HRWiki:Sandbox

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Just a small visual example to help put things in perspective either way.)
(thinking outside the box again)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
something's not quite right for me {{sigbox|User:Johnny Jupiter/sig}}
 +
==Natural indents==
==Natural indents==
I would like to propose this idea. I think it's a good idea and I think you'll agree. It basically entails that all X be changed to Y. Feel free to critique. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I would like to propose this idea. I think it's a good idea and I think you'll agree. It basically entails that all X be changed to Y. Feel free to critique. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:12, 24 August 2007

something's not quite right for me

Natural indents

I would like to propose this idea. I think it's a good idea and I think you'll agree. It basically entails that all X be changed to Y. Feel free to critique. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I actually think that's a pretty good idea. Let's get those X changed to those Y! — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, definitely. X has needed to be Y for a long time. After this, maybe we can get A and B going, too. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Let's go for it as soon as possible. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Whoa there. I don't think we should go around screwing with X. X is X and Y is Y. We shouldn't change X to Y. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

X is interchangable with Y, and Y is more pleasing and better overall. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
No, it isn't. Semantically, X is this, and Y is that. X and Y are not alike enough to be interchanged. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I think it's a good proposal. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Threaded indents

I would like to propose this idea. I think it's a good idea and I think you'll agree. It basically entails that all X be changed to Y. Feel free to critique. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I actually think that's a pretty good idea. Let's get those X changed to those Y! — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, definitely. X has needed to be Y for a long time. After this, maybe we can get A and B going, too. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Let's go for it as soon as possible. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Whoa there. I don't think we should go around screwing with X. X is X and Y is Y. We shouldn't change X to Y. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
X is interchangable with Y, and Y is more pleasing and better overall. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
No, it isn't. Semantically, X is this, and Y is that. X and Y are not alike enough to be interchanged. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I think it's a good proposal. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)