Talk:Witch's Brew
From Homestar Runner Wiki
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Errrr... the inclusion of the word 'spelled' (a non-existant word) invalidates this whole page. | Errrr... the inclusion of the word 'spelled' (a non-existant word) invalidates this whole page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :You're kidding, right? [http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=spelled&x=0&y=0 Merriam-Webster entry] {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 14:51, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:51, 8 August 2005
Witches' vs. Witch's
In the show and Arcade Game it's spelt "witch's". Why is it "witches'" here? --Paliosun 20:32, 13 Nov 2004 (MST)
It's a matter of grammer.--Hysterical Woman 22:20, 13 Nov 2004 (MST)
"Witches'" is only correct if we know the brew belongs to more than one witch. To my knowledge, we don't. --Paliosun 11:56, 15 Nov 2004 (MST)
It probably just varies, then. Keep in mind the Brue spelling, then WCHS BRU in a weekly fanstuff. -Superdotman
It's usually only spoken, rather than written. Twice it's written as "witch's", but only once as "witches" (with no apostrophe - the online auction id). Everything else on the wiki is spelled the same as the site, grammatical or not, why is this different? And couldn't the non-grammatical-ness of "witch's" (which is stretching it anyway) be taken as part of the running joke? --phlip 06:14, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Why do people think that "witch's brew" is ungrammatical? "Witch's brew" == brew which belongs to only one witch. Aurora the Homestar Coder 06:19, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- "A witch's brew", "The witch's brew" and "Witches' brew" all are grammatical. "Witch's brew" with no article is nitpickingly ungrammatical. Especially nitpicking when compared to, say, "Witch's brüe" --phlip 07:10, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
Errrr... the inclusion of the word 'spelled' (a non-existant word) invalidates this whole page.
- You're kidding, right? Merriam-Webster entry Homestar Coder
14:51, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
