Talk:51
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Totally disjointed: more) |
(→Totally disjointed: reply) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It ''is'' slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC) | ::Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It ''is'' slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Regardless of what happens, remove the -1. It doesn't belong. Without it, we have a somewhat interesting phenomenon of using 51 as a score multiple times. Why that number each time? It's at least mildly interesting that they chose the same number (well, technically the same absolute value, but sometimes positive and sometimes negative) each time. Is it interesting enough for an article? I could be swayed yes or maybe no. I'm not convinced one way or another. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC) | :::Regardless of what happens, remove the -1. It doesn't belong. Without it, we have a somewhat interesting phenomenon of using 51 as a score multiple times. Why that number each time? It's at least mildly interesting that they chose the same number (well, technically the same absolute value, but sometimes positive and sometimes negative) each time. Is it interesting enough for an article? I could be swayed yes or maybe no. I'm not convinced one way or another. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::I think the only way to really resolve it is by having someone with too much time on his hands compile a list of all the numbers mentioned in the whole Homestar opus. Then we can really see if 51 is spacial or not. Regardless of this, number articles remind me color articles we deleted before, like [[Talk:Purple|Purple]]. Both look like amazing coincidences, and when you read the article you are wondering why choose this particular color/number all the time. And then you see the big picture and realize that this is just a drop in the ocean in the number of times other colors/numbers are mentioned and it's not all that spacial. Also, what other numbers of scores did we have? I'm sure that after seeing a list of all scores, 51 will lose it's significance. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 06:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:39, 28 November 2009
Totally disjointed
So this page is called "51", but as it stands, it has one instance of 51, one instance of -51, which isn't quite the same thing. and one instance of -1, which is completely not the same thing. There appears to be nothing special about 51. Delete hard and fast. — Defender1031*Talk 19:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Although I added an appearence, I don't really see the point of this page. At the very least, we should remove the 1 appearence. That's completly unrelated. We could change it to +/- 51 and keep the three instances. Would three be enough to keep it? Philip8o 19:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It is slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Regardless of what happens, remove the -1. It doesn't belong. Without it, we have a somewhat interesting phenomenon of using 51 as a score multiple times. Why that number each time? It's at least mildly interesting that they chose the same number (well, technically the same absolute value, but sometimes positive and sometimes negative) each time. Is it interesting enough for an article? I could be swayed yes or maybe no. I'm not convinced one way or another. Heimstern Läufer
06:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think the only way to really resolve it is by having someone with too much time on his hands compile a list of all the numbers mentioned in the whole Homestar opus. Then we can really see if 51 is spacial or not. Regardless of this, number articles remind me color articles we deleted before, like Purple. Both look like amazing coincidences, and when you read the article you are wondering why choose this particular color/number all the time. And then you see the big picture and realize that this is just a drop in the ocean in the number of times other colors/numbers are mentioned and it's not all that spacial. Also, what other numbers of scores did we have? I'm sure that after seeing a list of all scores, 51 will lose it's significance. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Regardless of what happens, remove the -1. It doesn't belong. Without it, we have a somewhat interesting phenomenon of using 51 as a score multiple times. Why that number each time? It's at least mildly interesting that they chose the same number (well, technically the same absolute value, but sometimes positive and sometimes negative) each time. Is it interesting enough for an article? I could be swayed yes or maybe no. I'm not convinced one way or another. Heimstern Läufer
- Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It is slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
