Talk:Homestar's Teeth
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Discussion: reply) |
(delete) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:That can be noted [[Inconsistencies within the Homestar Runner universe|here]] instead, so '''delete''' this page. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 13:03, 16 June 2007 | :That can be noted [[Inconsistencies within the Homestar Runner universe|here]] instead, so '''delete''' this page. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 13:03, 16 June 2007 | ||
::It looks like that was added and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Inconsistencies_within_the_Homestar_Runner_universe&diff=467162&oldid=467161 removed}}, but at any rate it's mentioned on [[Lack of Visible Arms]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | ::It looks like that was added and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Inconsistencies_within_the_Homestar_Runner_universe&diff=467162&oldid=467161 removed}}, but at any rate it's mentioned on [[Lack of Visible Arms]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::This is also mentioned in [[underlings]]. Do we have an article about how in "flashback" Strong Bad claimed he lost count around email 51, but knew "caffeine" was 91? No. '''Delete.''' However, I think maybe it should also be mentioned on IWTHRU since it does seem like an inconsistency to me. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:36, 17 June 2007
Discussion
This content is currently covered by Lack of Visible Arms#Teeth, and I think it's minor enough that that section is sufficient. I move that we turn this page into a redirect to the above link. Trey56 16:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- That can be noted here instead, so delete this page. — Sam
Fisher (Come in, Lambert.) 13:03, 16 June 2007
- It looks like that was added and removed, but at any rate it's mentioned on Lack of Visible Arms.
Trey56 17:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- This is also mentioned in underlings. Do we have an article about how in "flashback" Strong Bad claimed he lost count around email 51, but knew "caffeine" was 91? No. Delete. However, I think maybe it should also be mentioned on IWTHRU since it does seem like an inconsistency to me. – The Chort 18:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- It looks like that was added and removed, but at any rate it's mentioned on Lack of Visible Arms.