Talk:Commonwealth English

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Inclusion: I'm not liking)
(→Inclusion: Final boarding call for comments, this article is leaving the station.)
Line 8: Line 8:
:''neutral'':One thing that could be added would be the use of Australian slang in [[more armies]], but that only brings the total to 2 actual uses. (This gag would also mitigate the need to move the article if we can scare up a couple more...) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
:''neutral'':One thing that could be added would be the use of Australian slang in [[more armies]], but that only brings the total to 2 actual uses. (This gag would also mitigate the need to move the article if we can scare up a couple more...) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
::I have to agree with Phlip that this is kind of shaky at present. "Flavourite" and possibly "adVERtisements" are good, but otherwise this all seems like kind of a stretch (even the Australian slang really seems to me like it would be a separate gag). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
::I have to agree with Phlip that this is kind of shaky at present. "Flavourite" and possibly "adVERtisements" are good, but otherwise this all seems like kind of a stretch (even the Australian slang really seems to me like it would be a separate gag). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::So... this has been open for a while, but hasn't gotten many opinions... Is there anyone who has a good reason why this article should stay? {{User:Phlip/sig}} 09:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:10, 8 September 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Rename

Why is this called "Commonwealth English", not "British English"? The linked Wikipedia page is mainly concerned with the English language outside Britain. "British English" is a much better term for what this article describes. See also American and British English spelling differences. Loafing 07:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Inclusion

Of the 6 entries listed so far... three aren't related to Commonwealth or British English at all, but rather fake old-timey English (Thy Dungeonman, and the two "whilst" mentions). sb_email 22 is a stretch, trying to tie that to words with French-oid spellings... especially since, in the email, Strong Bad is talking specifically about names having an extra vowel at the end. Fan Stuff is legit, but is just a different spelling... there's no joke involved. So there's only one actual joke based around British English there... well short of the number needed for "running gag" status. --phlip TC 09:11, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

neutral:One thing that could be added would be the use of Australian slang in more armies, but that only brings the total to 2 actual uses. (This gag would also mitigate the need to move the article if we can scare up a couple more...) wbwolf (t | ed) 14:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
I have to agree with Phlip that this is kind of shaky at present. "Flavourite" and possibly "adVERtisements" are good, but otherwise this all seems like kind of a stretch (even the Australian slang really seems to me like it would be a separate gag). Heimstern Läufer 01:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
So... this has been open for a while, but hasn't gotten many opinions... Is there anyone who has a good reason why this article should stay? --phlip TC 09:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Commonwealth_English"
Personal tools