Hands Man *IS* Strong Bad? --Jrgilby 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

What The CRAP?!

Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? — Haldo (Talk | contribs) 19:50 (left unsigned)

Put {{tbd}} on the top of the page and we'll discuss it. The Goblin!! 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... user:haldo

Done. And all characters, no matter how many appearances they have, merit page. Keep. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man 13:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
It is debatable, however, whether The Dapper Swindler can be considered a separate character. It's really just a bad sketch of The Sneak. I say merge with The Sneak. — Has Matt? (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that Biscut Dough Hands Man is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. user:haldo

Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:The_Dapper_Swindler"
Personal tools