Talk:The

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Delete: reply)
(pointer to redirect)
 
(includes 7 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{ttbd}}
+
{{deletedtalk|redirect=Integral Article}}
== The Delete ==
== The Delete ==
Line 6: Line 6:
::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
:::I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
:::I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've *been* making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually *do* that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone *did* make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P  In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
:::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
::::::::Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalent to this article, I propose an immediate '''redirect''' to that article. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
:::::::::This article is just one big joke... I'm redirecting it to [[Integral Article]]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Current revision as of 16:17, 19 June 2009

DELETED!
This is the talk page of an article that has been redirected to Integral Article. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

[edit] The Delete

The? An article on "The"? Oh, just delete it. This is such a spoon type article. wbwolf (t | ed) 04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

You know, i think this article illustrates the point better than the word spoons. i move for rewriting the spoons article to be on the word "the" instead... (And yes, delete VERY VERY hard). ;) — Defender1031*Talk 04:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I think redirecting it to Integral Article might also be a good notion. --DorianGray 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. — Defender1031*Talk 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've *been* making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually *do* that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone *did* make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, redirect to Integral Article. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Was this article a joke??! A redirect to Integral Article would be the soft option; I'm for deleting it outright. --Jay (Gobble) 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. Heimstern Läufer 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect. Loafing 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalent to this article, I propose an immediate redirect to that article. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! – The Chort 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
This article is just one big joke... I'm redirecting it to Integral Article. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 20:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools