User talk:Raiku
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Undoing) |
(undid revision 603509;It wasn't too important in my book) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hey there, Sylar. I have deleted both character relationship articles that you have created. To begin with, both articles were completely empty apart from a few headings. If you really want to create an article, then you should provide some content that actually makes sense. Also, one of them had already been deleted following a [[Talk:The King of Town and The Poopsmith's Relationship|consensus]]. Please do not re-create deleted articles before a new consensus has been reached. You can start a new discussion on that talk page if you think it's necessary to have that article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | Hey there, Sylar. I have deleted both character relationship articles that you have created. To begin with, both articles were completely empty apart from a few headings. If you really want to create an article, then you should provide some content that actually makes sense. Also, one of them had already been deleted following a [[Talk:The King of Town and The Poopsmith's Relationship|consensus]]. Please do not re-create deleted articles before a new consensus has been reached. You can start a new discussion on that talk page if you think it's necessary to have that article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
Revision as of 01:34, 5 November 2008
Character relationships
Hey there, Sylar. I have deleted both character relationship articles that you have created. To begin with, both articles were completely empty apart from a few headings. If you really want to create an article, then you should provide some content that actually makes sense. Also, one of them had already been deleted following a consensus. Please do not re-create deleted articles before a new consensus has been reached. You can start a new discussion on that talk page if you think it's necessary to have that article. Loafing
21:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
