Template talk:web-screenshot
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
ACupOfCoffee (Talk | contribs) (→Update) |
m (→Update: Reply for ACupOfCoffee.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | :::I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::Okay, that's what I thought. I just wasn't sure because I don't recall any of us ever actively (as opposed to passively) caring about that point before. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 00:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | ::::Okay, that's what I thought. I just wasn't sure because I don't recall any of us ever actively (as opposed to passively) caring about that point before. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 00:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::Yeah, that's only in strict terms of the law. Otherwise, it's probably [[Template:don't know]]. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 03:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 03:39, 1 November 2006
[edit] Not a notice template:
I'm curious why this template is not considered a notice template? --Stux 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and that should be in that category. — It's dot com 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Ooooo! Great Idear! I'm on it! --Stux 21:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Update
Should we change the text of this template to reflect images like this? --Trogga 22:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- In the strict terms of the law, that image isn't being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use. In other words, this template doesn't apply to that image. -- Tom 06:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- By "not being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use" do you mean that it's not being used fairly or that it has nothing to do with Fair Use? — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 08:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- Tom 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, that's what I thought. I just wasn't sure because I don't recall any of us ever actively (as opposed to passively) caring about that point before. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 00:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- Tom 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's only in strict terms of the law. Otherwise, it's probably Template:don't know. -- Tom 03:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
