Talk:Nails

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Nails?: This is probably why we needed to discuss Spoons in the first place.)
Line 8: Line 8:
::::All of the uses are fairly interesting in that regard. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
::::All of the uses are fairly interesting in that regard. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
:::::Of course, as you have all shown, the term "interesting" can be subjective, which is why we probably needed to discuss HRWiki:Spoons in the first place. If we can find a couple more appearances of nails that also happen to be "interesting", then maybe I'll change my mind. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
:::::Of course, as you have all shown, the term "interesting" can be subjective, which is why we probably needed to discuss HRWiki:Spoons in the first place. If we can find a couple more appearances of nails that also happen to be "interesting", then maybe I'll change my mind. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::I am the one who created this page.I read the inclusion guidelines and this page seems fine.It follows them completely.The Chort is right.If you guys want to get rid of pages just because their boring,then why not delete [[Boxes]] or [[Cheese]] or anything boring.This is a running gag and it has 7 appearances.There is no reason to delete this page,and I'm not saying this just because I created the page.

Revision as of 23:23, 4 September 2009


Nails?

They're just nails. Nothing special. Besides, how would we mention them in inside references? A nail appears in this toon? free 20:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

This is the sort of article which would have been deleted quickly in accordance with HRWiki:Spoons in the past. However, a discussion is currently (or rather, used to be) taking place on its talk page over whether this project page actually describes a useful guideline. Instead, we should use the inclusion guidelines, which says that very generic items (such as nails) need "at least five to ten appearances and must be of at least moderate importance to the toon (i.e. not just in the background and never mentioned) in half of its appearances." Apart from "munch" and maybe Strong Mad's record, nails are used in pretty ordinary ways on the website. I'm not precisely sure what our currently policy is, but the way I see it, articles on this wiki need to be either interesting or useful to the project, and I'm not sure if documenting every appearance of boring old nails is either of those. Delete.The Chort 12:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't think constantly talking throughout a toon about galvanized nails or nailing a single piece of macaroni to a paper towel tube could be considered ordinary at all. Heimstern Läufer 13:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm with Heimstern Läufer. Talking through an entire toon about galvanized nails, or anything like that isn't plain or ordinary at all. I'd say it's worth keeping here. Not only that, but there could be alot more future sightings referring to nails. Keep. That'sBupkis! 13:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
All of the uses are fairly interesting in that regard. — Defender1031*Talk 17:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Of course, as you have all shown, the term "interesting" can be subjective, which is why we probably needed to discuss HRWiki:Spoons in the first place. If we can find a couple more appearances of nails that also happen to be "interesting", then maybe I'll change my mind. – The Chort 17:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I am the one who created this page.I read the inclusion guidelines and this page seems fine.It follows them completely.The Chort is right.If you guys want to get rid of pages just because their boring,then why not delete Boxes or Cheese or anything boring.This is a running gag and it has 7 appearances.There is no reason to delete this page,and I'm not saying this just because I created the page.