User talk:Jmoney

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Welcome!)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
== Your message to User:1upoman ==
 
-
 
-
You recently left this message for User:1upoman:
 
-
"hey 1-up o man, its jmoney. let me ask tho thy question. do tho has what it takes to join the Jaxplosioarmy?"
 
-
There is no user by that username. Therefore, we are deleting the talk page your message is on. If you figure out the username you meant to use, you can copy the message from here. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 
-
:There is a [[HRFWiki:User:1Upoman|1Upoman]] on the fanstuff wiki - maybe you meant to post that there? {{User:Phlip/sig}} 02:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
== Making good article edits ==
 
-
 
-
Hey, I see you're making some edits to the main namespace. That's great. I don't know anything about the Podstar stuff so I'll leave that aside, but I wanted to call your attention to the style of writing we use here. In references, we don't get "chatty" and say things like "I have noticed" or that. We sometimes refer to it as "encyclopedic" writing, where we keep opinion and our identity out of the writing. So rather than write "I noticed there's no link back to the whatever page " like we'd say on a Talk page, we'd probably say "At the end of this toon, there is no link back to ..." like that. Make sense? Feel free to ask if you aren't sure. Keep on tranglin'. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 19:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
Thanks. I tend to ramble alot, see my user page.
 
-
 
-
== Please help ==
 
-
 
-
if i make a bad edit, im sorry. I try my best to keep to the standard, but its hard sometimes. Please tell me if you change something of mine, and if i get to annoying with constant changes, tell me and i will cease. -jmoney
 
-
 
-
:Hey Jmoney. Don't worry if someone changes or deletes your edits. It happens all the time to everybody, it's the way we all work together here on the wiki. If you're not sure why someone changed your edits, click on the history tab of that article to see who made changes and what their edit summaries were. Oh, and a little tip: to sign your comments on talk pages, simply write four tildes: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. They will automatically be replaced with your name and signature, like this:{{User:Loafing/sig}} 02:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
== Where to discuss ==
== Where to discuss ==
Dear Jmoney, a good place to discuss details of an article's content is on the talk page for that article (the "discussion" tab). It's not as good to leave lengthy discussion in edit summaries and log summaries (because it's hard to actually have a discussion there), and still less good to leave long notes in invisicomments (because no one sees them except by accident). Also, JoeyDay isn't as active with the day-to-day operations as a lot of other people are, so a general help question should go on [[HRWiki talk:FAQ]] or, as noted above, the article talk page. Hope that helps! Keep on tranglin'. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear Jmoney, a good place to discuss details of an article's content is on the talk page for that article (the "discussion" tab). It's not as good to leave lengthy discussion in edit summaries and log summaries (because it's hard to actually have a discussion there), and still less good to leave long notes in invisicomments (because no one sees them except by accident). Also, JoeyDay isn't as active with the day-to-day operations as a lot of other people are, so a general help question should go on [[HRWiki talk:FAQ]] or, as noted above, the article talk page. Hope that helps! Keep on tranglin'. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
-
::Ok, what I was basing my descisions on were complete ignorance. So in my obsolete mind I thought it ok to put an explanation of what I did and why before some one went into the thing and changed it. I was expecting that they wouldn't have the sense to look there. The reason i commented them out is because I thought that the section I posted there was only needed for the modifiers of the page. But as I said before all of that was wrong besides the sb-chalk board glitch. And the reason I posted at Joey Day is because he was the highest position I knew, and I KNEW that he would be able to stop what I did with little nasty backwash. Thanks for your time and patience, [[User:Jmoney|-Jmoney]] 12:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC) (P.S. it wasn't a question I posted.)
+
::Ok, what I was basing my descisions on were complete ignorance. So in my obsolete mind I thought it ok to put an explanation of what I did and why before some one went into the thing and changed it. I was expecting that they wouldn't have the sense to look there. The reason i commented them out is because I thought that the section I posted there was only needed for the modifiers of the page. But as I said before all of that was wrong besides the sb-chalk board glitch. And the reason I posted at Joey Day is because he was the highest position I knew, and I KNEW that he would be able to stop what I did with little nasty backwash. And I wouldn't call this a discussion issue, I would call it a bad edit. But I will submit to power. Thanks for your time and patience, [[User:Jmoney|-Jmoney]] 12:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC) (P.S. it wasn't a question I posted.)

Revision as of 12:40, 29 November 2006

Where to discuss

Dear Jmoney, a good place to discuss details of an article's content is on the talk page for that article (the "discussion" tab). It's not as good to leave lengthy discussion in edit summaries and log summaries (because it's hard to actually have a discussion there), and still less good to leave long notes in invisicomments (because no one sees them except by accident). Also, JoeyDay isn't as active with the day-to-day operations as a lot of other people are, so a general help question should go on HRWiki talk:FAQ or, as noted above, the article talk page. Hope that helps! Keep on tranglin'. — It's dot com 23:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, what I was basing my descisions on were complete ignorance. So in my obsolete mind I thought it ok to put an explanation of what I did and why before some one went into the thing and changed it. I was expecting that they wouldn't have the sense to look there. The reason i commented them out is because I thought that the section I posted there was only needed for the modifiers of the page. But as I said before all of that was wrong besides the sb-chalk board glitch. And the reason I posted at Joey Day is because he was the highest position I knew, and I KNEW that he would be able to stop what I did with little nasty backwash. And I wouldn't call this a discussion issue, I would call it a bad edit. But I will submit to power. Thanks for your time and patience, -Jmoney 12:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC) (P.S. it wasn't a question I posted.)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Jmoney"
Personal tools