Talk:Expletives
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (comment) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Oh expletive deleted.: a bit more (EC)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{tbd}} | {{tbd}} | ||
| - | ==Oh expletive deleted.== | + | ==Oh, expletive deleted.== |
Unless it doesn't cover it very well, we already have an article on the matter: [[crap]]. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 01:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | Unless it doesn't cover it very well, we already have an article on the matter: [[crap]]. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 01:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I'm inclined to agree with MichaelXX2. We already have an article for [[crap]], as well as an article for [[swearing]]. Why do we need an article for mild "expletives"? {{User:DENNIS/sig}} 01:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | :I'm inclined to agree with MichaelXX2. We already have an article for [[crap]], as well as an article for [[swearing]]. Why do we need an article for mild "expletives"? {{User:DENNIS/sig}} 01:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| - | ::I'd say '''redirect''' this to [[Swears]]. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | + | ::1. an expletive is not a replacement for a bad word, but a bad word itself. 2. there really aren't that many replacements for expetives either. I'd say just '''redirect''' this to [[Swears]]. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC) |
| - | ::Agree. '''Redirect'''. {{User:DENNIS/sig}} 01:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | + | :::Agree. '''Redirect'''. {{User:DENNIS/sig}} 01:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC) |
| - | :::I think the only notable one (that doesn't already have its own article) is "what the pfargtl", which is covered in [[Swears]]. I don't think the others are notable enough to merit an article. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | + | ::::I think the only notable one (that doesn't already have its own article) is "what the pfargtl", which is covered in [[Swears]]. I don't think the others are notable enough to merit an article. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:31, 15 September 2010
Oh, expletive deleted.
Unless it doesn't cover it very well, we already have an article on the matter: crap. — MichaelXX2 
01:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree with MichaelXX2. We already have an article for crap, as well as an article for swearing. Why do we need an article for mild "expletives"? DENNIS T/C 01:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- 1. an expletive is not a replacement for a bad word, but a bad word itself. 2. there really aren't that many replacements for expetives either. I'd say just redirect this to Swears. — Defender1031*Talk 01:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. Redirect. DENNIS T/C 01:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- I think the only notable one (that doesn't already have its own article) is "what the pfargtl", which is covered in Swears. I don't think the others are notable enough to merit an article. — It's dot com 01:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. Redirect. DENNIS T/C 01:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- 1. an expletive is not a replacement for a bad word, but a bad word itself. 2. there really aren't that many replacements for expetives either. I'd say just redirect this to Swears. — Defender1031*Talk 01:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
